World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret A. Naeser

Margaret A. Naeser

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
11935
World Ranking
4020
National Ranking
1825

Margaret A. Naeser publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret A. Naeser sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 129 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Margaret A. Naeser D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret A. Naeser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret A. Naeser is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and specializes in the field of medicine. Their research work primarily involves subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, ophthalmology, and health information management.

The main topics covered in their publications include:

  • Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
  • Medical and Biological Ozone Research
  • Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
  • Infrared Thermography in Medicine
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research
  • Healthcare Regulation

Margaret A. Naeser has contributed to several research papers, among which notable recent publications include:

  • Transcranial Photobiomodulation Treatment: Significant Improvements in Four Ex-Football Players with Possible Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, 2022, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports
  • Transcranial Photobiomodulation to Improve Cognition in Gulf War Illness, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • TransPhoM-DS Study Grant Report: Rationale and Protocol for Investigating the Efficacy of Low-Power Transcranial Photobiomodulation on Language, Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Down Syndrome, 2024, Photonics
  • Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation to Treat Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: A Randomised Clinical Trial with Extended Treatment, 2025, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Margaret A. Naeser include:

  • Paula I. Martin
  • Michael Ho
  • Maxine Krengel
  • Jeffrey Knight
  • Michael R. Hamblin

Their work has been published in various scientific venues such as:

  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Photonics
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Best Publications

  • Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Paula I. Martin;Marjorie Nicholas;Errol H. Baker

  • Aphasia with predominantly subcortical lesion sites: description of three capsular/putaminal aphasia syndromes.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Michael P. Alexander;Nancy Helm-Estabrooks;Harvey L. Levine

  • Role of low-level laser therapy in neurorehabilitation.

    Javad T. Hashmi;Ying-Ying Huang;Bushra Z. Osmani;Sulbha K. Sharma

  • Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasia profiles

    Michael P. Alexander;Margaret A. Naeser;Carole L. Palumbo

  • Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Carole L. Palumbo;Nancy Helm-Estabrooks;Denise Stiassny-Eder

  • Anatomic basis of transcortical motor aphasia

    Morris Freedman;Michael P. Alexander;Margaret A. Naeser

  • Lesion localization in aphasia with cranial computed tomography and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Exam

    Margaret A. Naeser;Robert W. Hayward

  • Significant improvements in cognitive performance post-transcranial, red/near-infrared light-emitting diode treatments in chronic, mild traumatic brain injury: open-protocol study.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Ross Zafonte;Maxine H. Krengel;Paula I. Martin

  • Generators of middle- and long-latency auditory evoked potentials: implications from studies of patients with bitemporal lesions.

    David L Woods;C.C Clayworth;R.T Knight;G.V Simpson

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia.

    Paula I. Martin;Margaret A. Naeser;Hugo Theoret;Jose Maria Tormos

  • Broca's area aphasias: Aphasia after lesions including the frontal operculum

    Michael P. Alexander;Margaret A. Naeser;Carole Palumbo

  • Improved Cognitive Function After Transcranial, Light-Emitting Diode Treatments in Chronic, Traumatic Brain Injury: Two Case Reports

    Margaret A. Naeser;Anita Saltmarche;Maxine H. Krengel;Michael R. Hamblin

  • Pure word deafness. Analysis of a case with bilateral lesions and a defect at the prephonemic level.

    Sanford H. Auerbach;Terry Allard;Margaret Naeser;Michael P. Alexander

  • The involvement of orbitofrontal cerebrum in cognitive tasks.

    Donald T. Stuss;D. F. Benson;D. F. Benson;W. S. Weir;M. A. Naeser;M. A. Naeser

  • Significant Improvement in Cognition in Mild to Moderately Severe Dementia Cases Treated with Transcranial Plus Intranasal Photobiomodulation: Case Series Report.

    Anita E. Saltmarche;Margaret A. Naeser;Kai Fai Ho;Michael R Hamblin

  • Aphemia. Clinical-anatomic correlations.

    Harold B. Schiff;Michael P. Alexander;Margaret A. Naeser;A. M. Galaburda

  • Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient--case report.

    Margaret A Naeser;Paula I Martin;Marjorie Nicholas;Errol H Baker

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome pain treated with low-level laser and microamperes transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: A controlled study.

    Margaret A. Naeser;Kyung-Ae K. Hahn;Barbara E. Lieberman;Kenneth F. Branco

  • Overt Naming fMRI Pre- and Post-TMS: Two Nonfluent Aphasia Patients, with and without Improved Naming Post-TMS.

    Paula I. Martin;Margaret A. Naeser;Michael Ho;Karl W. Doron

  • Relationship between lesion extent in 'Wernicke's area' on computed tomographic scan and predicting recovery of comprehension in Wernicke's aphasia

    Margaret A. Naeser;Nancy Helm-Estabrooks;Gale Haas;Sanford Auerbach

  • LESION LOCALIZATION IN APHASIA WITH CRANIAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND THE BOSTON DIAGNOSTIC APHASIA EXAM

    Margaret A. Naeser;Robert W. Hayward;Robert Seigel

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Hamblin
Michael R. Hamblin University of Johannesburg
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Michael P. Alexander
Michael P. Alexander Harvard University
Perry F. Renshaw
Perry F. Renshaw University of Utah
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Felipe Fregni
Felipe Fregni Harvard University
Hugo Théoret
Hugo Théoret University of Montreal
Harold Goodglass
Harold Goodglass Boston University
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd University of Utah
Roy H. Hamilton
Roy H. Hamilton University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Margaret A. Naeser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles