World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Konstantine K. Zakzanis

Konstantine K. Zakzanis

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
14769
World Ranking
5567
National Ranking
377

Konstantine K. Zakzanis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Konstantine K. Zakzanis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Konstantine K. Zakzanis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Konstantine K. Zakzanis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Konstantine K. Zakzanis is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to fields intersecting medicine and psychology. Their research spans several subfields, notably epidemiology, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. The scope of their work centers around cognitive impairments, mental health conditions, and neuropsychological outcomes.

Zakzanis has published scholarly work focused on multiple topics, which include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate active contributions in neuropsychology, cognitive impairments, and mental health. Selected recent publications include:

  • "On the nature of objective and perceived cognitive impairments in depressive symptoms and real-world functioning in young adults," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "A review of the reliability of remote neuropsychological assessment," 2023, Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • "Long-term neurocognitive, psychological, and return to work outcomes in meningioma patients," 2022, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • "Cognitive reserve, cognition, and real-world functioning in MCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
  • "Sex differences in risk factors that predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia," 2022, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Zakzanis has frequently published in several venues, indicating a consistent engagement with specific academic audiences. The most frequent venues include:

  • Psychological Injury and Law
  • Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Neuro-Oncology Practice

Their collaborative efforts are evidenced by frequent co-authorship with several researchers, highlighting ongoing partnerships within their research community. Notable frequent co-authors are:

  • George Foussias
  • Angela Sekely
  • Sarah Saperia
  • Eliyas Jeffay
  • Sanghamithra Ramani

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive Deficit in Schizophrenia: A Quantitative Review of the Evidence

    R W Heinrichs;K K Zakzanis

  • On the nature and pattern of neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder.

    Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Larry Leach;Edith Kaplan

  • An fMRI study of the Trail Making Test

    Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Richard Mraz;Simon J. Graham;Simon J. Graham

  • Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers

    Konstantine K. Zakzanis

  • Neurocognitive Deficits in Cocaine Users: A Quantitative Review of the Evidence

    Diana Jovanovski;Suzanne Erb;Konstantine K Zakzanis

  • Facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder

    A. R. Daros;K. K. Zakzanis;A. C. Ruocco

  • Distinct Neurocognitive Profiles in Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes

    Konstantine K Zakzanis

  • Incentive motivation deficits in schizophrenia reflect effort computation impairments during cost-benefit decision-making

    Gagan Fervaha;Gagan Fervaha;Ariel Graff-Guerrero;Ariel Graff-Guerrero;Konstantine K. Zakzanis;George Foussias;George Foussias

  • Neuropsychological Differential Diagnosis

    Edith F. Kaplan;Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Larry Leach

  • Further parameters of insight and neuropsychological deficit in schizophrenia and other chronic mental disease.

    Donald A. Young;Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Carrie Bailey;Rafaela Davila

  • Amygdala and hippocampal volume reductions as candidate endophenotypes for borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies

    Anthony C. Ruocco;Anthony C. Ruocco;Sathya Amirthavasagam;Konstantine K. Zakzanis

  • Brief report: cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders: a quantitative review.

    Rachel C. Leung;Rachel C. Leung;Konstantine K. Zakzanis

  • Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA (“Ecstasy”) users: A longitudinal investigation

    Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Donald A. Young

  • The neuropsychological profile of vascular cognitive impairment not demented: A meta-analysis

    Brandon P. Vasquez;Konstantine K. Zakzanis

  • The effects of cannabis use on neurocognition in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis

    Rachel A. Rabin;Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Tony P. George;Tony P. George

  • A meta-analysis of structural and functional brain imaging in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: a neuroimaging profile.

    Konstantine K Zakzanis;Konstantine K Zakzanis;Simon J Graham;Simon J Graham;Zachariah Campbell

  • Automated cognitive testing methods and applications therefor

    Stanley Scott Knight;Konstantine Zakzanis

  • Dopamine D2 densities and the schizophrenic brain

    Konstantine K. Zakzanis;Kevin T. Hansen

  • Motivational deficits and cognitive test performance in schizophrenia.

    Gagan Fervaha;Gagan Fervaha;Konstantine K. Zakzanis;George Foussias;George Foussias;Ariel Graff-Guerrero;Ariel Graff-Guerrero

  • Prediction of longitudinal functional outcomes in schizophrenia: The impact of baseline motivational deficits

    G. Foussias;G. Foussias;S. Mann;S. Mann;K.K. Zakzanis;R. van Reekum

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary Remington
Gary Remington Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
George Foussias
George Foussias Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Aristotle N. Voineskos
Aristotle N. Voineskos Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Ariel Graff-Guerrero
Ariel Graff-Guerrero Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis University of California - San Diego School of Medicine
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Arun V. Ravindran
Arun V. Ravindran University of Toronto
Tony P. George
Tony P. George Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Steve Mann
Steve Mann University of Toronto
Paul J. Fletcher
Paul J. Fletcher Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open up a diverse range of career pathways, from counseling to research and organizational psychology. Many students choose online programs for their flexibility and nationwide options, making it easier to find a curriculum that matches their goals and location preference.

When considering the best programs, it’s helpful to look at rankings based on academic quality, resources, and career prospects. If you’re based in Texas, review the best psychology degree rankings in Austin for top local online or hybrid programs. For those in California, the best psychology degree rankings in California can help you spot high-quality institutions with robust online offerings.

The best psychology program rankings in Charleston and the best psychology degree programs ranking in Charlotte also provide valuable comparisons, especially for students interested in the Southeast. Researching these rankings will help you choose the right online degree and launch a successful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Konstantine K. Zakzanis

Trending Scientists