World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
92
Citations
57277
World Ranking
863
National Ranking
548

Mark Snyder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Snyder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 281 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Snyder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Snyder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Donald T. Campbell Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology
  • 1980 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark Snyder is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences and psychology, with a primary focus on social and intergroup psychology, behavioral health and interventions, and the nonprofit sector and volunteering.

Snyder's scholarly contributions include publications in prominent venues such as MIS Quarterly Executive, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Environmental Psychology, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, and Cogent Psychology.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Appealing to motivation to change attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 702 experimental tests of the effects of motivational message matching on persuasion," 2022, Psychological Bulletin
  • "The 2021 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study," 2022, MIS Quarterly Executive
  • "The 2019 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study," 2020, MIS Quarterly Executive
  • "Political message matching and green behaviors: Strengths and boundary conditions for promoting high-impact behavioral change," 2021, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • "The Association between Medication Experiences and Beliefs and Low Medication Adherence in Patients with Chronic Disease from Two Different Societies: The USA and the Sultanate of Oman," 2021, Pharmacy

Their frequent co-authors include Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Alexandra Scharmer, Joshua Braverman, Alexander J. Rothman, and Leon A. Kappelman.

Snyder's work covers several main fields of study:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, their subfields include:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Management Information Systems
  • Social Psychology

The main research topics addressed in their work are:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Information Technology Governance and Strategy

Mark Snyder has been recognized with the Donald T. Campbell Award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in 2004 and was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1980.

Best Publications

  • Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.

    Mark Snyder

  • Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers : a functional approach

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder;Robert D. Ridge;John Copeland

  • Social Perception and Interpersonal Behavior: On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes

    Mark Snyder;Elizabeth Decker Tanke;Ellen Berscheid

  • Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring

    Mark Snyder

  • The Motivations to Volunteer Theoretical and Practical Considerations

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder

  • Self-monitoring processes

    Mark Snyder

  • On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity.

    Mark Snyder;Steve Gangestad

  • Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers.

    Allen M. Omoto;Mark Snyder

  • Hypothesis-Testing Processes in Social Interaction

    Mark Snyder;William B. Swann

  • Personality and social behavior

    Mark Snyder;W. Ickes

  • Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal.

    Steven W. Gangestad;Mark Snyder

  • The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships.

    Ellen Berscheid;Mark Snyder;Allen M. Omoto

  • Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising.

    Mark Snyder;Kenneth G. DeBono

  • Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality.

    Mark Snyder;William B Swann

  • When Belief Creates Reality

    Mark Snyder

  • Volunteers' Motivations: Findings from a National Survey:

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder;Arthur A. Stukas

  • A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior: The case of volunteerism.

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder

  • "To Carve Nature at Its Joints": On the Existence of Discrete Classes in Personality

    Steve Gangestad;Mark Snyder

  • Volunteers' motivations: A functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers

    E. Gil Clary;Mark Snyder;Robert Ridge

  • Considerations of Community The Context and Process of Volunteerism

    Allen M. Omoto;Mark Snyder

  • Handbook of consumer psychology

    Mark Snyder;A. A. Stukas;E. G. Clary

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur A. Stukas
Arthur A. Stukas La Trobe University
Michael Tsapatsis
Michael Tsapatsis Johns Hopkins University
Dionisios G. Vlachos
Dionisios G. Vlachos University of Delaware
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Ellen Berscheid
Ellen Berscheid University of Minnesota
Jeetain Mittal
Jeetain Mittal Lehigh University
Wei Fan
Wei Fan University of Massachusetts Amherst
Mark van Vugt
Mark van Vugt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Christopher J. Kiely
Christopher J. Kiely Lehigh University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and unique career paths. Many students choose to pair their psychology studies with social work programs, which greatly enhances their ability to support individuals and communities.

If you are interested in this interdisciplinary approach, consider learning more about the top social work programs in Idaho or the best social work degrees in Jackson. Both regions offer accredited programs with flexible online options that are ideal for psychology majors seeking broader skills.

Additionally, there are excellent opportunities in the South, such as the best social work degrees in Louisiana and top social work degrees in Memphis. These programs highlight practical coursework and field experience, preparing graduates for diverse roles, from counseling and therapy to case management and advocacy.

Online degrees in psychology and social work can lead to rewarding careers that make a real difference, and exploring different regions can help you find the right fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Snyder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles