World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephanie A. Sanders

Stephanie A. Sanders

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2510 2297 1454 1301 198 14833

Stephanie A. Sanders publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie A. Sanders between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie A. Sanders published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2010. 3 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2010. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1982 2025

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie A. Sanders: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 4
1992 4
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 5
2005 5
2006 6
2007 3
2008 13
2009 6
2010 24
2011 9
2012 8
2013 12
2014 23
2015 11
2016 16
2017 15
2018 5
2019 6
2020 5
2021 1
2022 1
2023 6
2024 0
2025 3
Total 223
Download as CSV

Stephanie A. Sanders publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie A. Sanders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 198
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie A. Sanders D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie A. Sanders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephanie A. Sanders is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with significant contributions to general health professions, demography, ecology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Stephanie A. Sanders has published articles in several journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Science
  • International Journal of STD & AIDS
  • Family Relations

Notable recent papers include:

  • A first-in-human proof-of-concept trial of intravaginal artesunate to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (CIN2/3), 2020, Gynecologic Oncology
  • Comment on "Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior", 2021, Science
  • A Cross-Country Comparison of Reasons for Condom Use during Menses: Associations with Age and Gender Inequality, 2020, International Journal of Sexual Health
  • A home-practice intervention for increasing condom use among university undergraduates, 2020, International Journal of STD & AIDS
  • An exploratory test of a couples-based condom-use intervention designed to promote pleasurable and safer penile-vaginal sex among university students, 2020, Journal of American College Health

Frequent collaborators in their research include Cynthia A. Graham, Robin R. Milhausen, William L. Yarber, Richard A. Crosby, and Karen B. Vanterpool. These coauthors have contributed multiple joint publications, reflecting ongoing partnerships across studies in sexual health and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14-94

    Debby Herbenick;Michael Reece;Vanessa Schick;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • The association between duration of breastfeeding and adult intelligence.

    Erik Lykke Mortensen;Kim Fleischer Michaelsen;Stephanie A. Sanders;June Machover Reinisch

  • Would You Say You Had Sex If . . .

    Stephanie A. Sanders;June Machover Reinisch

  • The dual control model: current status and future directions.

    John Bancroft;Cynthia A. Graham;Erick Janssen;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women's sexual arousal

    Cynthia A. Graham;Stephanie A. Sanders;Robin R. Milhausen;Kimberly R. McBride

  • A prospective study of the effects of oral contraceptives on sexuality and well-being and their relationship to discontinuation.

    Stephanie A Sanders;Cynthia A Graham;Jennifer L Bass;John Bancroft

  • Gender Differences in Heterosexual College Students' Conceptualizations and Indicators of Sexual Consent: Implications for Contemporary Sexual Assault Prevention Education

    Kristen N Jozkowski;Zoë D Peterson;Stephanie A Sanders;Barbara Dennis

  • In Utero Exposure to Phenobarbital and Intelligence Deficits in Adult Men

    June Machover Reinisch;Stephanie A. Sanders;Erik Lykke Mortensen;Donald B. Rubin

  • Sexual Behaviors, Condom Use, and Sexual Health of Americans Over 50: Implications for Sexual Health Promotion for Older Adults

    Vanessa Schick;Debby Herbenick;Michael Reece;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States

    Michael Reece;Debby Herbenick;Vanessa Schick;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • A Psychometric Comparison of Three Scales and a Single-Item Measure to Assess Sexual Satisfaction

    Kristen P. Mark;Kristen P. Mark;Debby Herbenick;J. Dennis Fortenberry;Stephanie Sanders

  • Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: results from a nationally representative study.

    Debra Herbenick;Michael Reece;Stephanie Sanders;Brian Dodge

  • An assessment of body appreciation and its relationship to sexual function in women

    Sonya Satinsky;Michael Reece;Barbara Dennis;Stephanie Sanders

  • The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): Results from a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Women in the United States

    Debra Herbenick;Vanessa Schick;Michael Reece;Stephanie Sanders

  • Condom use errors and problems: a global view

    Stephanie A. Sanders;William L. Yarber;Erin L. Kaufman;Richard A. Crosby;Richard A. Crosby

  • Sexual diversity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative probability sample of adult women and men

    Debby Herbenick;Jessamyn Bowling;Tsung-Chieh Jane Fu;Brian Dodge

  • Condom use errors and problems among college men.

    Richard A. Crosby;Stephanie A. Sanders;William L. Yarber;Cynthia A. Graham

  • Better psychological functioning and higher social status may largely explain the apparent health benefits of wine: a study of wine and beer drinking in young Danish adults.

    Erik L. Mortensen;Hans H. Jensen;Stephanie A. Sanders;June M. Reinisch

  • The Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Psychometric Properties

    Cynthia A. Graham;Cynthia A. Graham;Stephanie A. Sanders;Robin R. Milhausen

  • Homosexuality/heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation.

    David P. McWhirter;Stephanie Ann Sanders;June Machover Reinisch

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia A. Graham
Cynthia A. Graham University of Southampton
Richard A. Crosby
Richard A. Crosby University of Kentucky
Robin R. Milhausen
Robin R. Milhausen University of Guelph
J. Dennis Fortenberry
J. Dennis Fortenberry Indiana University
Debby Herbenick
Debby Herbenick Indiana University
Michael Reece
Michael Reece Indiana University
Vanessa Schick
Vanessa Schick The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Brian Dodge
Brian Dodge Indiana University
Erik Lykke Mortensen
Erik Lykke Mortensen University of Copenhagen
Erick Janssen
Erick Janssen KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology program is a crucial step in launching a successful career in mental health, counseling, or research. Many students are now considering online psychology degrees due to their flexibility and accessibility, allowing for continued employment or family commitments while studying.

When selecting an online psychology program, evaluating value and return on investment is essential. Programs like the most valuable psychology programs in New York or the best value psychology degrees in Phoenix provide excellent examples of institutions where high academic standards align with strong post-graduation outcomes.

Beyond academics, consider the local job market, networking opportunities, and clinical placement options. For example, the most valuable psychology programs in Raleigh and the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in St. Louis highlight regions with robust career pathways and reputable degree programs.

By thoroughly researching accredited online programs and local opportunities, students can find a path that best matches their goals, budget, and learning style.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie A. Sanders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles