World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
102
Citations
34712
World Ranking
577
National Ranking
364

Kate B. Carey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate B. Carey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 437 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kate B. Carey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate B. Carey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kate B. Carey is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on epidemiology and applied psychology. Their research encompasses topics related to substance abuse treatment, behavioral health interventions, and alcohol consumption effects.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Kate B. Carey's frequent publication venues illustrate the focus and reach of their research. These venues include:

  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The scientist has collaborated with several researchers multiple times, including:

  • Jennifer E. Merrill
  • Angelo M. DiBello
  • Holly K. Boyle
  • Mary Beth Miller
  • Nancy P. Barnett

Key recent publications illustrate the range and focus of their work:

  • The impact of menthol flavoring in combusted tobacco on alternative product purchasing: A pilot study using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)
  • The relationship between unplanned drinking and event-level alcohol-related outcomes (2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • Feasibility and acceptability of a digital health intervention to promote engagement in and adherence to medication for opioid use disorder (2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment)
  • Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Among US Veterans (2023, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • Simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use among college students in the United States, 2006-2019 (2022, Addictive Behaviors Reports)

Best Publications

  • Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research

    Brian Borsari;Kate B Carey

  • Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration.

    Brian Borsari;Kate B Carey

  • Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness.

    Robert E. Drake;Susan M. Essock;Andrew Shaner;Kate B. Carey

  • Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

    Kate B. Carey;Lori A.J. Scott-Sheldon;Michael P. Carey;Kelly S. DeMartini

  • Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.

    Brian Borsari;Kate B. Carey

  • The sexual desire inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability

    Ilana P. Spector;Michael P. Carey;Lynne Steinberg

  • Validating a Five-Factor Marijuana Motives Measure: Relations with Use, Problems, and Alcohol Motives.

    Jeffrey Simons;Christopher J. Correia;Kate B. Carey;Brian E. Borsari

  • Methodological Challenges in Research on Sexual Risk Behavior: II. Accuracy of Self-Reports

    Kerstin E. E. Schroder;Michael P. Carey;Peter A. Vanable

  • A Follow-Up Psychometric Analysis of the Self-Regulation Questionnaire

    Dan J. Neal;Kate B. Carey

  • Prevalence of sexual dysfunctions: results from a decade of research.

    Jeffrey S. Simons;Michael P. Carey

  • Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007.

    David B. Portnoy;Lori A.J. Scott-Sheldon;Blair T. Johnson;Michael P. Carey

  • A psychometric analysis of the self-regulation questionnaire.

    Kate B. Carey;Dan J. Neal;Susan E. Collins

  • Drinking motives predict alcohol-related problems in college students

    Kate B. Carey;Christopher J. Correia

  • Psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in psychiatric outpatients.

    Karen M. Cocco;Kate B. Carey

  • Anger toward God: Social-cognitive predictors, prevalence, and links with adjustment to bereavement and cancer.

    Julie J. Exline;Crystal L. Park;Joshua M. Smyth;Michael P. Carey

  • Does Alcohol Lead to Sexual Risk Behavior? Findings from Event-Level Research

    Lance S. Weinhardt;Michael P. Carey

  • Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale

    Arthur W. Frenz;Michael P. Carey;Randall S. Jorgensen

  • Assessing Readiness to Change Substance Abuse: A Critical Review of Instruments

    Kate B. Carey;Daniel M. Purnine;Stephen A. Maisto;Michael P. Carey

  • Use of the AUDIT and the DAST-10 to identify alcohol and drug use disorders among adults with a severe and persistent mental illness.

    Stephen A. Maisto;Michael P. Carey;Kate B. Carey;Christopher M. Gordon

  • Associations Among Health Behaviors and Time Perspective in Young Adults: Model Testing with Boot-Strapping Replication

    James M. Henson;James M. Henson;Michael P. Carey;Kate B. Carey;Stephen A. Maisto

  • Computer‐delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta‐analysis

    Kate B. Carey;Lori A. J. Scott-Sheldon;Jennifer C. Elliott;Jamie R. Bolles

  • Enhancing motivation to reduce the risk of HIV infection for economically disadvantaged urban women.

    Michael P. Carey;Stephen A. Maisto;Seth C. Kalichman;Andrew D. Forsyth

  • Reactivity to smoking cues and relapse: two studies of discriminant validity.

    David B. Abrams;David B. Abrams;Peter M. Monti;Peter M. Monti;Kate B. Carey;Kate B. Carey;Rodger P. Pinto

  • Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.

    Kate B. Carey;Michael P. Carey;Stephen A. Maisto;James M. Henson

  • Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010.

    Kate B. Carey;Lori A.J. Scott-Sheldon;Lori A.J. Scott-Sheldon;Jennifer C. Elliott;Lorra Garey

  • A comparison of motives for marijuana and alcohol use among experienced users.

    Jeffrey Simons;Christopher J Correia;Kate B Carey

  • Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.

    Brian Borsari;Kate B. Carey

  • Optimizing the use of the AUDIT for alcohol screening in college students.

    Kelly S. DeMartini;Kate B. Carey

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Carey
Michael P. Carey Brown University
Stephen A. Maisto
Stephen A. Maisto Syracuse University
Brian Borsari
Brian Borsari University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey S. Simons
Jeffrey S. Simons University of South Dakota
Leickness C. Simbayi
Leickness C. Simbayi Human Sciences Research Council
Demetria Cain
Demetria Cain City University of New York
Peter A. Vanable
Peter A. Vanable Syracuse University
Christopher J. Correia
Christopher J. Correia Auburn University
Lance S. Weinhardt
Lance S. Weinhardt University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of online degree options. For those seeking flexible paths, many universities now offer online counseling programs tailored to different needs and schedules. If you’re looking for accessible academic routes, Review the easiest online counseling degree programs ranking in America to discover programs with supportive admission criteria and student-centered learning.

Location-specific programs are also available for added convenience. Prospective students in Virginia can explore lists of Virginia easiest counseling degrees online that combine academic value with flexibility. In California, those eager to enter the workforce more quickly may consider the California accelerated counseling programs online designed for speedy completion.

Similarly, Floridians can opt for the fastest online counseling programs in Florida that provide efficient pathways to licensure and practice. No matter your location or pace, online degrees in psychology and counseling make it easier to balance education and life while preparing for rewarding careers in mental health and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Kate B. Carey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles