World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
91
Citations
47526
World Ranking
902
National Ranking
573

Neuroscience

D-Index
96
Citations
49612
World Ranking
844
National Ranking
455

David Poeppel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Poeppel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 361 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David Poeppel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Poeppel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David Poeppel is affiliated with the Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience.

Their scholarly work covers various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, and signal processing. Main research topics addressed include neuroscience and music perception, neural dynamics and brain function, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, multisensory perception and integration, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, reading and literacy development, as well as music and audio processing.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Speech rhythms and their neural foundations, 2020, Nature Reviews. Neuroscience
  • Crowdsourcing neuroscience: Inter-brain coupling during face-to-face interactions outside the laboratory, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Neural dynamics of phoneme sequences reveal position-invariant code for content and order, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Asymmetric sampling in human auditory cortex reveals spectral processing hierarchy, 2020, PLoS Biology
  • Categorical Rhythms Are Shared between Songbirds and Humans, 2020, Current Biology

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), PLoS Biology, Scientific Reports, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Collaborations are a significant part of their work, with regular coauthors including M. Florencia Assaneo, Pauline Larrouy-Maestri, Laura Gwilliams, Johanna M. Rimmele, and Joan Orpella.

David Poeppel was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2007.

Best Publications

  • The cortical organization of speech processing

    Gregory Hickok;David Poeppel

  • Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

    Gregory Hickok;David Poeppel

  • Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations.

    Anne Lise Giraud;David Poeppel

  • A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

    Ellen F. Lau;Colin Phillips;David Poeppel;David Poeppel

  • The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'

    David Poeppel

  • Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception

    Gregory Hickok;David Poeppel

  • Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias

    John W. Krakauer;Asif A. Ghazanfar;Alex Gomez-Marin;Malcolm A. MacIver

  • Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech

    Nai Ding;Lucia Melloni;Lucia Melloni;Lucia Melloni;Hang Zhang;Xing Tian

  • Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

    Huan Luo;David Poeppel

  • Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech

    Virginie van Wassenhove;Ken W. Grant;David Poeppel

  • Mechanisms Underlying Selective Neuronal Tracking of Attended Speech at a “Cocktail Party”

    Elana M. Zion Golumbic;Elana M. Zion Golumbic;Nai Ding;Stephan Bickel;Stephan Bickel;Peter Lakatos

  • The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German

    David Poeppel;Kenneth Wexler

  • Brain-to-Brain Synchrony Tracks Real-World Dynamic Group Interactions in the Classroom

    Suzanne Dikker;Suzanne Dikker;Lu Wan;Ido Davidesco;Lisa Kaggen

  • Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception.

    Virginie van Wassenhove;Ken W. Grant;David Poeppel

  • Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices

    Anthony Boemio;Stephen Fromm;Allen Braun;David Poeppel

  • Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing.

    Keith B. Doelling;Luc H. Arnal;Oded Ghitza;David Poeppel;David Poeppel

  • Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics

    David Poeppel;William J Idsardi;Virginie van Wassenhove

  • Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production.

    Anne Lise Giraud;Andreas Kleinschmidt;Andreas Kleinschmidt;David Poeppel;Torben E. Lund

  • Temporal modulations in speech and music.

    Nai Ding;Aniruddh D. Patel;Lin Chen;Henry Butler

  • Towards a new functional anatomy of language.

    David Poeppel;Gregory Hickok

  • Speech rhythms and their neural foundations

    David Poeppel;David Poeppel;M. Florencia Assaneo;M. Florencia Assaneo

Frequent Co-Authors

Alec Marantz
Alec Marantz New York University
Timothy P.L. Roberts
Timothy P.L. Roberts Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jonathan Z. Simon
Jonathan Z. Simon University of Maryland, College Park
Yasushi Miyashita
Yasushi Miyashita Juntendo University
Srikantan S. Nagarajan
Srikantan S. Nagarajan University of California, San Francisco
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Gregory Hickok
Gregory Hickok University of California, Irvine
Lucia Melloni
Lucia Melloni Max Planck Society
Colin Phillips
Colin Phillips University of Maryland, College Park
Anne-Lise Giraud
Anne-Lise Giraud University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Neuroscience but are also considering alternative or complementary career paths, there are several online graduate programs to explore. Many students connect their neuroscience background with fields like counseling, therapy, and psychology to broaden their career options.

For those interested in counseling, there are cacrep accredited programs online that can pave the way to professional licensure. Pursuing an affordable master's in counseling online allows flexibility while helping you build valuable skills for roles in mental health services.

Another pathway to consider is family therapy. Accredited mft programs offer specialized training for those interested in supporting couples and families.

Similarly, a psychology background can enhance your neuroscience expertise. The cheapest online master's degree in psychology is a practical route to strengthen your research and clinical skills. These related degrees can supplement your neuroscience studies, opening new career possibilities in healthcare, research, education, and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing David Poeppel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles