World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1638 973 168 24838
Neuroscience 77 1814 873 170 24841

Helen J. Neville publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helen J. Neville between 1974 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helen J. Neville published across 49 years, from 1974 to 2022, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1998. 1 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1998. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1974 2022

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helen J. Neville: publications per year, 1974 to 2022
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 2
1981 1
1982 5
1983 1
1984 4
1985 3
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 2
1992 3
1993 3
1994 2
1995 1
1996 6
1997 5
1998 10
1999 4
2000 6
2001 8
2002 9
2003 5
2004 4
2005 6
2006 7
2007 3
2008 7
2009 8
2010 4
2011 4
2012 4
2013 8
2014 4
2015 7
2016 2
2017 5
2018 4
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 172
Download as CSV

Helen J. Neville publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Neville sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Helen J. Neville D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen J. Neville sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2013 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1977 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Helen J. Neville was affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States. Their research focused on topics within computer science, particularly artificial intelligence, and intersected with geochemistry and geologic mapping.

The scientist contributed to the field through research published in venues such as Restoration Ecology. One of their recent papers is titled "Time series analysis to demonstrate restoration outcomes and system change from satellite data", published in 2025 in Restoration Ecology.

Throughout their career, Helen J. Neville collaborated with various researchers. Frequent co-authors included:

  • Nicholas E. Kolarik
  • Carolyn Koehn
  • Erik Nati-Johnson
  • Juan C. Rojas Lucero
  • Colin Martin

The scientist's involvement spanned across main and subfields of study as follows:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

The primary topics that appeared in their work were:

  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping

Helen J. Neville received several recognitions, including:

  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2014)
  • William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA) (2013)
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1977)

The scientist was deceased at the time of this profile's compilation. Their contributions to their areas of research, collaboration networks, and recognition in the scientific community remain as part of the scholarly record.

Best Publications

  • Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?

    Daphne Bavelier;Helen J. Neville

  • Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: Erp and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers

    Christine M. Weber-Fox;Helen J. Neville

  • Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials

    Helen Neville;Janet L. Nicol;Andrew Barss;Kenneth I. Forster

  • Auditory and Visual Semantic Priming in Lexical Decision: A Comparison Using Event-related Brain Potentials

    Phillip J. Holcomb;Helen J. Neville

  • Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans

    Brigitte Röder;Wolfgang Teder-Sälejärvi;Anette Sterr;Frank Rösler

  • Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience

    Helen J. Neville;Daphne Bavelier;David Corina;Josef Rauschecker

  • Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods

    Helen J. Neville;Debra L. Mills;Donald S. Lawson

  • Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults

    Helen J. Neville;Donald Lawson

  • Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words

    Helen J Neville;Marta Kutas;Greg Chesney;Albert L Schmidt

  • Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals.

    Daphné Bavelier;Andrea Tomann;C Hutton;Teresa Mitchell

  • Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event‐related brain potential study

    Courtney Stevens;Brittni Lauinger;Helen Neville

  • Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans.

    Brigitte Röder;Oliver Stock;Siegfried Bien;Helen Neville

  • Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event‐related brain potentials

    Phillip J. Holcomb;Sharon A. Coffey;Helen J. Neville

  • Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing

    Daphne Bavelier;Craig Brozinsky;Andrea Tomann;Teresa Mitchell

  • The neurobiology of sensory and language processing in language-impaired children

    Helen J. Neville;Sharon A. Coffey;Phillip J. Holcomb;Paula Tallal

  • Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers

    Helen J. Neville;Courtney Stevens;Eric Pakulak;Theodore A. Bell

  • Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months

    Debra L. Mills;Sharon Coffey‐Corina;Helen J. Neville

  • Neural systems mediating American sign language: effects of sensory experience and age of acquisition.

    Helen J. Neville;Sharon A. Coffey;Donald S. Lawson;Andrew Fischer

  • Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials

    Phillip J. Holcomb;Helen J. Neville

  • The effects of frontal cortex lesions on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention

    Robert T. Knight;Robert T. Knight;Steven A. Hillyard;Steven A. Hillyard;David L. Woods;David L. Woods;Helen J. Neville;Helen J. Neville

Frequent Co-Authors

Daphne Bavelier
Daphne Bavelier University of Geneva
David P. Corina
David P. Corina University of California, Davis
Debra L. Mills
Debra L. Mills Bangor University
Brigitte Röder
Brigitte Röder Universität Hamburg
Steven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard University of California, San Diego
Frank Rösler
Frank Rösler Universität Hamburg
Peter Jezzard
Peter Jezzard University of Oxford
Phillip J. Holcomb
Phillip J. Holcomb San Diego State University
Ursula Bellugi
Ursula Bellugi Salk Institute for Biological Studies
David L. Woods
David L. Woods University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology students in the USA often pursue related fields to expand their career options or deepen their expertise. One popular pathway is social work, which aligns closely with psychology and offers a wide range of opportunities to support individuals and communities.

For those interested in social work careers, pursuing an affordable online social work master's degrees in USA can be a practical and flexible option. Many universities across the country now offer high-quality programs online, making it easier to balance studies with existing responsibilities.

Regional offerings are also expanding, with affordable online social work degrees in Ohio and the most affordable online social work degree programs in Tennessee available for local students. For those looking for even lower tuition rates, consider the cheapest social work degrees in Arkansas.

Pursuing online social work degrees not only increases your competitive edge but also paves the way for diverse roles in counseling, human services, and community outreach, all while ensuring affordability and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Helen J. Neville

Recently Published Articles