World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 49 1206 1109 35 32 423 11519

Dominique Thévenin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominique Thévenin between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominique Thévenin published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2017. 26 of the 505 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2017. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 43 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

505 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominique Thévenin: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 5
2000 4
2001 7
2002 8
2003 5
2004 7
2005 9
2006 12
2007 10
2008 10
2009 21
2010 20
2011 22
2012 21
2013 19
2014 23
2015 17
2016 20
2017 43
2018 24
2019 26
2020 30
2021 28
2022 23
2023 30
2024 20
2025 25
2026 1
Total 505
Download as CSV

Dominique Thévenin publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominique Thévenin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 417–426 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 423 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27 423
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Dominique Thévenin D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominique Thévenin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44 49
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Dominique Thévenin is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a primary focus on computational mechanics. Their research output includes over 310 publications, emphasizing advances in simulation and fluid dynamics within various engineering domains.

Thevenin's work spans several specialized subfields, notably computational mechanics, aerospace engineering, biomedical engineering, fluid flow and transfer processes, and mechanics of materials. The main topics they have explored involve complex simulation techniques and fluid dynamics phenomena such as:

  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
  • Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
  • Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics

Thevenin has been published regularly in a range of scientific venues with a strong presence in journals related to fluid mechanics, combustion, and chemical engineering. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Physics of Fluids
  • Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • Combustion and Flame

Thevenin's collaborative work includes several frequent coauthors, indicating sustained research partnerships. These coauthors are:

  • Cheng Chi
  • Gábor Janiga
  • Seyed Ali Hosseini
  • Michael Mansour
  • Stefan Hoerner

Among notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Thevenin are:

  • Direct numerical simulation of turbulent premixed ammonia and ammonia-hydrogen combustion under engine-relevant conditions, 2022, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Investigations on the effect of tip clearance gap and inducer on the transport of air-water two-phase flow by centrifugal pumps, 2020, Chemical Engineering Science
  • On-the-fly artificial neural network for chemical kinetics in direct numerical simulations of premixed combustion, 2021, Combustion and Flame
  • Investigations on the effect of rotational speed on the transport of air-water two-phase flows by centrifugal pumps, 2022, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
  • The Taylor-Green vortex as a benchmark for high-fidelity combustion simulations using low-Mach solvers, 2021, Computers & Fluids

Thevenin's research integrates computational modeling with experimental and theoretical fluid dynamics to address challenges in combustion processes, pump flows, and multiphase transport phenomena. The work is relevant to the development of engine technologies and fluid handling systems.

Best Publications

  • Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion

    Olivier Gicquel;Nasser Darabiha;Dominique Thévenin

  • Accurate Boundary Conditions for Multicomponent Reactive Flows

    M. Baum;T. Poinsot;D. Thévenin

  • Dynamics of flame/vortex interactions

    Paul-Henry Renard;D. Thevenin;Juan-Carlos Rolon;Sébastien Candel

  • Optimal blade shape of a modified Savonius turbine using an obstacle shielding the returning blade

    M.H. Mohamed;G. Janiga;E. Pap;D. Thévenin

  • Optimization of Savonius turbines using an obstacle shielding the returning blade

    M.H. Mohamed;G. Janiga;E. Pap;D. Thévenin

  • Modelling non-adiabatic partially premixed flames using flame-prolongation of ILDM

    Benoit Fiorina;Romain Baron;Olivier Gicquel;D. Thevenin

  • Multi-objective shape optimization of a heat exchanger using parallel genetic algorithms

    Renan Hilbert;Gábor Janiga;Romain Baron;Dominique Thévenin

  • Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Dominique Thévenin;Gábor Janiga

  • Impact of detailed chemistry and transport models on turbulent combustion simulations

    R. Hilbert;F. Tap;H. El-Rabii;D. Thévenin

  • Techniques for the reconstruction of a distribution from a finite number of its moments

    V. John;I. Angelov;A. A. Öncül;D. Thevenin

  • Autoignition of turbulent non-premixed flames investigated using direct numerical simulations

    Renan Hilbert;Dominique Thévenin

  • Comparative analysis of turbulence models for the aerodynamic simulation of H-Darrieus rotors

    László Daróczy;Gábor Janiga;Klaus Petrasch;Michael Webner

  • Multi-objective optimization of the airfoil shape of Wells turbine used for wave energy conversion

    M.H. Mohamed;G. Janiga;E. Pap;D. Thévenin

  • Calculation of the permeability in porous media using the lattice Boltzmann method

    Amir Eshghinejadfard;Amir Eshghinejadfard;László Daróczy;Gábor Janiga;Dominique Thévenin

  • A Review of Hemolysis Prediction Models for Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Hai Yu;Sebastian Engel;Gábor Janiga;Dominique Thévenin

  • Cerebral Blood Flow in a Healthy Circle of Willis and Two Intracranial Aneurysms: Computational Fluid Dynamics Versus Four-Dimensional Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Philipp Berg;Daniel Stucht;Gábor Janiga;Oliver Beuing

  • Towards direct numerical simulations of low-Mach number turbulent reacting and two-phase flows using immersed boundaries

    Abouelmagd Abdelsamie;Gordon Fru;Timo Oster;Felix Dietzsch

  • Optimal shape of thick blades for a hydraulic Savonius turbine

    Emeel Kerikous;Emeel Kerikous;Dominique Thévenin

  • Development of a parallel direct simulation code to investigate reactive flows

    D. Thévenin;F. Behrendt;U. Maas;B. Przywara

  • Direct numerical simulation of turbulent premixed ammonia and ammonia-hydrogen combustion under engine-relevant conditions

    Unknown

  • Investigations of heat release, extinction, and time evolution of the flame surface, for a nonpremixed flame interacting with a vortex

    Paul-Henri Renard;Juan Carlos Rolon;Dominique Thévenin;Sébastien Candel

Frequent Co-Authors

Udo Reichl
Udo Reichl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Nasser Darabiha
Nasser Darabiha University of Paris-Saclay
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern Max Planck Society
Kai Sundmacher
Kai Sundmacher Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
Bernhard Preim
Bernhard Preim Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Sébastien Candel
Sébastien Candel CentraleSupélec
Krishna D.P. Nigam
Krishna D.P. Nigam Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Volker John
Volker John Freie Universität Berlin
Kai H. Luo
Kai H. Luo University College London
Ulrich Maas
Ulrich Maas Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting career opportunities, students often explore complementary fields to diversify their skills and expand their job prospects. One such area is communication sciences, where programs like communication sciences and disorders programs provide insights into speech, language, and hearing sciences. These programs are increasingly available online, making them accessible to working professionals and distance learners.

Cost is a significant consideration when choosing an online degree. The guide on online speech pathology degree programs cost gives a clear picture of tuition fees and related expenses, helping students make informed decisions about budgeting for education in allied fields.

Veterans looking to transition into new careers can find valuable resources in veteran friendly online speech pathology degree programs, which offer tailored support and flexibility. These programs acknowledge veterans’ unique experiences and help them leverage their skills in healthcare settings.

For those seeking accelerated education paths, the list of best 5 year speech pathology programs showcases options that blend efficiency with quality training. Such programs allow students to enter the workforce sooner while gaining essential credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Dominique Thévenin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles