World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard M. McFall

Richard M. McFall

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
7973
World Ranking
10045
National Ranking
5294

Richard M. McFall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. McFall sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard M. McFall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. McFall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. McFall is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. The available information does not specify particular fields of study, subfields, or main research topics linked with their work.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues documented for Richard M. McFall in the provided data.

No book publications or awards have been recorded in the supplied data.

Best Publications

  • A review and reformulation of the concept of social skills.

    Richard M. McFall

  • A social-behavioral analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent boys.

    Barbara J. Freedman;Lisa Rosenthal;Clyde P. Donahoe Jr.;David G. Schlundt

  • Behavior rehearsal with modeling and coaching in assertion training.

    Richard M. McFall;Diane B. Lillesand

  • Behavioral training of social skills in shy males.

    Craig T. Twentyman;Richard M. McFall

  • Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care

    Timothy B. Baker;Richard M. McFall;Varda Shoham

  • An experimental investigation of behavior rehearsal in assertive training.

    Richard M. McFall;Albert R. Marston

  • Effects of self-monitoring on normal smoking behavior.

    Richard M. McFall

  • Development and evaluation of an interpersonal skill-training program for psychiatric inpatients.

    Jean B. Goldsmith;Richard M. McFall

  • QUANTIFYING THE INFORMATION VALUE OF CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS WITH SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY.

    Richard M. McFall;Teresa A. Treat

  • Four experiments on the relative contributions of rehearsal, modeling, and coaching to assertion training.

    Unknown

  • Motivation, structure, and self-monitoring: role of nonspecific factors in smoking reduction.

    Richard M. McFall;Constance L. Hammen

  • Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent.

    Coreen Farris;Teresa A. Treat;Richard J. Viken;Richard M. McFall

  • Heterosocial perception in rapists.

    David N. Lipton;Elizabeth C. McDonel;Richard M. McFall

  • Self-monitoring effects in a program for potential high school dropouts: a time-series analysis.

    John M. Gottman;Richard M. McFall

  • A Comparison of Social Skills in Delinquent and Nondelinquent Adolescent Girls Using a Behavioral Role-Playing Inventory.

    Lisa Rosenthal Gaffney;Richard M. McFall

  • Design and analysis of research using time series.

    John M. Gottman;Richard M. McFall;Jean T. Barnett

  • Cognitive Processes Underlying Women's Risk Judgments: Associations With Sexual Victimization History and Rape Myth Acceptance

    Elizabeth A. Yeater;Teresa A. Treat;Richard J. Viken;Richard M. McFall

  • Perceptual Mechanisms That Characterize Gender Differences in Decoding Women's Sexual Intent

    Coreen Farris;Teresa A. Treat;Richard J. Viken;Richard M. McFall

  • Comparison of behavior modification approaches to smoking reduction.

    Albert R. Marston;Richard M. Mcfall

  • The enhancement of social skills: An information-processing analysis.

    Richard M. McFall

  • Relation of social competence to scores on two scales of psychosis proneness.

    Mark C. Haberman;Loren J. Chapman;Janet S. Numbers;Richard M. McFall

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Viken
Richard J. Viken Indiana University
John K. Kruschke
John K. Kruschke Indiana University
Joseph E. Steinmetz
Joseph E. Steinmetz The Ohio State University
Robert M. Nosofsky
Robert M. Nosofsky Indiana University
James T. Townsend
James T. Townsend Indiana University
Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charlene L. Muehlenhard
Charlene L. Muehlenhard University of Kansas
Loren J. Chapman
Loren J. Chapman University of Wisconsin–Madison
William Timberlake
William Timberlake Indiana University
Constance Hammen
Constance Hammen University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to diverse careers and online degree opportunities. For those interested in counseling professions, many specialized tracks—such as becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT)—require both academic credentials and state-specific licensing.

Each state sets its own standards for MFTs. If you’re curious about Laredo mft certification requirements, you’ll learn about educational prerequisites, supervised clinical experience, and examination processes. Similarly, understanding mft requirements in Las Vegas can help guide your study path and career planning in Nevada.

Additionally, resources about how to become an mft in Lexington and meeting mft requirements in Lincoln provide valuable state-specific insights. Knowing these requirements can help you select online programs that fit your career goals, ensuring that your education aligns with licensing expectations wherever you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. McFall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles