World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 9041 8354 149 145 121 4778

Santiago Canals publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Santiago Canals between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Santiago Canals published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 18 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2017. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
1999 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Santiago Canals: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 4
2004 1
2005 3
2006 1
2007 3
2008 10
2009 3
2010 6
2011 3
2012 1
2013 7
2014 4
2015 12
2016 5
2017 13
2018 11
2019 6
2020 12
2021 4
2022 6
2023 10
2024 9
2025 9
Total 149
Download as CSV

Santiago Canals publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago Canals sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 121
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Santiago Canals D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago Canals sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Santiago Canals is affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain. Their research is primarily focused within the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with specific expertise in several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Neural dynamics and brain function, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications.

Key recent publications by Santiago Canals include:

  • Mapping microglia and astrocyte activation in vivo using diffusion MRI, 2022, Science Advances
  • Different theta frameworks coexist in the rat hippocampus and are coordinated during memory-guided and novelty tasks, 2020, eLife
  • Chronic alcohol consumption alters extracellular space geometry and transmitter diffusion in the brain, 2020, Science Advances
  • KAT3-dependent acetylation of cell type-specific genes maintains neuronal identity in the adult mouse brain, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Increased network centrality of the anterior insula in early abstinence from alcohol, 2021, Addiction Biology

Frequent co-authors include Silvia De Santis, Wolfgang H. Sommer, David Moratal, Cláudio R. Mirasso, and Mohamed Kotb Selim, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts within related neuroscience and imaging research areas.

Santiago Canals' publications appear regularly in several venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Science Advances
  • Addiction Biology

This profile illustrates a consistent engagement with topics bridging advanced neuroimaging techniques, neural connectivity, and brain function, with an emphasis on translational and mechanistic studies within neuroscience and medicine.

Best Publications

  • Parkin gene inactivation alters behaviour and dopamine neurotransmission in the mouse

    Jean Michel Itier;Pablo Ibáñez;Maria Angeles Mena;Nacer Abbas

  • Erbb4 deletion from fast-spiking interneurons causes schizophrenia-like phenotypes

    Isabel del Pino;Cristina García-Frigola;Nathalie Dehorter;Jorge R. Brotons-Mas

  • Avoiding catastrophic failure in correlated networks of networks

    Saulo D. S. Reis;Saulo D. S. Reis;Yanqing Hu;Andrés Babino;José S. Andrade

  • Finding influential nodes for integration in brain networks using optimal percolation theory.

    Gino Del Ferraro;Andrea Moreno;Byungjoon Min;Byungjoon Min;Flaviano Morone

  • Functional MRI Evidence for LTP-Induced Neural Network Reorganization

    Santiago Canals;Michael Beyerlein;Hellmut Merkle;Nikos K. Logothetis;Nikos K. Logothetis

  • CBP is required for environmental enrichment-induced neurogenesis and cognitive enhancement.

    Jose P Lopez-Atalaya;Alessandro Ciccarelli;Alessandro Ciccarelli;Jose Viosca;Luis M Valor

  • Nitric oxide triggers the toxicity due to glutathione depletion in midbrain cultures through 12-lipoxygenase.

    Santiago Canals;Maria José Casarejos;Sonsoles de Bernardo;Eulalia Rodríguez-Martín

  • Longitudinal depolarization gradients along the somatodendritic axis of CA1 pyramidal cells: a novel feature of spreading depression.

    S. Canals;I. Makarova;L. López-Aguado;C. Largo

  • Role of extracellular signal‐regulated protein kinase in neuronal cell death induced by glutathione depletion in neuron/glia mesencephalic cultures

    S de Bernardo;S Canals;M J Casarejos;R M Solano

  • Widespread Vestibular Activation of the Rodent Cortex

    Ede A. Rancz;Javier Moya;Florian Drawitsch;Alan M. Brichta

  • Mapping microglia and astrocyte activation in vivo using diffusion MRI

    Unknown

  • Mapping of functional brain activity in freely behaving rats during voluntary running using manganese-enhanced MRI: Implication for longitudinal studies

    Oxana Eschenko;Santiago Canals;Irina Simanova;Michael Beyerlein

  • Smart Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agents that Sense Extracellular Calcium Fluctuations

    Goran Angelovski;Petra Fouskova;Ilgar Mamedov;Santiago Canals

  • The role of astroglia on the survival of dopamine neurons

    María Angeles Mena;Sonsoles de Bernardo;Maria José Casarejos;Santiago Canals

  • Functional MRI of long-term potentiation: imaging network plasticity.

    Efrén Álvarez-Salvado;Vicente Pallarés;Andrea Moreno;Santiago Canals

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of cortical connectivity in vivo.

    Santiago Canals;Michael Beyerlein;A. L. Keller;Yusuke Murayama

  • Glutathione depletion switches nitric oxide neurotrophic effects to cell death in midbrain cultures: implications for Parkinson's disease.

    S. Canals;M. J. Casarejos;S. De Bernardo;E. Rodríguez‐Martín

  • Electric stimulation fMRI of the perforant pathway to the rat hippocampus

    Santiago Canals;Michael Beyerlein;Yusuke Murayama;Nikos K. Logothetis;Nikos K. Logothetis

  • Selective and persistent activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase by nitric oxide in glial cells induces neuronal degeneration in glutathione-depleted midbrain cultures

    Santiago Canals;Maria José Casarejos;Sonsoles de Bernardo;Rosa Maria Solano

  • Different theta frameworks coexist in the rat hippocampus and are coordinated during memory-guided and novelty tasks.

    Víctor J López-Madrona;Elena Pérez-Montoyo;Efrén Álvarez-Salvado;David Moratal

  • Behavioral, electrophysiological and histopathological consequences of systemic manganese administration in MEMRI

    Oxana Eschenko;Santiago Canals;Irina Simanova;Nikos K. Logothetis;Nikos K. Logothetis

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis Chinese Academy of Sciences
Wolfgang H. Sommer
Wolfgang H. Sommer Heidelberg University
Claudio R. Mirasso
Claudio R. Mirasso University of the Balearic Islands
Oscar Herreras
Oscar Herreras Spanish National Research Council
Roberto Ciccocioppo
Roberto Ciccocioppo University of Camerino
Derik Hermann
Derik Hermann Heidelberg University
Sabine Vollstädt-Klein
Sabine Vollstädt-Klein Heidelberg University
Angel Barco
Angel Barco Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante
Falk Kiefer
Falk Kiefer Heidelberg University
Peter Kirsch
Peter Kirsch Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students with a background in neuroscience often explore diverse careers, including opportunities in counseling, psychology, and therapy. Pursuing online degrees can offer flexibility and affordability for those seeking to specialize in these areas without relocating or disrupting their current commitments.

For those interested in professional counseling, choosing a cacrep accredited program is essential. Such accreditation ensures rigorous academic standards and may be required for future licensure. Many students also seek information about the masters in counseling online cost to make informed financial decisions before enrolling.

If your interests include working with couples or families, exploring the cheapest online mft programs can reveal valuable, budget-friendly pathways into marriage and family therapy fields. Likewise, aspiring psychologists frequently compare the cheapest online master's degree in psychology to find programs that balance quality with affordability.

Exploring these related online programs helps neuroscience graduates and students expand their career options, meet licensure requirements, and find accessible, cost-effective routes into mental health and research professions.

Best Scientists Citing Santiago Canals

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles