World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
17431
World Ranking
2219
National Ranking
1057

David L. Woods publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Woods sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David L. Woods D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Woods sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Woods is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their main field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Surgery, and Clinical Psychology.

The primary research topics covered by Woods include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Woods has contributed to various publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Woods include the following:

  • Mindfulness-based therapy compared to cognitive behavioral therapy for opioid-treated chronic low back pain: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 2021, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • The California Cognitive Assessment Battery (CCAB), 2024, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Effects of Aging, Sex and Forgetfulness on Mental Rotation Performance, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Interference and Facilitation Effects on Stroop-like Tasks in Older Adults, 2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Structured Psychological Support for people with probable personality disorder in mental health services in England: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial, 2024, BMJ Open

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Timothy J. Herron
  • Juliana V. Baldo
  • Kathleen Hall
  • Michael Blank
  • Jas M. Chok

Best Publications

  • Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex

    Scott O. Murray;Daniel Kersten;Bruno A. Olshausen;Paul Schrater

  • Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3.

    Robert T. Knight;Donatella Scabini;David L. Woods;Clay C. Clayworth

  • Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.

    Kimmo Alho;David L. Woods;Alain Algazi;Risto Näätänen

  • Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory.

    David L Woods;Mark M. Kishiyama;E. William Yund;Timothy J. Herron

  • A distributed cortical network for auditory sensory memory in humans.

    Claude Alain;David L. Woods;Robert T. Knight

  • Evoked potential audiometry.

    Picton Tw;Woods Dl;Baribeau-Braun J;Healey Tm

  • Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity.

    K. Alho;David L Woods;A. Algazi;R. T. Knight

  • Attentional modulation of human auditory cortex.

    Christopher I Petkov;Xiaojian Kang;Kimmo Alho;Olivier Bertrand

  • Intracerebral sources of human auditory-evoked potentials.

    Terence Picton;C. Alain;David L Woods;M. S. John

  • Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.

    David L Woods;John M. Wyma;E. William Yund;Timothy J. Herron

  • The effects of frontal cortex lesions on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention

    Robert T. Knight;Robert T. Knight;Steven A. Hillyard;Steven A. Hillyard;David L. Woods;David L. Woods;Helen J. Neville;Helen J. Neville

  • The effects of frontal and temporal-parietal lesions on the auditory evoked potential in man

    Robert T. Knight;Steven A. Hillyard;David L. Woods;Helen J. Neville

  • Prefrontal cortex gating of auditory transmission in humans

    Robert T. Knight;Donatella Scabini;David L. Woods

  • Generators of middle- and long-latency auditory evoked potentials: implications from studies of patients with bitemporal lesions.

    David L Woods;C.C Clayworth;R.T Knight;G.V Simpson

  • Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractibility after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions.

    David L. Woods;Robert T. Knight

  • Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.

    David L. Woods;Kimmo Alho;Alain Algazi

  • Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory.

    Claude Alain;David L. Woods

  • Anatomical and physiological substrates of event-related potentials. Two case studies.

    Charles C. Wood;Gregory McCARTHY;Nancy K. Squires;Herbert G. Vaughan

  • Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships

    T. W. Picton;T. W. Picton;David L Woods;David L Woods;G. B. Proulx;G. B. Proulx

  • The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones.

    David L Woods;David L Woods;Robert Elmasian;Robert Elmasian

  • The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies.

    David L. Woods

Frequent Co-Authors

E. William Yund
E. William Yund University of California, Davis
Bradford J. Wood
Bradford J. Wood National Institutes of Health
Claude Alain
Claude Alain University of Toronto
Andrew L. Lewis
Andrew L. Lewis BioCity Nottingham
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Kimmo Alho
Kimmo Alho University of Helsinki
Shihui Han
Shihui Han Peking University
Bruce R Reed
Bruce R Reed University of California, Davis
Teemu Rinne
Teemu Rinne University of Helsinki
Steven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David L. Woods

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles