World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
11408
World Ranking
4228
National Ranking
2357

Michael Reece publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Reece sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Reece D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Reece sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Reece is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work addresses core topics related to HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, HIV, Drug Use, and Sexual Risk, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Sex Work and Related Issues, and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment. These themes reflect a multidisciplinary approach toward understanding and addressing public health challenges within marginalized and rural populations.

Recent publications by Michael Reece include studies on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake, health care experiences, and adherence among rural Midwestern men who have sex with men (MSM). Key papers are:

  • Facilitators and Barriers of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among Rural Men who have Sex with Men Living in the Midwestern U.S., 2020, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Exploring the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Health Care Experiences Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) Who Live in Rural Areas of the Midwest, 2020, AIDS Education and Prevention
  • Assessing determinants of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among a sample of rural Midwestern men who have sex with men (MSM), 2020, AIDS Care
  • Shared Injection Experiences: Interpersonal Involvement in Injection Drug Practices among Women, 2021, Substance Abuse

The publication venues for these articles include Archives of Sexual Behavior, AIDS Education and Prevention, AIDS Care, and Substance Abuse. Each venue reflects interdisciplinary intersections among sexual behavior, health education, clinical care, and substance abuse research.

Michael Reece frequently collaborates with a consistent group of coauthors, which indicates engagement in stable research networks. Frequent coauthors include Brian Dodge, Christopher Owens, Randolph D. Hubach, Deana Williams, and Jessica Nina Lester.

Overall, their research contribution has centered on understanding behavioral, social, and clinical factors affecting HIV prevention and treatment adherence, particularly in rural and marginalized populations. The emphasis on rural Midwestern men who have sex with men highlights a focus on geographic and demographic groups that often face unique healthcare barriers.

Best Publications

  • Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14-94

    Debby Herbenick;Michael Reece;Vanessa Schick;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Validity/reliability of PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 depression scales among adults living with HIV/AIDS in western Kenya.

    Patrick O. Monahan;Enbal Shacham;Michael Reece;Kurt Kroenke

  • FROM BIAS TO BISEXUAL HEALTH DISPARITIES: ATTITUDES TOWARD BISEXUAL MEN AND WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES.

    M. Reuel Friedman;Brian Dodge;Vanessa Schick;Debby Herbenick

  • Gender Differences in Heterosexual College Students' Conceptualizations and Indicators of Sexual Consent: Implications for Contemporary Sexual Assault Prevention Education

    Kristen N Jozkowski;Zoë D Peterson;Stephanie A Sanders;Barbara Dennis

  • Sexual Behaviors, Condom Use, and Sexual Health of Americans Over 50: Implications for Sexual Health Promotion for Older Adults

    Vanessa Schick;Debby Herbenick;Michael Reece;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States

    Michael Reece;Debby Herbenick;Vanessa Schick;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Attitudes toward Bisexual Men and Women among a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Adults in the United States.

    Brian Dodge;Debby Herbenick;M Reuel Friedman;Vanessa Schick

  • A Psychometric Comparison of Three Scales and a Single-Item Measure to Assess Sexual Satisfaction

    Kristen P. Mark;Kristen P. Mark;Debby Herbenick;J. Dennis Fortenberry;Stephanie Sanders

  • Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: results from a nationally representative study.

    Debra Herbenick;Michael Reece;Stephanie Sanders;Brian Dodge

  • An assessment of body appreciation and its relationship to sexual function in women

    Sonya Satinsky;Michael Reece;Barbara Dennis;Stephanie Sanders

  • Sexual compulsivity among heterosexual college students.

    Brian Dodge;Michael Reece;Sara L. Cole;Theo G. M. Sandfort

  • The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): Results from a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Women in the United States

    Debra Herbenick;Vanessa Schick;Michael Reece;Stephanie Sanders

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH—OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT: Development and Validation of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale

    Debra Herbenick;Michael Reece

  • Sexual Behaviors and Situational Characteristics of Most Recent Male‐Partnered Sexual Event among Gay and Bisexually Identified Men in the United States

    Joshua G. Rosenberger;Joshua G. Rosenberger;Joshua G. Rosenberger;Michael Reece;Vanessa Schick;Debby Herbenick

  • Consenting to sexual activity: the development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent.

    Kristen N. Jozkowski;Kristen N. Jozkowski;Stephanie Sanders;Zoë D. Peterson;Barbara Dennis

  • An Event-Level Analysis of the Sexual Characteristics and Composition Among Adults Ages 18 to 59: Results from a National Probability Sample in the United States

    Debby Herbenick;Michael Reece;Vanessa Schick;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Sexual behaviors, relationships, and perceived health among adult men in the United States: results from a national probability sample.

    Michael Reece;Debby Herbenick;Vanessa Schick;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Using the Sexual Compulsivity Scale to Predict Outcomes of Sexual Behavior in Young Adults

    Kimberly R. McBride;Michael Reece;Stephanie A. Sanders

  • Prevalence, Frequency, and Associations of Masturbation With Partnered Sexual Behaviors Among US Adolescents

    Cynthia L. Robbins;Vanessa Schick;Michael Reece;Debra Herbenick

  • Pubic Hair Removal among Women in the United States: Prevalence, Methods, and Characteristics

    Debra Herbenick;Vanessa Schick;Michael Reece;Stephanie Sanders

  • A CBPR Partnership Increases HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM): Outcome Findings From a Pilot Test of the CyBER/testing Internet Intervention

    Scott D. Rhodes;Aaron T. Vissman;Jason Stowers;Cindy Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Debby Herbenick
Debby Herbenick Indiana University
Brian Dodge
Brian Dodge Indiana University
J. Dennis Fortenberry
J. Dennis Fortenberry Indiana University
Vanessa Schick
Vanessa Schick The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Stephanie A. Sanders
Stephanie A. Sanders Indiana University
Gregory D. Zimet
Gregory D. Zimet Indiana University
Susan E. Middlestadt
Susan E. Middlestadt Indiana University
Peter R. Finn
Peter R. Finn Indiana University
Scott D. Rhodes
Scott D. Rhodes Wake Forest University
Cynthia A. Graham
Cynthia A. Graham University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing psychology, there are several flexible online degree options that can open doors to rewarding careers such as counseling or mental health services. These programs often allow you to balance study with personal commitments while preparing for licensure and professional roles.

States offer various accelerated options if you’re looking for the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Kansas or considering Kentucky accelerated counseling programs. Each state has its own requirements, but many now provide online coursework with internship components, allowing students to gain practical experience without relocating.

Interested in different locations? Explore the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Louisiana, or learn about the fastest way to become a counselor in Maine. These pathways are ideal for those who already hold a bachelor’s degree or are eager to expedite their entry into the mental health field.

No matter your location, exploring online psychology and counseling programs can help you start a meaningful career. Be sure to review state-specific guidelines to find the program that best matches your goals and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Reece

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles