World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
11308
World Ranking
5278
National Ranking
306

Hugo Théoret publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo Théoret sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 137 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Hugo Théoret D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo Théoret sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hugo Théoret is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada and has a research focus primarily within the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their publication record includes work on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Themes central to Théoret's research include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Muscle activation and electromyography studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and research related to Vestibular and auditory disorders.

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on neurophysiological methods and brain stimulation techniques. Selected publications include:

  • "Dose-response of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study" (2022, Clinical Neurophysiology)
  • "No aftereffects of high current density 10 Hz and 20 Hz tACS on sensorimotor alpha and beta oscillations" (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and H1-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Measures of Excitation and Inhibition Following Lorazepam Administration" (2020, Neuroscience)
  • "Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Contact and Non-Contact University-Level Sport Athletes" (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • "Stability and test-retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS measures of corticospinal and intracortical excitability" (2022, Brain Research)

Frequent collaboration is evident with coauthors including Jean-François Lepage, Jean-Marc Therrien-Blanchet, Marie Chantal Ferland, Maxime Descoteaux, and François Champoux. These partnerships have contributed to multiple publications across a range of journals.

The common venues for Théoret's research dissemination are Neuroscience, Brain Research, Clinical Neurophysiology, Scientific Reports, and the Journal of Neurotrauma. Among these publications, Neuroscience and Brain Research appear most frequently as outlets for their work.

Best Publications

  • Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Paula I. Martin;Marjorie Nicholas;Errol H. Baker

  • Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex.

    Claus C. Hilgetag;Claus C. Hilgetag;Hugo Théoret;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Brain function decline in healthy retired athletes who sustained their last sports concussion in early adulthood

    Louis De Beaumont;Hugo Théoret;David Mongeon;Julie Messier

  • Activation of Prefrontal Cortex by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Appetite for Risk during Ambiguous Decision Making

    Shirley Fecteau;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;David H. Zald;Paola Liguori

  • Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

    H. Théoret;H. Théoret;E. Halligan;M. Kobayashi;F. Fregni

  • The mirror neuron system: grasping others’ actions from birth?

    Jean-François Lepage;Hugo Théoret

  • Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements

    M. Kobayashi;S. Hutchinson;H. Théoret;G. Schlaug

  • Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    E. M. Robertson;H. Théoret;A. Pascual-leone

  • Acute and Chronic Changes in Diffusivity Measures after Sports Concussion

    Luke C. Henry;Julie Tremblay;Sebastien Tremblay;Agatha Lee

  • Long-term and cumulative effects of sports concussion on motor cortex inhibition

    Louis De Beaumont;Maryse Lassonde;Suzanne Leclerc;Hugo Théoret

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia.

    Paula I. Martin;Margaret A. Naeser;Hugo Theoret;Jose Maria Tormos

  • The Uncertain Outcome of Prefrontal tDCS

    Sara Tremblay;Jean-François Lepage;Alex Latulipe-Loiselle;Felipe Fregni

  • EEG evidence for the presence of an action observation-execution matching system in children.

    Jean-François Lepage;Hugo Théoret

  • Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient--case report.

    Margaret A Naeser;Paula I Martin;Marjorie Nicholas;Errol H Baker

  • Increased variability of paced finger tapping accuracy following repetitive magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in humans.

    Hugo Théoret;Jasmine Haque;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Sports Concussions and Aging: A Neuroimaging Investigation

    Sebastien Tremblay;Louis De Beaumont;Luke C. Henry;Yvan Boulanger

  • Mutations in DCC Cause Congenital Mirror Movements

    Myriam Srour;Jean-Baptiste Rivière;Jessica M. T. Pham;Marie-Pierre Dubé;Marie-Pierre Dubé

  • Persistent motor system abnormalities in formerly concussed athletes

    Louis De Beaumont;David Mongeon;Sébastien Tremblay;Julie Messier

  • Behavioral and neuroplastic changes in the blind: evidence for functionally relevant cross-modal interactions.

    Hugo Théoret;Lotfi Merabet;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Psychopathy and the mirror neuron system: Preliminary findings from a non-psychiatric sample

    Shirley Fecteau;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Hugo Théoret

  • TARGET ARTICLE WITH COMMENTARIES The mirror neuron system: grasping others' actions from birth?

    Jean-François Lepage;Hugo Théoret

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Maryse Lassonde
Maryse Lassonde University of Montreal
Maurice Ptito
Maurice Ptito University of Montreal
Shirley Fecteau
Shirley Fecteau Université Laval
Felipe Fregni
Felipe Fregni Harvard University
Franco Lepore
Franco Lepore University of Montreal
Guy A. Rouleau
Guy A. Rouleau Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Julien Doyon
Julien Doyon Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Ridha Joober
Ridha Joober Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Margaret A. Naeser
Margaret A. Naeser Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Are you exploring the future career options with a background in neuroscience? There are many routes to consider—both within the field and in related industries. For those who prioritize earning potential, some neuroscience-related programs are among the best degrees to make money, preparing you for high-demand roles in healthcare, biotech, and research.

If flexibility and affordability are important, you can find a range of online colleges that offer neuroscience and closely related majors. These schools often accept FAFSA, making it easier to manage tuition costs while balancing other commitments.

Not ready for a full degree? Consider short certificate programs that pay well. Many online certifications—such as those in data analysis, clinical research, or health informatics—can help you quickly gain job-ready skills relevant to neuroscience careers.

For a more streamlined educational path, explore online college degrees designed for speed and accessibility. These degrees can fast-track your entry into allied health or laboratory roles, providing alternative ways to start or advance your neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing Hugo Théoret

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles