World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maryse Lassonde

Maryse Lassonde

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1673 1502 90 78 273 17758

Maryse Lassonde publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maryse Lassonde between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maryse Lassonde published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2013. 1 of the 310 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2013. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1975 2025

310 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maryse Lassonde: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 4
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 3
1992 4
1993 4
1994 9
1995 3
1996 3
1997 6
1998 4
1999 8
2000 10
2001 14
2002 8
2003 3
2004 10
2005 13
2006 18
2007 13
2008 18
2009 18
2010 21
2011 21
2012 18
2013 22
2014 11
2015 19
2016 9
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 310
Download as CSV

Maryse Lassonde publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maryse Lassonde sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 273 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 273
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maryse Lassonde D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maryse Lassonde sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maryse Lassonde is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a specific emphasis on sensory systems. This specialization is reflected in their work on olfactory and sensory function studies.

The scientist has contributed to research exploring olfactory and sensory function, with notable topics in olfactory and sensory function studies, as indicated by multiple publications related to this area.

Maryse Lassonde has coauthored scholarly articles with several researchers, including:

  • Élise B. Barbeau
  • Sophie Bayard
  • Laurent Mottron
  • Keven Lapointe
  • Sabrina Suffren

Their recent publication includes a paper titled "Odor localization in structural interhemispheric deficits", published in 2025 in Chemical Senses. This paper reflects their ongoing involvement in the study of sensory systems, particularly related to olfactory processing.

Maryse Lassonde's research output has appeared in the Chemical Senses journal, which is among their frequent venues for publication. Their scholarship centers on exploring neurological and sensory processing mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects

    N. Lessard;M. Paré;F. Lepore;M. Lassonde

  • Neuropsychology: Pitch discrimination in the early blind

    Frédéric Gougoux;Franco Lepore;Maryse Lassonde;Patrice Voss

  • Brain function decline in healthy retired athletes who sustained their last sports concussion in early adulthood

    Louis De Beaumont;Hugo Théoret;David Mongeon;Julie Messier

  • A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Sound Localization: Visual Cortex Activity Predicts Performance in Early-Blind Individuals

    Frédéric Gougoux;Robert J Zatorre;Maryse Lassonde;Patrice Voss

  • Audio-visual integration of emotion expression.

    Olivier Collignon;Simon Girard;Frederic Gosselin;Sylvain Roy

  • Early- and Late-Onset Blind Individuals Show Supra-Normal Auditory Abilities in Far-Space

    Patrice Voss;Maryse Lassonde;Frederic Gougoux;Madeleine Fortin

  • Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects.

    Olivier Collignon;Olivier Collignon;Patrice Voss;Maryse Lassonde;Franco Lepore

  • Functional specialization for auditory–spatial processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind humans

    Olivier Collignon;Gilles Vandewalle;Patrice Voss;Geneviève Albouy

  • Acute and Chronic Changes in Diffusivity Measures after Sports Concussion

    Luke C. Henry;Julie Tremblay;Sebastien Tremblay;Agatha Lee

  • Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users

    M. E. Doucet;F. Bergeron;M. Lassonde;P. Ferron

  • Long-term and cumulative effects of sports concussion on motor cortex inhibition

    Louis De Beaumont;Maryse Lassonde;Suzanne Leclerc;Hugo Théoret

  • Neurometabolic changes in the acute phase after sports concussions correlate with symptom severity.

    Luke C. Henry;Sébastien Tremblay;Yvan Boulanger;Dave Ellemberg

  • Deficits in executive functions and motor coordination in children with frontal lobe epilepsy

    Maria Teresa Hernandez;Hannelore C Sauerwein;Isabelle Jambaqué;Elaine De Guise

  • Neuropsychological and neurophysiological assessment of sport concussion in children, adolescents and adults

    Annie Baillargeon;Maryse Lassonde;Suzanne Leclerc;Dave Ellemberg

  • Long-term electrophysiological changes in athletes with a history of multiple concussions

    Louis De Beaumont;Benoit Brisson;Maryse Lassonde;Pierre Jolicoeur

  • Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men

    Olivier Collignon;S Girard;Frédéric Gosselin;D Saint-Amour

  • Sleep following sport-related concussions.

    Nadia Gosselin;Maryse Lassonde;Dominique Petit;Suzanne Leclerc

  • Neurophysiological anomalies in symptomatic and asymptomatic concussed athletes.

    Nadia Gosselin;Martin Thériault;Suzanne Leclerc;Jacques Montplaisir

  • Attention, memory, and behavioral adjustment in children with frontal lobe epilepsy.

    Maria-Teresa Hernandez;Hannelore C Sauerwein;Isabelle Jambaqué;Elaine de Guise

  • Sports Concussions and Aging: A Neuroimaging Investigation

    Sebastien Tremblay;Louis De Beaumont;Luke C. Henry;Yvan Boulanger

  • Persistent motor system abnormalities in formerly concussed athletes

    Louis De Beaumont;David Mongeon;Sébastien Tremblay;Julie Messier

  • Hyperbaric oxygen for children with cerebral palsy: a randomised multicentre trial

    Jean-Paul Collet;Michel Vanasse;Pierre Marois;Maxime Amar

Frequent Co-Authors

Franco Lepore
Franco Lepore University of Montreal
Hugo Théoret
Hugo Théoret University of Montreal
Dang Khoa Nguyen
Dang Khoa Nguyen University of Montreal
Olivier Collignon
Olivier Collignon Université Catholique de Louvain
Lionel Carmant
Lionel Carmant University of Montreal
Anne Lortie
Anne Lortie University of Montreal
Alain Bouthillier
Alain Bouthillier University of Montreal
Jacques Montplaisir
Jacques Montplaisir University of Montreal
Olivier Dulac
Olivier Dulac AdPueriVitam
Tore Nielsen
Tore Nielsen University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology, you might also want to explore related fields, such as social work. Both psychology and social work degrees prepare you to make a difference in people’s lives through counseling, support, and advocacy. Today, there are excellent options for pursuing these paths online, providing greater flexibility and access to quality education.

For those living on the West Coast, the best online social work degrees in California offer a variety of accredited programs, making it easier to balance your studies with other commitments. If you’re aiming for the highest credentials, the best online social work doctorate programs in the US can help you reach leadership roles or academic positions.

Learners in the Southeast will find top choices with the best online social work programs in Florida, covering everything from foundational studies to specialized practice areas. Meanwhile, those interested in flexible master’s degrees should consider the top online social work degrees in Massachusetts.

Exploring these online social work pathways can open doors to rewarding careers in mental health, schools, and beyond—making them a valuable complement or alternative to traditional psychology programs.

Best Scientists Citing Maryse Lassonde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles