World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8183
World Ranking
7825
National Ranking
75

Mary Rudner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Rudner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 293 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mary Rudner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Rudner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Rudner is affiliated with Linköping University in Sweden. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional subfields of study include sensory systems and human-computer interaction.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Language Development and Disorders

Mary Rudner has published extensively in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Cerebral Cortex, and Frontiers in Neuroscience. Their recent papers include the following:

  • Cognitive Hearing Science: Three Memory Systems, Two Approaches, and the Ease of Language Understanding Model (2021, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research)
  • Listening effort and fatigue in native and non-native primary school children (2021, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • Evidence of an Effect of Gaming Experience on Visuospatial Attention in Deaf but Not in Hearing Individuals (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Working Memory for Signs with Poor Visual Resolution: fMRI Evidence of Reorganization of Auditory Cortex in Deaf Signers (2020, Cerebral Cortex)
  • The Natural Language Environment of 9-Month-Old Infants in Sweden and Concurrent Association With Early Language Development (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, including Emil Holmer, Jerker Rönnberg, K. Jonas Brännström, Birgitta Sahlén, and Johanna Carlie. These collaborations have resulted in multiple publications across the key research areas.

Best Publications

  • Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)

    M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;Sophia E. Kramer;Mark A. Eckert;Brent Edwards

  • The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances

    Jerker Rönnberg;Thomas Lunner;Adriana Zekveld;Adriana Zekveld;Patrik Sörqvist

  • Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU)

    Jerker Rönnberg;Mary Rudner;Catharina Karlsson Foo;Thomas Lunner

  • When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise

    Jerker Rönnberg;Mary Rudner;Thomas Lunner;Adriana A Zekveld

  • Cognition and hearing aids.

    Thomas Lunner;Mary Rudner;Jerker Rönnberg

  • Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment.

    Mary Rudner;Jerker Rönnberg;Thomas Lunner

  • Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users

    Elaine Hoi Ning Ng;Mary Rudner;Thomas Lunner;Michael Syskind Pedersen

  • Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity.

    Catharina Foo;Mary Rudner;Jerker Rönnberg;Thomas Lunner

  • Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.

    Mary Rudner;Thomas Lunner;Thomas Behrens;Elisabet Sundewall Thorén

  • Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding.

    Jerker Rönnberg;Emil Holmer;Mary Rudner

  • Dissociating cognitive and sensory neural plasticity in human superior temporal cortex

    Velia Cardin;Velia Cardin;Eleni Orfanidou;Eleni Orfanidou;Jerker Rönnberg;Cheryl M. Capek

  • Hearing loss is negatively related to episodic and semantic long-term memory but not to short-term memory.

    Jerker Rönnberg;Henrik Danielsson;Mary Rudner;Stig Arlinger

  • Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.

    Mary Rudner;Catharina Foo;Jerker Rönnberg;Thomas Lunner

  • The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing.

    Mary Rudner;Jerker Rönnberg

  • The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.

    Adriana A. Zekveld;Mary Rudner;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Jerker Rönnberg

  • Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility

    Adriana A. Zekveld;Adriana A. Zekveld;Adriana A. Zekveld;Mary Rudner;Mary Rudner;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.

    Jerker Rönnberg;Thomas Lunner;Elaine Hoi Ning Ng;Björn Lidestam

  • The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.

    Adriana A. Zekveld;Mary Rudner;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Joost M. Festen

  • Neural correlates of working memory for sign language.

    Jerker Rönnberg;Mary Rudner;Martin Ingvar

  • Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the episodic buffer of working memory.

    Mary Rudner;Peter Fransson;Martin Ingvar;Lars Nyberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerker Rönnberg
Jerker Rönnberg Linköping University
Adriana A. Zekveld
Adriana A. Zekveld Amsterdam UMC
Mikael Heimann
Mikael Heimann Linköping University
Ingrid S. Johnsrude
Ingrid S. Johnsrude University of Western Ontario
Bencie Woll
Bencie Woll University College London
Peter Fransson
Peter Fransson Karolinska Institute
Björn Lyxell
Björn Lyxell Linköping University
Mikael Johansson
Mikael Johansson Royal Institute of Technology
Patrik Sörqvist
Patrik Sörqvist University of Gaevle
Martin Ingvar
Martin Ingvar Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a psychology degree, it’s worth considering related online degrees like social work. Social work and psychology often overlap in practice and career outcomes, offering diverse opportunities in counseling, healthcare, education, and community outreach.

Online programs have made it easier than ever to pursue quality education from anywhere in the country. For example, there are excellent best online social work degrees in Texas and specialized options like the best online social work degrees in Waco region.

Students seeking broader options can explore the best online social work degree programs in America, which offer flexible schedules and concentrations in various disciplines like mental health or child welfare. For those looking in the Southeast, the best social work programs in Alabama can be the ideal fit.

Graduates from these programs are well-prepared for careers as licensed social workers, mental health counselors, or community service managers. Advancing your education with an online degree can help you start or pivot a meaningful and rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Rudner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles