World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
24190
World Ranking
3623
National Ranking
2034

Edith Kaplan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith Kaplan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edith Kaplan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edith Kaplan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Edith Kaplan was affiliated with Boston University in the United States. The body of work includes various contributions in psychology, with recognition from the American Psychological Association, which awarded them the status of Fellow in 1982.

The available data does not list specific research papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Kaplan. Similarly, no detailed information on book publications, fields, subfields, or specific topical focuses in their research was provided.

Kaplan's academic career was marked by their formal association with a major American research institution, indicating involvement in academic and scientific activities consistent with psychological research and scholarship during their professional lifetime.

Best Publications

  • Boston Naming Test

    Edith Kaplan;Harold Goodglass;Sandra Weintraub;Osa Segal

  • Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    Dean C. Delis;Edith Kaplan;Joel H. Kramer

  • Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis

    Morris Freedman;Larry Leach;Edith Kaplan;Gordon Winocur

  • California Verbal Learning Test

    Dean C. Delis;John Freeland;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan

  • Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: an update.

    Dean C. Delis;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan;James Holdnack

  • The 'preclinical phase' of probable Alzheimer's disease. A 13-year prospective study of the Framingham cohort.

    Richard T. Linn;Philip A. Wolf;David L. Bachman;Janice E. Knoefel

  • On the nature and pattern of neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder.

    Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Larry Leach;Edith Kaplan

  • Integrating Clinical Assessment with Cognitive Neuroscience: Construct Validation of the California Verbal Learning Test.

    Dean C. Delis;John Freeland;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan

  • Verbal and design fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

    Juliana V. Baldo;Arthur P. Shimamura;Dean C. Delis;Joel Kramer

  • Normative data on the boston diagnostic aphasia examination, parietal lobe battery, and the boston naming Test

    Joan C. Borod;Harold Goodglass;Edith Kaplan

  • A process approach to neuropsychological assessment.

    Edith Kaplan

  • DISTURBANCE OF GESTURE AND PANTOMIME IN APHASIA

    H. Goodglass;E. Kaplan

  • Guidelines for Neuropsychological Research in Multiple Sclerosis

    Janis M. Peyser;Stephen M. Rao;Nicholas G. LaRocca;Edith Kaplan

  • Speed and memory in the WAIS-III Digit Symbol—Coding subtest across the adult lifespan

    Stephen Joy;Edith Kaplan;Deborah Fein

  • Developmental sex differences in verbal learning

    Joel H. Kramer;Dean C. Delis;Edith Kaplan;Louise O'Donnell

  • Blood pressure and cognitive performance. The Framingham Study.

    Mary E. Farmer;Lon R White;Robert D. Abbott;Steven J. Kittner

  • Methodological issues in screening for dementia: The problem of education adjustment

    Steven J. Kittner;Lon R. White;Mary E. Farmer;Michael Wolz

  • Age effects on executive ability

    Nancy S. Wecker;Joel H. Kramer;Amy Wisniewski;Dean C. Delis

  • The "tip-of-the-tongue" phenomenon in aphasia

    H. Goodglass;E. Kaplan;S. Weintraub;N. Ackerman

  • California Verbal Learning Test--Second Edition

    Dean C. Delis;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan;Beth A. Ober

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego
David J. Libon
David J. Libon Rowan University
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Deborah Fein
Deborah Fein University of Connecticut
Harold Goodglass
Harold Goodglass Boston University
Konstantine K. Zakzanis
Konstantine K. Zakzanis University of Toronto
Melissa Lamar
Melissa Lamar Rush University Medical Center
Philip A. Wolf
Philip A. Wolf Boston University
Morris Freedman
Morris Freedman University of Toronto
Angela L. Jefferson
Angela L. Jefferson Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology often opens the door to numerous online programs and diverse career paths. Many students consider becoming a licensed therapist, but requirements can vary based on location. For instance, you can explore the licensed therapist requirements in North Las Vegas or learn about becoming a licensed therapist in Oakland if you plan to work in those regions.

The path typically involves earning a relevant degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing licensure exams. However, each state may differ in its regulations and required coursework. If you are looking at areas like Oklahoma, review the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Oklahoma City or understand the licensed therapist requirements in Omaha.

Online psychology degrees can offer flexible learning tailored to your career interests. Whether you pursue therapy, counseling, or research, it’s important to check local licensing and accreditation requirements before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Edith Kaplan

Recently Published Articles