World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gunda Mohanakrishna

Gunda Mohanakrishna

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 47 4990 4802 79 79 83 6573
Environmental Sciences 49 5366 5141 56 53 89 6857

Gunda Mohanakrishna publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gunda Mohanakrishna between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gunda Mohanakrishna published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2018. 10 of the 94 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2018. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 2 publications
2007 2025

94 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gunda Mohanakrishna: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 7
2009 5
2010 7
2011 6
2012 5
2013 1
2014 0
2015 3
2016 8
2017 2
2018 10
2019 9
2020 6
2021 1
2022 4
2023 9
2024 8
2025 2
Total 94
Download as CSV

Gunda Mohanakrishna publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunda Mohanakrishna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190 83
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Gunda Mohanakrishna D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunda Mohanakrishna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306 47
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Ecology
  • Redox

Sewage treatment, Microbial fuel cell, Wastewater, Waste management and Pulp and paper industry are his primary areas of study. Microbial fuel cell is a subfield of Anode that Gunda Mohanakrishna studies. His Anode research includes elements of Environmental engineering and Bioelectrochemistry.

His studies in Wastewater integrate themes in fields like Biohydrogen and Fermentation. As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Waste management, narrowing it down to issues related to the Microbial electrosynthesis, and often Carbon fixation and Carbon. Within one scientific family, Gunda Mohanakrishna focuses on topics pertaining to Hydrogen production under Pulp and paper industry, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Acidogenesis and Bioreactor.

His most cited work include:

  • An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): Technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond (168 citations)
  • Bio-electrochemical treatment of distillery wastewater in microbial fuel cell facilitating decolorization and desalination along with power generation. (166 citations)
  • BIOELECTRICITY PRODUCTION FROM WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN DUAL CHAMBERED MICROBIAL FUEL CELL (MFC) USING SELECTIVELY ENRICHED MIXED MICROFLORA: EFFECT OF CATHOLYTE (164 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Wastewater, Microbial fuel cell, Anode, Sewage treatment and Pulp and paper industry. To a larger extent, Gunda Mohanakrishna studies Waste management with the aim of understanding Wastewater. His Microbial fuel cell research includes themes of Renewable energy, Chemical engineering, Microbial electrosynthesis and Chemical oxygen demand.

His work on Faraday efficiency as part of general Anode study is frequently linked to Degradation, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Sewage treatment research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Biodiesel and Ecology, Waste treatment. His Pulp and paper industry research also works with subjects such as

  • Biohydrogen that connect with fields like Acidogenesis and Fermentation,
  • Microbial electrolysis cell most often made with reference to Hydrogen production.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Wastewater (41.67%)
  • Microbial fuel cell (43.06%)
  • Anode (26.39%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Microbial fuel cell (43.06%)
  • Biochemical engineering (22.22%)
  • Anode (26.39%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Microbial fuel cell, Biochemical engineering, Anode, Wastewater and Microbial electrosynthesis. His study on Bioelectrogenesis is often connected to Energy source as part of broader study in Microbial fuel cell. He has researched Biochemical engineering in several fields, including Biorefinery and Microbial electrolysis cell.

His Anode research incorporates elements of Bacterial cell structure, Photochemistry, Electron transfer, Redox and Shewanella. The study incorporates disciplines such as Oil refinery, Total dissolved solids, Pollutant and Pulp and paper industry in addition to Wastewater. His biological study deals with issues like Biohydrogen, which deal with fields such as Bioproducts.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Surpassing the current limitations of high purity H2 production in microbial electrolysis cell (MECs): Strategies for inhibiting growth of methanogens. (44 citations)
  • Enhanced treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater by short-term applied voltage in single chamber microbial fuel cell. (41 citations)
  • Impact of dissolved carbon dioxide concentration on the process parameters during its conversion to acetate through microbial electrosynthesis (31 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Redox
  • Ecology

Gunda Mohanakrishna spends much of his time researching Microbial fuel cell, Wastewater, Anode, Oil refinery and Bioelectrogenesis. His Microbial fuel cell study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Carbon fixation, Carbon dioxide, Microbial electrosynthesis, Carbon and Renewable energy. In his research, Cathodic protection, Redox, Electrochemical potential and Nuclear chemistry is intimately related to Diesel fuel, which falls under the overarching field of Anode.

His study brings together the fields of Pulp and paper industry and Bioelectrogenesis. His Pulp and paper industry research includes themes of Hydraulic retention time, Bioelectrochemical reactor and Produced water. His work blends Energy source and Waste management studies together.

Best Publications

  • An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): Technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond

    Suman Bajracharya;Suman Bajracharya;Mohita Sharma;Mohita Sharma;Gunda Mohanakrishna;Xochitl Dominguez Benneton

  • BIOELECTRICITY PRODUCTION FROM WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN DUAL CHAMBERED MICROBIAL FUEL CELL (MFC) USING SELECTIVELY ENRICHED MIXED MICROFLORA: EFFECT OF CATHOLYTE

    S. Venkata Mohan;R. Saravanan;S. Veer Raghavulu;G. Mohanakrishna

  • Bio-electrochemical treatment of distillery wastewater in microbial fuel cell facilitating decolorization and desalination along with power generation.

    G. Mohanakrishna;S. Venkata Mohan;P.N. Sarma

  • Bioelectricity generation from chemical wastewater treatment in mediatorless (anode) microbial fuel cell (MFC) using selectively enriched hydrogen producing mixed culture under acidophilic microenvironment

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;B. Purushotham Reddy;R. Saravanan

  • Biotransformation of carbon dioxide in bioelectrochemical systems: State of the art and future prospects

    Suman Bajracharya;Suman Bajracharya;Sandipam Srikanth;Gunda Mohanakrishna;Gunda Mohanakrishna;Renju Zacharia

  • Bio-catalyzed electrochemical treatment of real field dairy wastewater with simultaneous power generation

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;G. Velvizhi;V. Lalit Babu

  • Technological advances in CO2 conversion electro-biorefinery: A step toward commercialization.

    Ahmed ElMekawy;Hanaa M. Hegab;Gunda Mohanakrishna;Ashraf F. Elbaz

  • Utilizing acid-rich effluents of fermentative hydrogen production process as substrate for harnessing bioelectricity: An integrative approach

    G. Mohanakrishna;S. Venkata Mohan;P.N. Sarma

  • Sustainable power generation from floating macrophytes based ecological microenvironment through embedded fuel cells along with simultaneous wastewater treatment.

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;P. Chiranjeevi

  • Integration of acidogenic and methanogenic processes for simultaneous production of biohydrogen and methane from wastewater treatment

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;P.N. Sarma

  • Surpassing the current limitations of high purity H2 production in microbial electrolysis cell (MECs): Strategies for inhibiting growth of methanogens.

    Abudukeremu Kadier;Mohd Sahaid Kalil;Kuppam Chandrasekhar;Gunda Mohanakrishna

  • Enhancing biohydrogen production from chemical wastewater treatment in anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) by bioaugmenting with selectively enriched kanamycin resistant anaerobic mixed consortia

    S.Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;S. Veer Raghavulu;P.N. Sarma

  • Composite vegetable waste as renewable resource for bioelectricity generation through non-catalyzed open-air cathode microbial fuel cell

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;P.N. Sarma

  • An enriched electroactive homoacetogenic biocathode for the microbial electrosynthesis of acetate through carbon dioxide reduction

    Gunda Mohanakrishna;Jai Sankar Seelam;Karolien Vanbroekhoven;Deepak Pant

  • Imperative role of applied potential and inorganic carbon source on acetate production through microbial electrosynthesis

    Gunda Mohanakrishna;Karolien Vanbroekhoven;Deepak Pant

  • Emerging trends and advances in valorization of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels.

    Unknown

  • Rhizosphere mediated electrogenesis with the function of anode placement for harnessing bioenergy through CO2 sequestration

    P. Chiranjeevi;G. Mohanakrishna;S. Venkata Mohan

  • Simultaneous biohydrogen production and wastewater treatment in biofilm configured anaerobic periodic discontinuous batch reactor using distillery wastewater

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;S.V. Ramanaiah;P.N. Sarma

  • Acidogenic fermentation of vegetable based market waste to harness biohydrogen with simultaneous stabilization.

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;R. Kannaiah Goud;P.N. Sarma

  • Dark fermentative hydrogen production: Potential of food waste as future energy needs.

    Unknown

  • Effect of anodic metabolic function on bioelectricity generation and substrate degradation in single chambered microbial fuel cell.

    S Venkata Mohan;G Mohanakrishna;P N Sarma

  • Harnessing of bioelectricity in microbial fuel cell (MFC) employing aerated cathode through anaerobic treatment of chemical wastewater using selectively enriched hydrogen producing mixed consortia

    S. Venkata Mohan;G. Mohanakrishna;S. Srikanth;P.N. Sarma

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Venkata Mohan
S. Venkata Mohan Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
Deepak Pant
Deepak Pant Flemish Institute for Technological Research
P.N. Sarma
P.N. Sarma Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
David P.B.T.B. Strik
David P.B.T.B. Strik Wageningen University & Research
Zhen He
Zhen He Washington University in St. Louis
Vipin Chandra Kalia
Vipin Chandra Kalia Konkuk University
Jung-Kul Lee
Jung-Kul Lee Konkuk University
Gopalakrishnan Kumar
Gopalakrishnan Kumar Yonsei University
Arivalagan Pugazhendhi
Arivalagan Pugazhendhi Cape Breton University
Huanting Wang
Huanting Wang Monash University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Engineering and Technology can open doors to a wide variety of career opportunities. For those who want to boost their qualifications quickly, there are 6 month masters degree programs that deliver advanced knowledge in a compressed timeframe—ideal for professionals looking to upskill without a long-term commitment.

If you need an even faster route to employment, several short certificate programs that pay well are available online. These programs focus on practical skills and are designed to connect graduates swiftly to high-demand jobs.

Online education is also evolving to meet the needs of different learners. For example, flexible options like online degrees for moms make it easier for parents and busy adults to balance education with other responsibilities.

Those seeking rapid upskilling will benefit from 6 week certification programs that deliver targeted, career-focused training in just a few weeks. Whatever your situation or career goal, online pathways offer flexibility and access to quality education in Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Gunda Mohanakrishna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles