World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
9587
World Ranking
5130
National Ranking
300

Maurice Ptito publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurice Ptito sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 255 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maurice Ptito D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurice Ptito sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maurice Ptito is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cellular and molecular neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, and molecular biology.

The primary topics Maurice Ptito investigates include tactile and sensory interactions, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, visual perception and processing mechanisms, advanced MRI techniques and applications, gaze tracking and assistive technology, neural dynamics and brain function, and neuroscience and neural engineering.

They have coauthored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators, including Maxime Bleau, Ron Kupers, Tim B. Dyrby, Daniel-Robert Chebat, and Jean-François Bouchard. Their work is frequently published in venues such as Cells, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Scientific Reports, Sensors, and Brain Sciences.

Several recent papers by Maurice Ptito and colleagues include:

  • "The Retina: A Window into the Brain," 2021, published in Cells
  • "Brain-Machine Interfaces to Assist the Blind," 2021, published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Other notable publications connected with their research area, though authored by collaborators, are:

  • "Axon morphology is modulated by the local environment and impacts the noninvasive investigation of its structure-function relationship," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Differences in Frontal Network Anatomy Across Primate Species," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "The functional characterization of callosal connections," 2021, Progress in Neurobiology

Maurice Ptito has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a recent title published by Frontiers Media in 2023 called "Brain Plasticity Following Sensory Loss: From Basic Mechanisms to Therapy."

Best Publications

  • Orientationally invariant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion MRI

    Daniel C. Alexander;Penny L. Hubbard;Matt G. Hall;Elizabeth A. Moore

  • Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind.

    Maurice Ptito;Solvej M Moesgaard;Albert Gjedde;Rron Kupers

  • Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation.

    Ron Kupers;Ron Kupers;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito

  • Alterations of the visual pathways in congenital blindness.

    Maurice Ptito;Fabien C. G. Schneider;Olaf B. Paulson;Ron Kupers

  • Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness

    Ron Kupers;Daniel R. Chebat;Kristoffer H. Madsen;Olaf B. Paulson

  • Contrast and stability of the axon diameter index from microstructure imaging with diffusion MRI.

    Tim B Dyrby;Lise V Sogaard;Matt G Hall;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex induces somatotopically organized qualia in blind subjects

    Ron Kupers;Arnaud Fumal;Alain Maertens de Noordhout;Albert Gjedde

  • Beyond visual, aural and haptic movement perception: hMT+ is activated by electrotactile motion stimulation of the tongue in sighted and in congenitally blind individuals

    Isabelle Matteau;Ron Kupers;Emiliano Ricciardi;Pietro Pietrini

  • Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals.

    Daniel-Robert Chebat;Fabien C. Schneider;Ron Kupers;Maurice Ptito

  • Blindsight in hemispherectomized patients as revealed by spatial summation across the vertical meridian

    F. Tomaiuolo;M. Ptito;Carlo Alberto Marzi;T. Paus

  • Interpolation of diffusion weighted imaging datasets.

    Tim B. Dyrby;Henrik Lundell;Mark W. Burke;Nina Linde Reislev

  • The Nature of Consciousness in the Visually Deprived Brain

    Ron Kupers;Pietro Pietrini;Emiliano Ricciardi;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito

  • TMS of the occipital cortex induces tactile sensations in the fingers of blind Braille readers

    M. Ptito;M. Ptito;A. Fumal;A. Martens de Noordhout;J. Schoenen

  • Tactile-'visual' acuity of the tongue in early blind individuals.

    Daniel-Robert Chebat;Constant Rainville;Ron Kupers;Maurice Ptito

  • Neural correlates of olfactory processing in congenital blindness

    R. Kupers;M. Beaulieu-Lefebvre;F.C. Schneider;F.C. Schneider;T. Kassuba

  • Concerted Action of CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor and Deleted in Colorectal Cancer in Axon Guidance

    Anteneh Argaw;Gabriel Duff;Nawal Zabouri;Bruno Cécyre

  • Short parietal lobe connections of the human and monkey brain

    Marco Catani;Naianna Robertsson;Ahmad Beyh;Vincent Huynh

  • Cross-modal plasticity in early blindness.

    Maurice Ptito;Ron Kupers

  • Crossmodal recruitment of the ventral visual stream in congenital blindness.

    Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito;Maurice Ptito;Isabelle Matteau;Arthur Zhi Wang;Olaf B. Paulson

  • Cortical representation of inward and outward radial motion in man

    Maurice Ptito;Ron Kupers;Jocelyn Faubert;Albert Gjedde

  • TARGET DETECTION AND MOVEMENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE BLIND FIELD OF HEMISPHERECTOMIZED PATIENTS

    A. Ptito;F. Lepore;M. Ptito;M. Lassonde

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron Kupers
Ron Kupers University of Montreal
Franco Lepore
Franco Lepore University of Montreal
Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen
Alain Ptito
Alain Ptito McGill University
Pietro Pietrini
Pietro Pietrini IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Hugo Théoret
Hugo Théoret University of Montreal
Jocelyn Faubert
Jocelyn Faubert University of Montreal
Emiliano Ricciardi
Emiliano Ricciardi IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Olaf B. Paulson
Olaf B. Paulson University of Copenhagen
Poul Jennum
Poul Jennum University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a range of online degrees can complement or broaden your career opportunities. Many choose to pursue fields like counseling, psychology, or therapy, which offer overlapping knowledge and skills.

If you’re considering a career in counseling, it’s wise to look at cacrep accredited schools. These programs meet rigorous standards and prepare you for state licensure. Planning ahead? Comparing the masters in counseling online cost can help you budget for your future studies.

Specialized degrees are also available in fields like marriage and family therapy, with several reputable marriage and family therapy degree online options. For a broader approach, consider a masters of psychology online to gain versatile skills applicable to both research and clinical settings.

By exploring these related online programs, neuroscience students can expand their expertise and unlock diverse career pathways in mental health, research, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Maurice Ptito

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles