World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
91
Citations
24294
World Ranking
1086
National Ranking
564

Timothy P.L. Roberts publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy P.L. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 386 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Timothy P.L. Roberts D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy P.L. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade.

    Heidi C. Roberts;Timothy P. L. Roberts;Robert C. Brasch;William P. Dillon

  • MR Pulse Sequences: What Every Radiologist Wants to Know but Is Afraid to Ask

    Richard Bitar;General Leung;Richard Perng;Sameh Tadros

  • Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers

    Srikantan Nagarajan;Henry Mahncke;Talya Salz;Paula Tallal

  • Identification of "premyelination" by diffusion-weighted MRI.

    D M Wimberger;T P Roberts;A J Barkovich;L M Prayer

  • Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study

    Colin Phillips;Thomas Pellathy;Alec Marantz;Elron Yellin

  • Validating γ oscillations and delayed auditory responses as translational biomarkers of autism.

    Michael J. Gandal;J. Christopher Edgar;Richard S. Ehrlichman;Mili Mehta

  • Preoperative magnetic source imaging for brain tumor surgery: a quantitative comparison with intraoperative sensory and motor mapping.

    Hagen Schiffbauer;Mitchel S. Berger;Paul Ferrari;Dirk Freudenstein

  • Somatotopic organization of cortical fields in the lateral sulcus of Homo sapiens: evidence for SII and PV

    Elizabeth Disbrow;Tim Roberts;Leah Krubitzer

  • A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders

    Flore Zufferey;Elliott H. Sherr;Noam D. Beckmann;Ellen Hanson

  • Relating MEG Measured Motor Cortical Oscillations to resting γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) Concentration

    W. Gaetz;J.C. Edgar;D.J. Wang;T.P.L. Roberts

  • MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism.

    Timothy P.L. Roberts;Sarah Y. Khan;Mike Rey;Justin F. Monroe

  • GABA estimation in the brains of children on the autism spectrum: measurement precision and regional cortical variation

    William Gaetz;Luke Bloy;D. J. Wang;Russell G. Port

  • Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast-enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologic capillary density.

    C. F. Van Dijke;R. C. Brasch;T. P. L. Roberts;N. Weidner

  • Magnetic resonance imaging detects suppression of tumor vascular permeability after administration of antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor.

    Pham Cd;Roberts Tp;van Bruggen N;Melnyk O

  • Magnetoencephalography in partial epilepsy : Clinical yield and localization accuracy

    R. C. Knowlton;K. D. Laxer;M. J. Aminoff;T. P.L. Roberts

  • Multisection dynamic CT perfusion for acute cerebral ischemia: the "toggling-table" technique.

    Heidi C. Roberts;Timothy P. L. Roberts;Wade S. Smith;Theodore J. Lee

  • Diffusion MR imaging. Theory and applications.

    H A Rowley;P E Grant;T P Roberts

  • Resting-State Oscillatory Activity in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Lauren Cornew;Timothy P. L. Roberts;Lisa Blaskey;J. Christopher Edgar

  • Prevention of autoimmune demyelination in non-human primates by a cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor.

    Claude P. Genain;Tim Roberts;Richard L. Davis;My-Hoa Nguyen

  • Brain processing of capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia: a functional MRI study.

    Ralf Baron;Yvonne Baron;Elizabeth Disbrow;Timothy P. L. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Ward
Martin Ward Durham University
J. Christopher Edgar
J. Christopher Edgar Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Dominic J. Walton
Dominic J. Walton University of Hertfordshire
David Poeppel
David Poeppel New York University
Chris Done
Chris Done Durham University
Fiona A. Harrison
Fiona A. Harrison California Institute of Technology
Peter G. Jonker
Peter G. Jonker Netherlands Institute for Space Research
William Gaetz
William Gaetz Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Didier Barret
Didier Barret Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
A. C. Fabian
A. C. Fabian University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Neuroscience in the USA, there are several related online degrees that can expand your career options. For example, earning an accredited online psychology degree is a flexible and affordable way to gain foundational knowledge in brain science and behavior. This can open doors to various entry-level roles in mental health and research.

Another pathway is pursuing the easiest online msw program. A Master of Social Work provides advanced skills in counseling and support, preparing graduates for roles in clinical or community settings. Those interested in advanced practice may consider a psyd online program to become a licensed clinical psychologist.

For those drawn to relationship and family therapy, lmft online programs offer specialized training in marriage and family therapy. Each of these degrees provides pathways to rewarding careers connected to neuroscience, combining flexibility with accredited quality to fit your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy P.L. Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles