World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter H. Seeberger

Peter H. Seeberger

Award Badge
Chemistry
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 108 863 762 65 61 825 52627

Peter H. Seeberger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter H. Seeberger between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter H. Seeberger published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 31.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2017. 52 of the 996 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2017. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 30 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 35 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 35 publications 2008: 45 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 38 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 55 publications 2014: 53 publications 2015: 47 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 60 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 51 publications 2021: 52 publications 2022: 48 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 48 publications 2026: 4 publications
1995 2026

996 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter H. Seeberger: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 3
1997 5
1998 6
1999 5
2000 10
2001 17
2002 30
2003 22
2004 19
2005 35
2006 34
2007 35
2008 45
2009 31
2010 38
2011 36
2012 46
2013 55
2014 53
2015 47
2016 34
2017 60
2018 37
2019 34
2020 51
2021 52
2022 48
2023 24
2024 30
2025 48
2026 4
Total 996
Download as CSV

Peter H. Seeberger publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Seeberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 821–840 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 825 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32 825
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter H. Seeberger D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Seeberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68 108
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2002 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Peter H. Seeberger is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their research focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to chemistry as well. Within these fields, their work spans several subfields, including molecular biology, organic chemistry, materials chemistry, epidemiology, and biomedical engineering.

The primary scientific topics addressed in their publications include carbohydrate chemistry and synthesis, glycosylation and glycoproteins research, chemical synthesis and analysis, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, innovative microfluidic and catalytic techniques innovation, radical photochemical reactions, and pneumonia and respiratory infections.

Their recent papers reflect a broad engagement with chemical synthesis and its applications. Notable publications include:

  • Automated radial synthesis of organic molecules, 2020, Nature
  • How to approach flow chemistry, 2020, Chemical Society Reviews
  • Gut microbiota-specific IgA + B cells traffic to the CNS in active multiple sclerosis, 2020, Science Immunology
  • Total Synthesis of Polysaccharides by Automated Glycan Assembly, 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Discovery of Semi- and Fully-Synthetic Carbohydrate Vaccines Against Bacterial Infections Using a Medicinal Chemistry Approach, 2021, Chemical Reviews

Frequent collaborators include Martina Delbianco, Jian Yin, Jing Hu, Oren Moscovitz, and José Danglad-Flores, with collaboration counts ranging from 23 to 35 publications each.

Peter H. Seeberger's articles have appeared consistently in several scientific journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (22 publications)
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (19 publications)
  • Angewandte Chemie (18 publications)
  • Chemistry - A European Journal (13 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (12 publications)

In 2002, they were recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

Best Publications

  • Essentials of Glycobiology [Internet]

    Ajit Varki;Richard D Cummings;Jeffrey D Esko;Pamela Stanley

  • The Hitchhiker's Guide to Flow Chemistry

    Matthew B. Plutschack;Bartholomäus Pieber;Kerry Gilmore;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Automated Solid-Phase Synthesis of Oligosaccharides

    Obadiah J. Plante;Emma R. Palmacci;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Symbol Nomenclature for Graphical Representations of Glycans.

    Ajit Varki;Richard D. Cummings;Markus Aebi;Nicole H. Packer

  • Synthesis and medical applications of oligosaccharides

    Peter H. Seeberger;Daniel B. Werz;Daniel B. Werz

  • Solid-phase oligosaccharide synthesis and combinatorial carbohydrate libraries.

    Peter H. Seeberger;Wilm-Christian Haase

  • Synthetic GPI as a candidate anti-toxic vaccine in a model of malaria

    Louis Schofield;Michael C. Hewitt;Krystal Evans;Mary-Anne Siomos

  • Continuous-flow synthesis of the anti-malaria drug artemisinin.

    François Lévesque;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Detection of Bacteria with Carbohydrate-Functionalized Fluorescent Polymers

    Matthew D. Disney;Juan Zheng;Timothy M. Swager;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Microreactors as Tools for Synthetic Chemists—The Chemists' Round‐Bottomed Flask of the 21st Century?

    Karolin Geyer;Jeroen D. C. Codée;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Applying Flow Chemistry: Methods, Materials, and Multistep Synthesis

    D. T. McQuade;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Identification of carbohydrate anomers using ion mobility–mass spectrometry

    Johanna Hofmann;Johanna Hofmann;H. S. Hahm;P. H. Seeberger;P. H. Seeberger;Kevin Pagel;Kevin Pagel

  • The Use of Carbohydrate Microarrays to Study Carbohydrate-Cell Interactions and to Detect Pathogens

    Matthew D. Disney;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Automated oligosaccharide synthesizer

    William Christ;Lenz Krock;Obadiah J. Plante;Bastien Castagner

  • Surface Area Control and Photocatalytic Activity of Conjugated Microporous Poly(benzothiadiazole) Networks

    Kai Zhang;Daniel Kopetzki;Peter H. Seeberger;Markus Antonietti

  • Exploring the Structural Diversity of Mammalian Carbohydrates (“Glycospace”) by Statistical Databank Analysis

    Daniel B Werz;René Ranzinger;Stephan Herget;Alexander Adibekian

  • Oligosaccharide and glycoprotein microarrays as tools in HIV glycobiology; glycan-dependent gp120/protein interactions.

    Eddie W Adams;Daniel M Ratner;Heidi R Bokesch;James B McMahon

  • Probing Protein–Carbohydrate Interactions with Microarrays of Synthetic Oligosaccharides

    Daniel M. Ratner;Eddie W. Adams;Jing Su;Barry R. O'Keefe

  • Modular Synthesis of Heparin Oligosaccharides

    Hernán A. Orgueira;Alessandra Bartolozzi;Peter Schell;Remy E. J. N. Litjens;Remy E. J. N. Litjens

  • Tools for glycomics : mapping interactions of carbohydrates in biological systems

    Daniel M. Ratner;Eddie W. Adams;Matthew D. Disney;Matthew D. Disney;Peter H. Seeberger;Peter H. Seeberger

  • Microarrays of synthetic heparin oligosaccharides.

    Jose L. de Paz;Christian Noti;Peter H. Seeberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Pagel
Kevin Pagel Freie Universität Berlin
Daniel B. Werz
Daniel B. Werz Technische Universität Braunschweig
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern Max Planck Society
Matthew D. Disney
Matthew D. Disney Scripps Research Institute
Daniel Kolarich
Daniel Kolarich Griffith University
Martin Witzenrath
Martin Witzenrath Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Gerd Pluschke
Gerd Pluschke Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Gert von Helden
Gert von Helden Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society
Udo Reichl
Udo Reichl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Gerard Meijer
Gerard Meijer Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the intersection of chemistry and legal systems, pursuing a forensic psychology graduate programs online offers a unique avenue to apply scientific principles in criminal investigations.

Graduates with a background in chemistry can explore diverse forensic careers, where analytical skills are vital for evidence analysis and crime scene reconstruction. These roles often require specialized training and provide opportunities to work closely with law enforcement agencies.

For those considering foundational studies, the best online associates in criminal justice programs can be an accessible entry point that complements scientific expertise with knowledge of legal systems.

It’s important to understand the financial commitment involved, and reviewing information about criminal justice degree cost can help prospective students plan their education journey effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Peter H. Seeberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles