World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
140
Citations
69353
World Ranking
114
National Ranking
69

Neuroscience

D-Index
141
Citations
71604
World Ranking
193
National Ranking
126

Medicine

D-Index
141
Citations
71621
World Ranking
1633
National Ranking
949

Joel H. Kramer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel H. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 564 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joel H. Kramer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel H. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Joel H. Kramer is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broader field of Medicine, with a focus on Neurology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Sleep and related disorders

Kramer's recent publications reflect a focus on neurodegenerative diseases, brain injury outcomes, and sleep quality. Selected papers are:

  • Comorbid neuropathological diagnoses in early versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease (2021, Brain)
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) responses are modulated by total sleep time and wake after sleep onset in healthy older adults (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • Right temporal degeneration and socioemotional semantics: semantic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (2022, Brain)
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Elevated Diffusivity of White Matter Microstructure that Is Independently Associated with Long-Term Outcome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study (2022, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein is a Prognostic Biomarker of Six-Month Disability after Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the TRACK-TBI Study (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)

Frequent coauthors contributing to Kramer's work include:

  • Bruce L. Miller
  • William W. Seeley
  • Lea T. Grinberg
  • Howard J. Rosen
  • Gil D. Rabinovici

Kramer often publishes in venues notable for neurology and neurodegenerative research. These publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Brain
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurology

Best Publications

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    Dean C. Delis;Edith Kaplan;Joel H. Kramer

  • Tau PET patterns mirror clinical and neuroanatomical variability in Alzheimer's disease.

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Daniel R. Schonhaut;Daniel R. Schonhaut;Michael Schöll;Michael Schöll;Samuel N. Lockhart

  • Divergent network connectivity changes in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

    Juan Zhou;Michael D. Greicius;Efstathios D. Gennatas;Matthew E. Growdon

  • Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

    Rebecca Sims;Sven J. Van Der Lee;Adam C. Naj;Céline Bellenguez;Céline Bellenguez

  • Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.

    Howard J. Rosen;M. L. Gorno-Tempini;W. P. Goldman;R. J. Perry

  • Are amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients cognitively normal

    C. Lomen-Hoerth;J. Murphy;S. Langmore;J. H. Kramer

  • California Verbal Learning Test

    Dean C. Delis;John Freeland;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan

  • Predicting regional neurodegeneration from the healthy brain functional connectome.

    Juan Zhou;Efstathios D. Gennatas;Joel H. Kramer;Bruce L. Miller

  • Tau pathology and neurodegeneration contribute to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease.

    Alexandre Bejanin;Daniel R Schonhaut;Renaud La Joie;Joel H Kramer

  • Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

    Elisabeth H. Thijssen;Elisabeth H. Thijssen;Renaud La Joie;Amy Wolf;Amelia Strom

  • Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: an update.

    Dean C. Delis;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan;James Holdnack

  • Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers' Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set (UDS)

    Sandra Weintraub;Lilah Besser;Hiroko H. Dodge;Merilee Teylan

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of cingulum fibers in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease

    Y. Zhang;N. Schuff;G. H. Jahng;W. Bayne

  • Frontal paralimbic network atrophy in very mild behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

    William W. Seeley;Richard Crawford;Katya Rascovsky;Joel H. Kramer

  • The behavioural/dysexecutive variant of Alzheimer's disease: clinical, neuroimaging and pathological features.

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg;David C. Perry;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy

  • Distinctive neuropsychological patterns in frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease.

    Joel H. Kramer;Jennifer Jurik;Sharon J. Sha;Kate P. Rankin

  • Different regional patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia

    An-Tao Du;Norbert Schuff;Joel H. Kramer;Howard J. Rosen

  • Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a retrospective diagnostic performance study.

    Elisabeth H Thijssen;Renaud La Joie;Amelia Strom;Corrina Fonseca

  • Profiles of demented and amnesic patients on the California verbal learning test : implications for the assessment of memory disorders

    Dean C. Delis;Paul J. Massman;Nelson Butters;David P. Salmon

  • Integrating Clinical Assessment with Cognitive Neuroscience: Construct Validation of the California Verbal Learning Test.

    Dean C. Delis;John Freeland;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan

  • California Verbal Learning Test--Second Edition

    Dean C. Delis;Joel H. Kramer;Edith Kaplan;Beth A. Ober

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Howard J. Rosen
Howard J. Rosen University of California, San Francisco
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco
William W. Seeley
William W. Seeley University of California, San Francisco
Katherine P. Rankin
Katherine P. Rankin University of California, San Francisco
Norbert Schuff
Norbert Schuff University of California, San Francisco
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini University of California, San Francisco
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco
Giovanni Coppola
Giovanni Coppola University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to diverse career paths in mental health, counseling, and therapy. As mental health awareness grows, so does the demand for qualified professionals across the United States. Online degrees often offer the flexibility to balance studies with work or family commitments, making it easier for students to pursue their goals from anywhere.

Becoming a licensed therapist is a common goal for many psychology graduates. However, the specific requirements can differ depending on your location. For example, you can learn about Omaha licensed therapist requirements, or review the steps for how to become a licensed therapist in Orlando. You can also explore the necessary qualifications by checking the Philadelphia licensed therapist education requirements, or read about Phoenix licensed therapist requirements.

No matter where you plan to work or study, researching state-specific licensing and educational requirements will help you map out the clearest path from your online psychology degree to a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Joel H. Kramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles