World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
43143
World Ranking
6000
National Ranking
3208

Bradford J. Wood publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradford J. Wood sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 927 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bradford J. Wood D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradford J. Wood sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradford J. Wood is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research contributions span the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Oncology.

Their recent academic publications reflect an emphasis on diagnostic and treatment methodologies, especially in the context of prostate cancer and COVID-19. Significant recent papers include:

  • "MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis" (2020) published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19" (2021) published in Nature Medicine
  • "Artificial intelligence for the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT using multinational datasets" (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • "Generalizing Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation to Unseen Domains via Deep Stacked Transformation" (2020) published in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • "Single-cell atlas of tumor cell evolution in response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma" (2021) published in Journal of Hepatology

The key areas of research topics associated with Bradford J. Wood include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

Bradford J. Wood has frequently collaborated with several researchers, among whom the most common co-authors are:

  • Barış Türkbey
  • Peter A. Pinto
  • Peter L. Choyke
  • Maria J. Merino
  • Stephanie A. Harmon

Their work has been published extensively in several scientific journals. The primary publication venues where Bradford J. Wood has contributed the most are:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Academic Radiology
  • CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

This profile reflects Bradford J. Wood's multidisciplinary focus that integrates clinical medicine with advanced imaging techniques and computational methods, particularly addressing challenges in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and the analysis of respiratory diseases such as COVID-19.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion–Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

    M. Minhaj Siddiqui;M. Minhaj Siddiqui;Soroush Rais-Bahrami;Soroush Rais-Bahrami;Baris Turkbey;Arvin K. George

  • Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Tremelimumab in combination with ablation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Austin G. Duffy;Susanna V. Ulahannan;Oxana Makorova-Rusher;Osama Rahma

  • MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

    Michael Ahdoot;Andrew R Wilbur;Sarah E Reese;Amir H Lebastchi

  • Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

    Ittai Dayan;Holger R. Roth;Aoxiao Zhong;Ahmed Harouni

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Peter A. Pinto;Paul H. Chung;Ardeshir R. Rastinehad;Angelo A. Baccala

  • Tumor Cell Biodiversity Drives Microenvironmental Reprogramming in Liver Cancer

    Lichun Ma;Maria O. Hernandez;Yongmei Zhao;Monika Mehta

  • Artificial intelligence for the detection of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT using multinational datasets.

    Stephanie A. Harmon;Thomas H. Sanford;Sheng Xu;Evrim B. Turkbey

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Significantly Upgrades Prostate Cancer Versus Systematic 12-core Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy

    M. Minhaj Siddiqui;Soroush Rais-Bahrami;Hong Truong;Lambros Stamatakis

  • Pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound and low temperature-sensitive liposomes for enhanced targeted drug delivery and antitumor effect.

    Sergio Dromi;Victor Frenkel;Alfred Luk;Bryan Traughber

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria

    S. Nahum Goldberg;J. William Charboneau;Gerald D. Dodd;Damian E. Dupuy

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

    S. Nahum Goldberg;Clement J. Grassi;John F. Cardella;J. William Charboneau

  • Generalizing Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation to Unseen Domains via Deep Stacked Transformation

    Ling Zhang;Xiaosong Wang;Dong Yang;Thomas Sanford

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?

    Baris Turkbey;Vijay P. Shah;Yuxi Pang;Marcelino Bernardo

  • PERCUTANEOUS RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS: INITIAL RESULTS

    Christian P. Pavlovich;McCLELLAN M. Walther;Peter L. Choyke;Stephen E. Pautler

  • Radio-frequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: early clinical experience.

    D A Gervais;F J McGovern;B J Wood;S N Goldberg

  • Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging.

    Berrend G. Muller;Joanna H. Shih;Sandeep Sankineni;Jamie Marko;Jamie Marko

  • Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies.

    Sheng Xu;Jochen Kruecker;Baris Turkbey;Neil Glossop

  • Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation of Abdominal Tumors: Lessons Learned from Complications

    Hyunchul Rhim;Gerald D. Dodd;Kedar N. Chintapalli;Bradford J. Wood

Frequent Co-Authors

Baris Turkbey
Baris Turkbey National Institutes of Health
Peter L. Choyke
Peter L. Choyke National Institutes of Health
Peter A. Pinto
Peter A. Pinto National Institutes of Health
Maria J. Merino
Maria J. Merino National Institutes of Health
Pingkun Yan
Pingkun Yan Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
W. Marston Linehan
W. Marston Linehan National Institutes of Health
Tim F. Greten
Tim F. Greten National Institutes of Health
David L. Woods
David L. Woods University of California, Davis
David E. Kleiner
David E. Kleiner National Institutes of Health
Seth M. Steinberg
Seth M. Steinberg National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring options beyond traditional medical programs, many online healthcare degrees can fast-track your entry into medical and allied health fields. Nursing is a popular and flexible career pathway, and there’s a growing variety of accessible and affordable online degree options.

For aspiring nurses, the cheapest online bsn programs offer a budget-friendly path to earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Current registered nurses looking to advance can consider doctorate in nursing education online programs to deepen their expertise and open doors to teaching or leadership roles.

Non-nursing graduates can change careers efficiently with online direct entry msn degrees, specially designed for those seeking to transition into nursing without prior credentials. If you’re focused on accessibility and admission rates, exploring easy nursing schools to get into can help you identify schools with less competitive entry requirements.

From affordable bachelor’s degrees to advanced doctoral programs, online pathways can lead to rewarding healthcare careers without the traditional time and cost barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Bradford J. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles