World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Morris Freedman

Morris Freedman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
25980
World Ranking
3946
National Ranking
258

Morris Freedman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morris Freedman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Morris Freedman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morris Freedman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Morris Freedman is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has conducted extensive research in the field of medicine, contributing a total of 193 publications. Their work is notably concentrated on psychiatry and mental health, neurology, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The primary focus of Freedman's research covers key topics such as dementia and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, functional brain connectivity studies, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, and cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus.

Freedman has published several papers in prominent scientific venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Progression of Behavioral Disturbances and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia" (2021) in JAMA Network Open
  • "Network structure and transcriptomic vulnerability shape atrophy in frontotemporal dementia" (2022) in Brain
  • "Differential early subcortical involvement in genetic FTD within the GENFI cohort" (2021) in NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Characterizing the Clinical Features and Atrophy Patterns of MAPT-Related Frontotemporal Dementia With Disease Progression Modeling" (2021) in Neurology
  • "A data-driven disease progression model of fluid biomarkers in genetic frontotemporal dementia" (2021) in Brain

Freedman frequently publishes in several core academic journals, including:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Brain
  • Brain Communications
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Collaborative efforts have involved numerous frequent co-authors, with significant partnerships with researchers such as:

  • Maria Carmela Tartaglia
  • Sandra E. Black
  • Mario Masellis
  • Elizabeth Finger
  • David F. Tang-Wai

The scientific portfolio of Morris Freedman exemplifies strong engagement with neurodegenerative disease research through multidisciplinary approaches, spanning molecular, clinical, and imaging studies aimed at understanding progression and mechanisms underlying complex neurological disorders.

Best Publications

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria

    D. Neary;J. S. Snowden;L. Gustafson;U. Passant

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia.

    Ellen Bialystok;Fergus I.M. Craik;Morris Freedman

  • Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis

    Morris Freedman;Larry Leach;Edith Kaplan;Gordon Winocur

  • Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease Bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve

    Fergus I.M. Craik;Ellen Bialystok;Morris Freedman

  • Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of frontotemporal cognitive and behavioural syndromes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Michael J. Strong;Gloria M. Grace;Morris Freedman;Cathy Lomen-Hoerth

  • Presymptomatic cognitive and neuroanatomical changes in genetic frontotemporal dementia in the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study: a cross-sectional analysis

    Jonathan D Rohrer;Jennifer M Nicholas;Jennifer M Nicholas;David M Cash;John van Swieten

  • Clustering and switching on verbal fluency tests in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease

    Angela K. Troyer;Morris Moscovitch;Gordon Winocur;Larry Leach

  • Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome

    Benjamin Lam;Mario Masellis;Morris Freedman;Donald T Stuss

  • Bilateral frontal lobe disease and selective delayed response deficits in humans.

    Morris Freedman;Marlene Oscar-Berman

  • Anatomic basis of transcortical motor aphasia

    Morris Freedman;Michael P. Alexander;Margaret A. Naeser

  • Atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: systematic review

    Philip E Lee;Sudeep S Gill;Morris Freedman;Susan E Bronskill

  • Age at symptom onset and death and disease duration in genetic frontotemporal dementia: an international retrospective cohort study.

    Katrina M. Moore;Jennifer Nicholas;Murray Grossman;Corey T. McMillan

  • Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 3. Mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment without dementia

    Howard Chertkow;Fadi Massoud;Ziad Nasreddine;Sylvie Belleville

  • Frontal lobe functions

    Unknown

  • Orbitofrontal function, object alternation and perseveration.

    Morris Freedman;Sandra Black;Patricia Ebert;Malcolm Binns

  • Functional retrograde amnesia: A quantitative case study.

    Daniel L. Schacter;Paul L. Wang;Endel Tulving;Morris Freedman

  • Abnormal network connectivity in frontotemporal dementia: Evidence for prefrontal isolation

    Norman A.S. Farb;Cheryl L. Grady;Stephen Strother;David F. Tang-Wai;David F. Tang-Wai

  • Different patterns of autobiographical memory loss in semantic dementia and medial temporal lobe amnesia: a challenge to consolidation theory.

    Robyn Westmacott;Larry Leach;Morris Freedman;Morris Moscovitch

  • The contribution of autobiographical significance to semantic memory: evidence from Alzheimer's disease, semantic dementia, and amnesia.

    Robyn Westmacott;Sandra E Black;Morris Freedman;Morris Moscovitch

  • Cognitive deficits in olivopontocerebellar atrophy: implications for the cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer's dementia.

    Stephen J. Kish;Munir El‐Awar;Lawrence Schut;Larry Leach

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Mario Masellis
Mario Masellis Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Ekaterina Rogaeva
Ekaterina Rogaeva University of Toronto
Caroline Graff
Caroline Graff Karolinska University Hospital
Jonathan D. Rohrer
Jonathan D. Rohrer University College London
Jason D. Warren
Jason D. Warren University College London
Malcolm A. Binns
Malcolm A. Binns University of Toronto
Elio Scarpini
Elio Scarpini University of Milan
Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Donald T. Stuss
Donald T. Stuss University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens numerous opportunities, especially with the flexibility of online degrees. Many students choose online programs to pursue licensure as therapists or counselors, which can lead to rewarding positions in mental health services across the United States.

Requirements to become a licensed therapist can vary by state and city. For example, you can learn more about how to become a licensed therapist in Garland or discover the specific licensed therapist requirements in Gilbert. Each location may have unique educational standards, supervised clinical hours, and licensing exams.

If you are interested in other regions, researching Glendale licensed therapist education requirements or reviewing the Greensboro licensed therapist requirements can help you plan the right education and career pathway. Many accredited online degrees align with these requirements, providing a convenient pathway to professional licensure and a fulfilling career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Morris Freedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles