World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2847 2612 166 152 177 15095

E. Sandra Byers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. Sandra Byers between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. Sandra Byers published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 14 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
1977 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. Sandra Byers: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 3
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 4
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 6
1997 3
1998 5
1999 4
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 5
2010 6
2011 4
2012 4
2013 13
2014 9
2015 5
2016 9
2017 12
2018 5
2019 8
2020 13
2021 13
2022 7
2023 3
2024 7
2025 7
Total 197
Download as CSV

E. Sandra Byers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Sandra Byers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 177 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 177
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. Sandra Byers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Sandra Byers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. Sandra Byers is affiliated with the University of New Brunswick in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant focus within subfields such as Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology; Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health; Sexual Function and Dysfunction Studies; Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies; LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy; Sex Work and Related Issues; and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics.

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Byers include:

  • "Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire," 2021, PsycTESTS Dataset
  • "#consent: University students' perceptions of their sexual consent education," 2020, The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
  • "Toward an Integrative Model of Intimacy, Sexual Satisfaction, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Prospective Study in Long-Term Couples," 2022, The Journal of Sex Research
  • "Parent-Adolescent Sexual Communication in India: Responses of Middle Class Parents," 2020, Journal of Family Issues
  • "A Dyadic Longitudinal Study of Child Maltreatment and Sexual Well-Being in Adult Couples: The Buffering Effect of a Satisfying Relationship," 2020, The Journal of Sex Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Byers include:

  • Lucia F. O'Sullivan
  • Pablo Santos-Iglesias
  • Audrey Brassard
  • Sophie Bergeron
  • Katherine Péloquin

Byers has contributed extensively to several publication venues such as:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Sexual & Relationship Therapy
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Best Publications

  • Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction

    Kelli-An Lawrance;E. Sandra Byers

  • Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: a longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships.

    E Sandra Byers

  • How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research.

    E. Sandra Byers

  • Sexual satisfaction and sexual self‐disclosure within dating relationships

    E. Sandra Byers;Stephanie Demmons

  • International Consultation on Sexual Medicine ReportPsychological and Interpersonal Dimensions of Sexual Function and Dysfunction

    Lori Brotto;Sandrine Atallah;Crista Johnson-Agbakwu;Talli Rosenbaum

  • Role of sexual self-disclosure in the sexual satisfaction of long-term heterosexual couples.

    Sheila MacNeil;E Sandra Byers

  • Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples:

    Sheila MacNeil;E. Sandra Byers

  • The Attitudes Towards Dating Violence Scales: Development and Initial Validation

    E. Lisa Price;E. Sandra Byers;Nicole Belliveau;Robert Bonner

  • The co-occurrence of adolescent boys' and girls' use of psychologically, physically, and sexually abusive behaviours in their dating relationships.

    Heather A. Sears;E. Sandra Byers;E. Lisa Price

  • THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BODY IMAGE, BODY MASS INDEX, EXERCISE, AND SEXUAL FUNCTIONING IN HETEROSEXUAL WOMEN

    Angela D. Weaver;E. Sandra Byers

  • Sexual Satisfaction within Dating Relationships: A Test of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction

    E. Sandra Byers;Stephanie Demmons;Kohli-An Lawrance

  • College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan;E. Sandra Byers

  • THE SEXUAL WELL‐BEING OF WOMEN WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE

    Suzanne R. Lemieux;E. Sandra Byers

  • Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction.

    E Sandra Byers;Sheila MacNeil

  • A Comparison of Male and Female College Students' Experiences of Sexual Coercion.

    Lucia F. O'Sullivan;E. Sandra Byers;Larry Finkelman

  • The Relationships between Sexual Problems, Communication, and Sexual Satisfaction

    Sheila MacNeil;E. Sandra Byers

  • Beyond the birds and the bees and was it good for you?: Thirty years of research on sexual communication.

    E. Sandra Byers

  • Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Kelli-an Lawrance;E. Sandra Byers;Jacqueline N. Cohen

  • Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy

    E. Sandra Byers;Kim Lewis

  • Parents’ Reports of Sexual Communication With Children in Kindergarten to Grade 8

    E. Sandra Byers;Heather A. Sears;Angela D. Weaver

Frequent Co-Authors

Lucia F. O'Sullivan
Lucia F. O'Sullivan University of New Brunswick
Lori A. Brotto
Lori A. Brotto University of British Columbia
Pedro Nobre
Pedro Nobre University of Porto
Judith Wuest
Judith Wuest University of New Brunswick
Natalie O. Rosen
Natalie O. Rosen Dalhousie University
Christine Purdon
Christine Purdon University of Waterloo
Christian Grov
Christian Grov City University of New York
David A. Clark
David A. Clark University of New Brunswick
Cynthia A. Graham
Cynthia A. Graham University of Southampton
Caroline F. Pukall
Caroline F. Pukall Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online degrees and career paths, including becoming a licensed therapist or counselor. Many states have specific requirements for licensure, which typically include obtaining a relevant graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing a licensing exam.

Prospective therapists should carefully review the Greensboro licensed therapist requirements to understand the educational and training steps involved. Each state may have unique expectations—for example, learning about the Henderson licensed therapist education requirements can reveal differences in coursework and fieldwork hours.

Online degrees can provide flexibility, but students should ensure their program meets all regional licensing standards. Researching how to fulfill the criteria for becoming a licensed therapist in Honolulu or the specific Houston licensed therapist requirements can help guide your educational choices.

Whether you want to work in school counseling, mental health, or clinical psychology, understanding your state’s requirements is crucial for a successful career pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing E. Sandra Byers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles