What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Organic chemistry
- Catalysis
- Thermodynamics
His primary areas of study are Chromatography, Adsorption, Analytical chemistry, Simulated moving bed and Enantiomer.
He works on Chromatography which deals in particular with Elution.
As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Adsorption, concentrating on Solvent and frequently concerns with Thermodynamics.
The concepts of his Analytical chemistry study are interwoven with issues in Membrane and Permeation.
He focuses mostly in the field of Simulated moving bed, narrowing it down to matters related to Scientific method and, in some cases, Chiral resolution and Column chromatography.
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern has included themes like Racemization, Mandelic acid, Crystallization and Aqueous solution in his Enantiomer study.
His most cited work include:
- Processes to separate enantiomers. (234 citations)
- Processes to separate enantiomers. (234 citations)
- Experimental determination of single solute and competitive adsorption isotherms. (232 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern mostly deals with Chromatography, Crystallization, Chemical engineering, Enantiomer and Organic chemistry.
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern interconnects Nonlinear system, Simulated moving bed, Adsorption and Analytical chemistry in the investigation of issues within Chromatography.
His Adsorption research incorporates elements of Phase and Thermodynamics.
His work deals with themes such as Scientific method, Crystallography and Solubility, which intersect with Crystallization.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Membrane reactor, Membrane and Dehydrogenation.
His Enantiomer research integrates issues from Mandelic acid and Phase diagram.
He most often published in these fields:
- Chromatography (59.19%)
- Crystallization (41.97%)
- Chemical engineering (27.36%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Crystallization (41.97%)
- Chemical engineering (27.36%)
- Chromatography (59.19%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Crystallization, Chemical engineering, Chromatography, Enantiomer and Catalysis.
His studies deal with areas such as Scientific method, Guaifenesin and Solubility as well as Crystallization.
The Chemical engineering study combines topics in areas such as Propane, Dehydrogenation and Propene.
His Chromatography research focuses on Racemization and how it connects with Enzyme.
Catalysis is a subfield of Organic chemistry that Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern tackles.
In general Organic chemistry, his work in Hydroformylation and Solvent system is often linked to Long chain linking many areas of study.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Kinetic modeling of methanol synthesis from renewable resources (28 citations)
- Kinetic modeling of methanol synthesis from renewable resources (28 citations)
- Literally Green Chemical Synthesis of Artemisinin from Plant Extracts. (27 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Organic chemistry
- Catalysis
- Thermodynamics
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern mainly investigates Chromatography, Crystallization, Catalysis, Nonlinear system and Thermodynamics.
His Chromatography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Laplace transform, Simulated moving bed, Adsorption and Finite volume method.
His study in Crystallization is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Scientific method, Enantiomer, Product and Solubility.
His Enantiomer study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Enantiopure drug and Analytical chemistry.
His Nonlinear system research includes elements of Frequency response, Adiabatic process, Mechanics and Applied mathematics.
His research integrates issues of Phase and Kinetic energy in his study of Thermodynamics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
