World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
27351
World Ranking
1845
National Ranking
1088

Bertram Gawronski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertram Gawronski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 206 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bertram Gawronski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertram Gawronski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bertram Gawronski is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a notable focus on psychology and neuroscience. Gawronski's work includes 54 publications classified under social sciences, 49 under psychology, and 31 within neuroscience.

The scientist's research interests are concentrated in several key topics, including:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Subfields of their studies further highlight specialization in sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, information systems and management, and clinical psychology.

Frequent publication venues for Gawronski include:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (10 publications)
  • Social Cognition (5 publications)
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (5 publications)
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (2 publications)
  • Nature Reviews Psychology (2 publications)

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Gawronski are as follows:

  • "Twenty-Five Years of Research Using Implicit Measures," 2020, Social Cognition
  • "A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News," 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Common Academic Experiences No One Talks About: Repeated Rejection, Impostor Syndrome, and Burnout," 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Using the CNI Model to Investigate Individual Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments," 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Understanding Implicit Bias: Putting the Criticism into Perspective," 2020, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

Gawronski has collaborated extensively with a set of frequent co-authors, including Nyx L. Ng, Dillon M. Luke, Skylar M. Brannon, Alison Ledgerwood, and Paul W. Eastwick. These collaborations have contributed to the breadth and depth of research output in areas encompassing moral judgments, implicit measures, and social psychological phenomena.

Best Publications

  • Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

    Bertram Gawronski;Galen V. Bodenhausen

  • A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Bertram Gawronski;Tobias Gschwendner;Huy Le

  • Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach

    Paul Conway;Bertram Gawronski

  • Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition : The quad model of implicit task performance

    Frederica R. Conrey;Jeffrey W. Sherman;Bertram Gawronski;Kurt Hugenberg

  • And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Wolfgang Rauch;Bertram Gawronski

  • The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions

    Bertram Gawronski;Galen V. Bodenhausen

  • Handbook of implicit social cognition : measurement, theory,and applications

    Bertram Gawronski;B. Keith Payne

  • Are "implicit" attitudes unconscious?

    Bertram Gawronski;Wilhelm Hofmann;Christopher J. Wilbur

  • On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes

    Bertram Gawronski;Fritz Strack

  • Implicit measures in social and personality psychology

    Bertram Gawronski;Jan De Houwer

  • Dual-process theories of the social mind.

    Jeffrey W. Sherman;Bertram Gawronski;Yaacov Trope

  • baCk To The fUTUre of DissonanCe Theory: CogniTive ConsisTenCy as a Core moTive

    Bertram Gawronski

  • Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model

    Bertram Gawronski;Galen V. Bodenhausen

  • Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers.

    Silvia Galdi;Luciano Arcuri;Bertram Gawronski

  • What Do Implicit Measures Tell Us?: Scrutinizing the Validity of Three Common Assumptions:

    Bertram Gawronski;Etienne P. LeBel;Kurt R. Peters

  • Dual Process Theories

    Bertram Gawronski;Laura A. Creighton

  • I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations

    Bertram Gawronski;Galen V. Bodenhausen;Andrew P. Becker

  • When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation☆

    Bertram Gawronski;Roland Deutsch;Sawsan Mbirkou;Beate Seibt

  • Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not ☆

    Bertram Gawronski;Etienne P. LeBel

  • The Self-Regulation of Automatic Associations and Behavioral Impulses

    Jeffrey W. Sherman;Bertram Gawronski;Karen Gonsalkorale;Kurt Hugenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Galen V. Bodenhausen
Galen V. Bodenhausen Northwestern University
Roland Deutsch
Roland Deutsch TU Dresden
Fritz Strack
Fritz Strack University of Würzburg
Rainer Banse
Rainer Banse University of Bonn
Jeffrey W. Sherman
Jeffrey W. Sherman University of California, Davis
Victoria M. Esses
Victoria M. Esses University of Western Ontario
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua
Yaacov Trope
Yaacov Trope New York University
Robert J. Rydell
Robert J. Rydell Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology opens pathways to various allied health careers, including speech-language pathology, counseling, and educational psychology. With the increasing availability of online programs, it’s now more convenient than ever to pursue specialized study and licensure from anywhere in the USA.

If you’re interested in speech-language pathology, each state has its own licensure requirements. For example, those interested in practicing in Illinois can review the slp requirements in Illinois to understand educational prerequisites and clinical experience needed. Similarly, aspirants in Indiana should be aware of Indiana speech pathologist certification requirements before enrolling in an online program.

In other regions, you can explore state-specific regulations, such as the Iowa speech pathologist certification requirements or check out the slp requirements in Kansas. Understanding these requirements is crucial, as most states mandate a master’s degree, supervised clinical hours, and successful completion of a national examination.

Whether you’re planning to build a career in therapy, research, or education, exploring related online degrees and state requirements will help guide your professional journey after studying Psychology in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Bertram Gawronski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles