World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Arthur A. Stukas

Arthur A. Stukas

Arthur A. Stukas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arthur A. Stukas between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arthur A. Stukas published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1999. 5 of the 94 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1999. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1995 2025

94 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arthur A. Stukas: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 5
1999 10
2000 2
2001 2
2002 4
2003 1
2004 0
2005 5
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 1
2010 3
2011 3
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 5
2016 4
2017 3
2018 3
2019 2
2020 3
2021 7
2022 4
2023 4
2024 4
2025 1
Total 94
Download as CSV

Arthur A. Stukas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur A. Stukas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Arthur A. Stukas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur A. Stukas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Arthur A. Stukas is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia and has contributed to the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a particular focus on sociology, political science, gender studies, applied psychology, and ecological modeling. Their research spans a range of topics including the nonprofit sector and volunteering, behavioral health and interventions, species distribution and climate change, physical activity and health, human-animal interaction studies, obesity, physical activity and diet, as well as religion, spirituality, and psychology.

The recent publications by Arthur A. Stukas include:

  • Volunteerism and social capital: a functional approach (2023) published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Other works listed, though authored by different researchers, illustrate the range of research interests in the broader network related to social psychology and environmental health domains. These include titles on feedback seeking and depression, training detection dogs for conservation, fear of judgment and physical activity, and health promotion through sport.

Frequent collaborators in Arthur A. Stukas's research include:

  • Matthew Nicholson
  • Nicola McNeil
  • Paul O'Halloran
  • Erica Randle
  • N Rutter

Arthur A. Stukas has published in various academic venues, with contributions in journals such as:

  • Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
  • Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
  • International Review for the Sociology of Sport
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • BMC Public Health

The main research fields pursued revolve around social sciences with a substantial concentration in psychology across multiple studies. Stukas's interdisciplinary focus bridges social behavior, health-related interventions, ecological and environmental considerations, and societal issues related to volunteering and nonprofit activity.

Best Publications

  • Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers : a functional approach

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder;Robert D. Ridge;John Copeland

  • Volunteers' Motivations: Findings from a National Survey:

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder;Arthur A. Stukas

  • Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction.

    Mark Snyder;Arthur A. Stukas

  • The Effects of “Mandatory Volunteerism” on Intentions to Volunteer

    Arthur A. Stukas;Mark Snyder;E. Gil Clary

  • Motivations to Volunteer and Their Associations With Volunteers’ Well-Being

    Arthur A. Stukas;Russell Hoye;Matthew Nicholson;Kevin M. Brown

  • Social identity change: Shifts in social identity during adolescence

    Chris Tanti;Arthur A. Stukas;Michael J. Halloran;Margaret Foddy

  • The functional approach to volunteerism.

    Mark Snyder;E. Gil Clary;Arthur A. Stukas

  • The Matching of Motivations to Affordances in the Volunteer Environment An Index for Assessing the Impact of Multiple Matches on Volunteer Outcomes

    Arthur A. Stukas;Keilah A. Worth;E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder

  • Handbook of consumer psychology

    Mark Snyder;A. A. Stukas;E. G. Clary

  • Service learning : who benefits and why

    Arthur A. Stukas;E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder

  • PTSD in Heart Transplant Recipients and Their Primary Family Caregivers

    Arthur A. Stukas;Mary Amanda Dew;Galen E. Switzer;Andrea Dimartini

  • Understanding and encouraging volunteerism and community involvement.

    Arthur A. Stukas;Mark Snyder;E. Gil Clary

  • Narcissism and self-presentation : The moderating effects of accountability and contingencies of self-worth.

    David Russell. Collins;Arthur. Stukas

  • Student prejudice against gay male and lesbian lecturers.

    Vanessa Lynn Ewing;Arthur A. Stukas;Eugene P. Sheehan

  • Psychological symptom levels and their correlates in lung and heart-lung transplant recipients

    Carol S. Stilley;Mary Amanda Dew;Arthur A. Stukas;Galen E. Switzer

  • Tripartite Self-concept Change: Shifts in the Individual, Relational, and Collective Self in Adolescence

    Chris Tanti;Arthur A. Stukas;Michael J. Halloran;Margaret Foddy

  • Narcissism and the self-evaluation maintenance model: effects of social comparison threats on relationship closeness.

    Emma Nicholls;Arthur A. Stukas

  • Altruism and Helping Behavior

    A.A. Stukas;E.G. Clary

  • The Effects of "Mandatory Volunteerism" in Intentions To Volunteer.

    Arthur A. Stukas;Mark Snyder;E. Gil Clary

  • Volunteers' motivations: Findings from a national survey

    Mark Snyder;E. G. Clary;A. A. Stukas

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Snyder
Mark Snyder University of Minnesota
Mary Amanda Dew
Mary Amanda Dew University of Pittsburgh
Pauleen C. Bennett
Pauleen C. Bennett La Trobe University
Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
John Farhall
John Farhall La Trobe University
Michael W. Pratt
Michael W. Pratt University of California, San Diego
Yoshihisa Kashima
Yoshihisa Kashima University of Melbourne
Michael J. Platow
Michael J. Platow Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a flexible and accessible route for those passionate about understanding the human mind and helping others. Many respected institutions now offer programs designed for working professionals and busy students alike. Finding a program that matches your personal and career goals is key, with some students prioritizing flexibility, affordability, and streamlined coursework.

If you’re searching for accessible options on the West Coast, you can review the easiest online psychology master’s programs in California. Similarly, students in the Northeast may benefit from looking at the easiest online psychology master’s degrees in Pennsylvania. For those located between the coasts, there are many choices among the easiest online psychology degrees in the Midwest.

In Texas, aspiring psychologists in urban areas can review the easiest online psychology degrees in San Antonio. Regardless of location, graduates can pursue diverse career paths such as counseling, social services, or further doctoral studies. Online degrees can make advancing in psychology more attainable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur A. Stukas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles