World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 94 823 719 517 441 348 26712

Peter M. Monti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter M. Monti between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter M. Monti published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 8 of the 363 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
1971 2025

363 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter M. Monti: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 2
1977 4
1978 2
1979 1
1980 3
1981 3
1982 4
1983 4
1984 4
1985 5
1986 4
1987 4
1988 5
1989 5
1990 2
1991 4
1992 4
1993 5
1994 4
1995 7
1996 3
1997 6
1998 5
1999 9
2000 8
2001 8
2002 11
2003 10
2004 13
2005 10
2006 10
2007 15
2008 9
2009 8
2010 12
2011 14
2012 10
2013 14
2014 10
2015 18
2016 15
2017 15
2018 10
2019 11
2020 5
2021 6
2022 5
2023 7
2024 6
2025 2
Total 363
Download as CSV

Peter M. Monti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Monti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 348 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 348
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter M. Monti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Monti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78 94
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Peter M. Monti is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on subfields such as Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The main topics of their research include:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Peter M. Monti has published frequently in several academic venues, notably:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Addiction
  • Psychological Assessment

Among recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by Monti are the following:

  • Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to explore mechanisms of alcohol-involved HIV risk behavior among men who have sex with men (MSM), 2020, Addiction
  • Association of Substance Use With Behavioral Adherence to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for COVID-19 Mitigation: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey, 2021, JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
  • Using the Internet to access key populations in ecological momentary assessment research: Comparing adherence, reactivity, and erratic responding across those enrolled remotely versus in-person, 2020, Psychological Assessment
  • COVID-19-Related Stressors and Clinical Mental Health Symptoms in a Northeast US Sample, 2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Immune Response to an Acute Moderate Dose of Alcohol in Healthy Young Adults, 2020, Alcohol and Alcoholism

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Monti include:

  • Christopher W. Kahler
  • Mollie A. Monnig
  • David G. Zelaya
  • Anthony Surace
  • Nadine R. Mastroleo

In 1992, Peter M. Monti was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department

    Peter M Monti;Suzanne M Colby;Nancy P Barnett;Anthony Spirito

  • Relevance of Cue Reactivity to Understanding Alcohol and Smoking Relapse

    Raymond S. Niaura;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Jody A. Binkoff;Jody A. Binkoff;Peter M. Monti;Peter M. Monti

  • Treating Alcohol Dependence: A Coping Skills Training Guide

    Peter M Monti;Ronald M Kadden;Damaris J Rohsenow;Ned L Cooney

  • Brief motivational interviewing in a hospital setting for adolescent smoking: a preliminary study.

    Suzanne M. Colby;Peter M. Monti;Nancy P. Barnett;Damaris J. Rohsenow

  • A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department

    Anthony Spirito;Peter M. Monti;Nancy P. Barnett;Suzanne M. Colby

  • Reactivity of alcoholics and nonalcoholics to drinking cues

    Peter M. Monti;Jody A. Binkoff;David B. Abrams;William R. Zwick;William R. Zwick

  • Cognitive behavioural coping skills therapy manual: a clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence,

    Ronald M Kadden;Carroll Kathleen;Dennis M Donovan;Ned L. Cooney

  • The effect of couples training and partner co-operativeness in the behavioral treatment of obesity.

    Kelly D. Brownell;Carol L. Heckerman;Robert J. Westlake;Steven C. Hayes

  • Cue Reactivity in Addictive Behaviors: Theoretical and Treatment Implications

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Anna Rose Childress;Peter M. Monti;Raymond S. Niaura

  • Motivational enhancement and other brief interventions for adolescent substance abuse: foundations, applications and evaluations.

    Tracy OâLeary Tevyaw;Peter M. Monti

  • Alcohol demand, delayed reward discounting, and craving in relation to drinking and alcohol use disorders.

    James MacKillop;Robert Miranda Jr.;Peter M. Monti;Lara A. Ray

  • Reactivity to smoking cues and relapse: two studies of discriminant validity.

    David B. Abrams;David B. Abrams;Peter M. Monti;Peter M. Monti;Kate B. Carey;Kate B. Carey;Rodger P. Pinto

  • Cue Exposure With Coping Skills Treatment for Male Alcoholics A Preliminary Investigation

    Peter M. Monti;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Anthony V. Rubonis;Raymond S. Niaura

  • Treatment of Co-Occurring Substance Abuse and Suicidality Among Adolescents: A Randomized Trial

    Christianne Esposito-Smythers;Anthony Spirito;Christopher W. Kahler;Jeffrey Hunt

  • Naltrexone and cue exposure with coping and communication skills training for alcoholics: treatment process and 1-year outcomes.

    Peter M. Monti;Peter M. Monti;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Robert M. Swift;Robert M. Swift;Suzy B. Gulliver

  • Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.

    Nancy P. Barnett;James G. Murphy;Suzanne M. Colby;Peter M. Monti;Peter M. Monti

  • Adolescence: booze, brains, and behavior.

    Peter M. Monti;Robert Miranda;Kimberly Nixon;Kenneth J. Sher

  • Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking

    Peter M. Monti;Nancy P. Barnett;Suzanne M. Colby;Chad J. Gwaltney

  • Cue reactivity as a predictor of drinking among male alcoholics.

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Peter M. Monti;Anthony V. Rubonis;Alan D. Sirota

  • Screening adolescents for problem drinking: performance of brief screens against DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses.

    Tammy Chung;Suzanne M. Colby;Nancy P. Barnett;Damaris J. Rohsenow

Frequent Co-Authors

Damaris J. Rohsenow
Damaris J. Rohsenow Brown University
Suzanne M. Colby
Suzanne M. Colby Brown University
Nancy P. Barnett
Nancy P. Barnett Brown University
David B. Abrams
David B. Abrams New York University
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Robert M. Swift
Robert M. Swift Brown University
Rosemarie A. Martin
Rosemarie A. Martin Brown University
Jennifer W. Tidey
Jennifer W. Tidey Brown University
Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
Robert Miranda
Robert Miranda Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of online programs and diverse career paths. Many students choose to earn advanced degrees, such as a master’s in counseling or clinical psychology, to become licensed professionals. Studying online offers flexibility and access to specialized programs tailored to individual career goals.

Becoming a licensed therapist requires meeting strict educational and licensure requirements, which vary by location. For example, those interested in practicing in Oklahoma can learn how to become a licensed therapist in Tulsa. Aspiring professionals in Virginia can explore the Virginia Beach licensed therapist education requirements to understand the necessary credentials.

In metropolitan areas, requirements may be different or more specific. To find out how to become a licensed therapist in Washington DC, students should research both state regulations and local procedures. Meanwhile, candidates planning to work in Kansas can follow the Wichita licensed therapist requirements for a smooth licensure process.

Exploring online degrees and state-specific pathways ensures you are prepared for both academic success and the unique licensing demands of your chosen location.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Monti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles