World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
10615
World Ranking
6355
National Ranking
3450

Jonathan E. Peelle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan E. Peelle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan E. Peelle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan E. Peelle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan E. Peelle is a researcher affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on several interconnected subfields and topics, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Speech and Hearing. Their research interest extends to areas such as Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Noise Effects and Management, and Multisensory Perception and Integration, highlighting multifaceted intersections between sensory processing, brain function, and communication.

Peelle has contributed extensively to the literature through research published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery

Their recent papers address topics ranging from speech intelligibility and listening effort to neuroimaging applications and cognitive demands of language processing. Notable publications include:

  • "Face mask type affects audiovisual speech intelligibility and subjective listening effort in young and older adults," 2021, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary," 2024, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Functional Neuroimaging as an Assessment Tool in Critically Ill Patients," 2022, Annals of Neurology
  • "Pupillometry reveals cognitive demands of lexical competition during spoken word recognition in young and older adults," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Cross-modal functional connectivity supports speech understanding in cochlear implant users," 2022, Cerebral Cortex

Collaboration forms an integral part of Peelle's research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Kristin J. Van Engen
  • Mitchell S. Sommers
  • Michael S. Jones
  • Aahana Bajracharya
  • Brent Spehar

Jonathan E. Peelle also has publications in book form, including a forthcoming title from Cambridge University Press: The Neuroscience of Language, scheduled for release in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Matthew H. Davis

  • Phase-Locked Responses to Speech in Human Auditory Cortex are Enhanced During Comprehension

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Joachim Gross;Matthew H. Davis

  • Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.

    Jonathan E. Peelle

  • Hearing Loss in Older Adults Affects Neural Systems Supporting Speech Comprehension

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;Murray Grossman;Arthur Wingfield

  • Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention

    Conor J Wild;Afiqah Yusuf;Daryl E Wilson;Jonathan E Peelle;Jonathan E Peelle

  • Predictive Top-Down Integration of Prior Knowledge during Speech Perception

    Ediz Sohoglu;Jonathan E. Peelle;Robert P. Carlyon;Matthew H. Davis

  • Converging Evidence for the Neuroanatomic Basis of Combinatorial Semantics in the Angular Gyrus

    Amy R. Price;Michael F. Bonner;Jonathan E. Peelle;Murray Grossman

  • Neural Processing during Older Adults’ Comprehension of Spoken Sentences: Age Differences in Resource Allocation and Connectivity

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;Arthur Wingfield;Murray Grossman

  • Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity.

    Arthur Wingfield;Sandra L McCoy;Jonathan E Peelle;Patricia A Tun

  • Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Mitchell S. Sommers

  • The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Arthur Wingfield

  • American Geriatrics Society and National Institute on Aging Bench-to-Bedside Conference: Sensory Impairment and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults.

    Heather E. Whitson;Heather E. Whitson;Alice Cronin-Golomb;Karen J. Cruickshanks;Grover C. Gilmore

  • Adjusting for global effects in voxel-based morphometry: Gray matter decline in normal aging

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Rhodri Cusack;Richard N.A. Henson

  • Heteromodal conceptual processing in the angular gyrus.

    Michael F. Bonner;Jonathan E. Peelle;Philip A. Cook;Murray Grossman

  • Listening effort and accented speech

    Kristin J. Van Engen;Jonathan E. Peelle

  • Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Ingrid S. Johnsrude;Matthew H. Davis

  • Speech Rate and Syntactic Complexity as Multiplicative Factors in Speech Comprehension by Young and Older Adults

    Arthur Wingfield;Jonathan E. Peelle;Murray Grossman

  • Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Arthur Wingfield

  • Automatic analysis (aa): efficient neuroimaging workflows and parallel processing using Matlab and XML

    Rhodri Cusack;Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky;Daniel J. Mitchell;Conor James Wild

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Arthur Wingfield
Arthur Wingfield Brandeis University
Matthew H. Davis
Matthew H. Davis University of Cambridge
Mitchell S. Sommers
Mitchell S. Sommers Washington University in St. Louis
Jean M. Vettel
Jean M. Vettel United States Army Research Laboratory
Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics
Bharat B. Biswal
Bharat B. Biswal New Jersey Institute of Technology
Corey T. McMillan
Corey T. McMillan University of Pennsylvania
Jean-Baptiste Poline
Jean-Baptiste Poline Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Felix Hoffstaedter
Felix Hoffstaedter Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology often leads students to explore a variety of related online degrees and professional pathways. Degrees in fields such as social work, counseling, and behavior analysis are both popular and valuable options for those interested in understanding human behavior and helping others.

For instance, those seeking a flexible entry point can research the most valuable online social work degrees in Texas, which prepare graduates for high-demand roles in advocacy, therapy, and case management. Another rewarding path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential with growing relevance in healthcare, education, and community programs.

Each state has its own requirements for BCBA certification. You can learn about Vermont bcba education requirements, as well as the bcba certification requirements in Virginia. Those interested in the Pacific Northwest can also review the Washington bcba requirements.

Exploring these pathways can help you align your educational choices with specific career outcomes, ensuring greater flexibility and success in the dynamic field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan E. Peelle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles