World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Harold Goodglass

Harold Goodglass

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
20116
World Ranking
2353
National Ranking
1369

Harold Goodglass publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold Goodglass sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Harold Goodglass D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold Goodglass sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1981 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Harold Goodglass was affiliated with Boston University in the United States during their academic career. The scholar's contributions spanned various areas, with documented recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1981.

Their research portfolio included no recorded recent papers, coauthors, or frequent publication venues in the available data. Likewise, no specific book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study were listed for this individual. Furthermore, no main topics of work were detailed in the shared information.

The lack of detailed data on publications, topics, and collaborative networks limits a comprehensive depiction of their scholarly output. However, the distinction of becoming an AAAS Fellow indicates a level of professional acknowledgment within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • The assessment of aphasia and related disorders

    Harold Goodglass;Edith Kaplan

  • Boston diagnostic aphasia examination

    Harold Goodglass

  • Normative data on the boston diagnostic aphasia examination, parietal lobe battery, and the boston naming Test

    Joan C. Borod;Harold Goodglass;Edith Kaplan

  • Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia

    Sheila E. Blumstein;Sheila E. Blumstein;Errol Baker;Errol Baker;Harold Goodglass;Harold Goodglass

  • Language laterality in left-handed aphasics.

    Harold Goodglass;F. A. Quadfasel

  • Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder

    Gabriele Miceli;Anna Mazzucchi;Lise Menn;Harold Goodglass

  • DISTURBANCE OF GESTURE AND PANTOMIME IN APHASIA

    H. Goodglass;E. Kaplan

  • Production deficits in aphasia: A voice-onset time analysis

    Sheila E Blumstein;Sheila E Blumstein;William E Cooper;William E Cooper;Harold Goodglass;Harold Goodglass;Sheila Statlender;Sheila Statlender

  • Disorders in executive control functions among aphasic and other brain-damaged patients.

    Guila Glosser;Harold Goodglass

  • Picture-naming in aphasia.

    Susan E Kohn;Harold Goodglass

  • Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia.

    Harold Goodglass;Errol Baker

  • Lexical retrieval in healthy aging.

    Marjorie Nicholas;Loraine Obler;Martin Albert;Harold Goodglass

  • Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca's aphasic.

    Harold Goodglass;Jean Berko Gleason;Nancy Ackerman Bernholtz;Mary R. Hyde

  • Narrative Strategies of Aphasic and Normal-Speaking Subjects

    Jean Berko Gleason;Harold Goodglass;Loraine Obler;Eugene Green

  • Some Dimensions of Auditory Language Comprehension in Aphasia.

    Harold Goodglass;Jean Berko Gleason;Mary R. Hyde

  • The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening

    Sheila Blumstein;Harold Goodglass;Vivien Tartter

  • Anomia : neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates

    Harold Goodglass;Arthur Wingfield

  • Agrammatism and inflectional morphology in English.

    Harold Goodglass;Jean Berko

  • The "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon in aphasia

    H. Goodglass;E. Kaplan;S. Weintraub;N. Ackerman

  • Clinical Aspects of Dysphasia

    Martin L. Albert;Harold Goodglass;Nancy A. Helm;Alan B. Rubens

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Wingfield
Arthur Wingfield Brandeis University
Martin L. Albert
Martin L. Albert Boston University
Sheila E. Blumstein
Sheila E. Blumstein Brown University
Nelson Butters
Nelson Butters University of California, San Diego
Edith Kaplan
Edith Kaplan Boston University
Margaret A. Naeser
Margaret A. Naeser Boston University
Laird S. Cermak
Laird S. Cermak Boston University
William P. Milberg
William P. Milberg Boston University
Loraine K. Obler
Loraine K. Obler City University of New York
Sandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a variety of career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health support roles. Many students choose to pursue online degrees for flexibility and convenience, which can lead to careers in areas such as substance abuse counseling, school counseling, or social work.

Those interested in substance abuse counseling should be aware of the specific educational and certification requirements, which can vary by location. For instance, San Francisco substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the need for accredited coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, San Jose substance abuse counselor certification requirements detail the steps needed to become eligible for state credentials.

Aspiring counselors can also explore specific pathways, such as becoming a substance abuse counselor in Santa Ana, which outlines local standards and career opportunities. Alternatively, you might consider learning more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Scottsdale to see how other states set their requirements.

Researching your chosen career’s licensing and educational paths will help you make informed decisions when selecting an online psychology program.

Best Scientists Citing Harold Goodglass

Recently Published Articles