World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
17635
World Ranking
2585
National Ranking
1495

Arthur Wingfield publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur Wingfield sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Arthur Wingfield D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur Wingfield sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arthur Wingfield is affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to neuroscience and psychology, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology.

The scientist has contributed notably to research in hearing loss and rehabilitation, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, and speech and audio processing. Their work also covers topics in noise effects and management, hearing-related genetics including cochlea and tinnitus, reading and literacy development, and phonetics and phonology research.

Wingfield's recent publications include studies in various peer-reviewed journals. Notable papers include:

  • "Anticipatory Baseline Pupil Diameter Is Sensitive to Differences in Hearing Thresholds," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The Principle of Least Effort and Comprehension of Spoken Sentences by Younger and Older Adults," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Age-Related Differences in the Online Processing of Spoken Semantic Context and the Effect of Semantic Competition: Evidence From Eye Gaze," 2021, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • "Adults with cochlear implants can use prosody to determine the clausal structure of spoken sentences," 2021, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "Strategic Pauses Relieve Listeners from the Effort of Listening to Fast Speech: Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes in Narrative Recall by Adult Users of Cochlear Implants," 2023, Trends in Hearing

Wingfield frequently collaborates with a consistent group of researchers, including:

  • Ryan M. O'Leary
  • Mario A. Svirsky
  • Nicole Hope Capach
  • Nicole M. Amichetti
  • Jonathan D. Neukam

The primary venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Trends in Hearing
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Wingfield's publication record demonstrates a focus on understanding auditory processing, particularly in relation to aging populations and individuals with hearing impairments such as cochlear implant users. Their research crosses multidisciplinary domains, engaging with signal processing as well as experimental and cognitive psychology approaches.

Best Publications

  • Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Sophia E. Kramer;Mark A. Eckert;Brent Edwards

  • At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer's disease

    Mark W. Albers;Grover C. Gilmore;Jeffrey Kaye;Claire Murphy

  • Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech

    Sandra L McCoy;Patricia A Tun;L Clarke Cox;Marianne Colangelo

  • Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening.

    Patricia A. Tun;Sandra McCoy;Arthur Wingfield

  • Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood What It Is and How It Interacts With Cognitive Performance

    Arthur Wingfield;Patricia A. Tun;Sandra L. McCoy

  • Hearing Loss in Older Adults Affects Neural Systems Supporting Speech Comprehension

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;Murray Grossman;Arthur Wingfield

  • Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.

    Tepring Piquado;Derek Isaacowitz;Arthur Wingfield

  • Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging.

    Arthur Wingfield;Murray Grossman

  • Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

    Larry E. Humes;Judy R. Dubno;Sandra Gordon-Salant;Jennifer J. Lister

  • Response latencies for false memories: gist-based processes in normal aging.

    Patricia A. Tun;Arthur Wingfield;Merri J. Rosen;Lisa Blanchard

  • Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.

    Patricia A. Tun;Gail O'Kane;Arthur Wingfield

  • Speed of Processing in Normal Aging: Effects of Speech Rate, Linguistic Structure, and Processing Time

    Arthur Wingfield;Leonard W. Poon;Linda Lombardi;David Lowe

  • Does the capacity of working memory change with age

    Arthur Wingfield;Elizabeth A.L. Stine;Cindy J. Lahar;John S. Aberdeen

  • Neural Processing during Older Adults’ Comprehension of Spoken Sentences: Age Differences in Resource Allocation and Connectivity

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;Arthur Wingfield;Murray Grossman

  • Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity.

    Arthur Wingfield;Sandra L McCoy;Jonathan E Peelle;Patricia A Tun

  • The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Arthur Wingfield

  • Anomia : neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates

    Harold Goodglass;Arthur Wingfield

  • Cognitive Factors in Auditory Performance : Context, Speed of Processing, and Constraints of Memory

    Arthur Wingfield

  • Process and strategy in memory for speech among younger and older adults.

    Elizabeth L. Stine;Arthur Wingfield

  • Age dissociates recency and lag recency effects in free recall.

    Michael J. Kahana;Marc W. Howard;Franklin Zaromb;Arthur Wingfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia A. Tun
Patricia A. Tun Brandeis University
Harold Goodglass
Harold Goodglass Boston University
Jonathan E. Peelle
Jonathan E. Peelle Washington University in St. Louis
Michael J. Kahana
Michael J. Kahana University of Pennsylvania
Hiram Brownell
Hiram Brownell Boston College
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Debra Titone
Debra Titone McGill University
Marc W. Howard
Marc W. Howard Boston University
Robert Sekuler
Robert Sekuler Brandeis University
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in psychology, exploring online degrees in this field can open the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways. One prominent option is becoming a mental health counselor. The path to this profession typically involves earning a relevant degree, completing supervised clinical experience, and obtaining a state license.

Requirements may vary by location. For example, if you want to become a mental health counselor in Gilbert, you’ll need to follow specific educational and certification steps set by Arizona. Similarly, Glendale mental health counselor education requirements outline the necessary coursework and fieldwork needed for licensure in that city.

Other regions, such as North Carolina and Nevada, have their own standards. Prospective students should familiarize themselves with Greensboro mental health counselor education requirements and learn how to become a mental health counselor in Henderson to ensure they meet all local criteria. By choosing a pathway that matches your goals and region, you can confidently start your journey toward becoming a mental health professional.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur Wingfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles