World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5472
World Ranking
9172
National Ranking
3873

Rebecca Rausch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Rausch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rebecca Rausch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Rausch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca Rausch is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields primarily within Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The main areas of study for this scientist include Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Ophthalmology, and Molecular Biology. Research topics are focused on:

  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Rausch has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "The Mental Health of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Review of the Last Five Years of Research," 2025, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Cerebral palsy in children: A clinical practice review," 2024, Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care
  • "Pediatric suicide: Review of a preventable tragedy," 2024, Disease-a-Month
  • "Assessment of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor on Retinal Structure and Visual Function in Rodent Models of Optic Nerve Crush," 2024, Pharmaceuticals
  • "Investigation of Combination Treatment With an Aromatase Inhibitor Exemestane and Carboplatin-Based Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Advanced NSCLC," 2021, JTO Clinical and Research Reports

Frequent co-authors in their publications have included:

  • Dilip R. Patel
  • C. Miller
  • Mark G. Goetting
  • Summer Chahin
  • Patricia A. Young

Rausch's work has appeared repeatedly in venues such as the Journal of Clinical Medicine, Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, Disease-a-Month, Pharmaceuticals, and JTO Clinical and Research Reports.

Best Publications

  • A health-related quality of life instrument for patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery.

    Barbara G. Vickrey;Ron D. Hays;Jason Graber;Rebecca Rausch

  • Correlation of criteria used for localizing epileptic foci in patients considered for surgical therapy of epilepsy.

    Jerome Engel;Rebecca Rausch;Jeffrey P. Lieb;David E. Kuhl

  • Psychological status related to surgical control of temporal lobe seizures.

    Rebecca Rausch;Paul H. Crandall

  • Hippocampal Neuron Loss and Memory Scores Before and After Temporal Lobe Surgery for Epilepsy

    Rebecca Rausch;Thomas L. Babb

  • Outcome assessment for epilepsy surgery: the impact of measuring health-related quality of life.

    Barbara G. Vickrey;Barbara G. Vickrey;Ron D. Hays;Jerome Engel;Karen Spritzer

  • Local cerebral metabolism during partial seizures

    Jerome Engel;David E. Kuhl;Michael E. Phelps;Rebecca Rausch

  • Outcomes in 248 patients who had diagnostic evaluations for epilepsy surgery

    Barbara Vickrey;Ron D. Hays;Ron D. Hays;Rebecca Rausch;Jerome Engel

  • APOE, MAPT, and SNCA genes and cognitive performance in Parkinson disease

    Ignacio F. Mata;James B. Leverenz;Daniel Weintraub;John Q. Trojanowski

  • GBA Variants are associated with a distinct pattern of cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease.

    Ignacio F. Mata;James B. Leverenz;Daniel Weintraub;Daniel Weintraub;John Q. Trojanowski

  • Quality of life of epilepsy surgery patients as compared with outpatients with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and/or depressive symptoms.

    Barbara G. Vickrey;Ron D. Hays;Ron D. Hays;Rebecca Rausch;William W. Sutherling

  • Early and late cognitive changes following temporal lobe surgery for epilepsy

    R. Rausch;S. Kraemer;C.J. Pietras;M. Le

  • Word-Finding Deficits Persist After Left Anterotemporal Lobectomy

    John T. Langfitt;Rebecca Rausch

  • Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, Temporal Lobectomy, and Major Depression

    Lori Altshuler;Rebecca Rausch;Sandra Delrahim;Joanne Kay

  • Memory following intracarotid amobarbital injection contralateral to hippocampal damage.

    Rebecca Rausch;Thomas L. Babb;Jerome Engel;Paul H. Crandall

  • Right-hemisphere language dominance in right-handed epileptic patients.

    Rebecca Rausch;Gregory O. Walsh

  • Olfactory memory in patients with anterior temporal lobectomy.

    Rebecca Rausch;E.A. Serafetinides;Paul H. Crandall

  • Asymmetric interictal glucose hypometabolism and cognitive performance in epileptic patients

    Rebecca Rausch;Thomas R. Henry;Catherine M. Ary;Jerome Engel

  • Review of the 20-year UCLA experience with surgery for epilepsy

    Leslie D. Cahan;William Sutherling;Mary Alyce McCullough;Rebecca Rausch

  • Specific alterations of olfactory function in humans with temporal lobe lesions

    Rebecca Rausch;E. A. Serafetinides

  • Cognitive Profile of LRRK2-related Parkinson’s Disease

    Sindhu Srivatsal;Brenna Cholerton;James B. Leverenz;Zbigniew K. Wszolek

  • A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary

    Rebecca Rausch

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerome Engel
Jerome Engel University of California, Los Angeles
Ron D. Hays
Ron D. Hays University of California, Los Angeles
Paul H. Crandall
Paul H. Crandall University of California, Los Angeles
Robert H. Brook
Robert H. Brook RAND Corporation
Beate Ritz
Beate Ritz University of California, Los Angeles
Cyrus P. Zabetian
Cyrus P. Zabetian University of Washington
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Thomas J. Montine
Thomas J. Montine Stanford University
James B. Leverenz
James B. Leverenz Cleveland Clinic
Alberto J. Espay
Alberto J. Espay University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens many doors to allied careers—especially in counseling, psychology, and therapy. If you’re interested in roles that blend neuroscience with direct client work, exploring degrees in counseling or psychology is a smart move.

For those who value practical experience and accreditation, consider a cacrep online masters in counseling program. These programs offer academic rigor plus a pathway to licensure. For budget-minded students, exploring the most affordable online counseling degrees can be a cost-effective way to begin your career.

If your passion is supporting relationships and families, pursuing an lmft degree can lead to opportunities as a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist. Finally, for those targeting roles in research, therapy, or higher education, an affordable online masters in psychology can provide essential knowledge and credentials.

Each program offers online flexibility and clear routes into rewarding neuroscience-adjacent careers.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Rausch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles