World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
20817
World Ranking
2348
National Ranking
1366

William Ickes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Ickes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 200 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William Ickes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Ickes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Ickes is affiliated with The University of Texas at Arlington in the United States. Their research activities primarily focus on the field of psychology, with particular contributions in clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's scholarly work covers various interconnected topics, including:

  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance

William Ickes has contributed numerous articles across frequent publication venues, such as:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • International Journal of Psychology
  • Personal Relationships
  • Psychological Studies

Among recent publications associated either as author or co-author, some key papers include:

  • "The self-concepts of people with Dark Triad traits tend to be weaker, less clearly defined, and more state-related" (2021), Personality and Individual Differences
  • "How is Machiavellianism related to locus of control?: A meta-analytic review" (2021), Personality and Individual Differences
  • "The Dark Triad trait of psychopathy and message framing predict risky decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2021), International Journal of Psychology
  • "Dark Triad traits, recalled and current quality of the parent-child relationship: A non-western replication and extension" (2021), Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Self-concept clarity as a predictor of self-disclosure in romantic relationships" (2020), Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

William Ickes collaborates frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Maryam Tajmirriyahi
  • Lesley Verhofstadt
  • Céline Hinnekens
  • Laura Sels
  • Eva Ceulemans

Best Publications

  • New directions in attribution research

    John H. Harvey;William John Ickes;Robert F. Kidd

  • Personality and social behavior

    Mark Snyder;W. Ickes

  • Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions.

    Steve Duck

  • The Social Neuroscience of Empathy

    Jean Decety;William John Ickes

  • Naturalistic Social Cognition: Empathic Accuracy in Mixed-Sex Dyads

    William Ickes;Linda Stinson;Victor Bissonnette;Stella Garcia

  • Self‐Motivation and Adherence to Habitual Physical Activity

    Rod K. Dishman;William Ickes;William P. Morgan

  • Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?

    William Ickes;Paul R. Gesn;Tiffany Graham

  • Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers.

    Linda Stinson;William Ickes

  • Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables".

    Ronen Cuperman;William Ickes

  • When the Head Protects the Heart: Empathic Accuracy in Dating Relationships

    Jeffry A. Simpson;William Ickes;Tami Blackstone

  • Self-motivation and adherence to therapeutic exercise

    Rod K. Dishman;William Ickes

  • Loneliness: A Theoretical Review with Implications for Measurement

    Carol Marangoni;William Ickes

  • Correlates of Self-Consciousness

    Robert G. Turner;Michael F. Scheier;Charles S. Carver;William Ickes

  • The Role of Sex and Self-Monitoring in Unstructured Dyadic Interactions

    William Ickes;Richard D. Barnes

  • Personality influences on the choice of situations

    William Ickes;Mark Snyder;Stella Garcia

  • Automatic and controlled empathy

    S. Hodges;D. M. Wegner;W. J. Ickes

  • Compatible and incompatible relationships

    William John Ickes

  • Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior

    William John Ickes;Eric S. Knowles

  • When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: a test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions.

    Jeffry A. Simpson;M. Minda Oriña;William Ickes

  • Objective self awareness and self esteem

    William John Ickes;Robert A. Wicklund;C.Brian Ferris

  • New Directions in Attribution Research : Volume 1

    John H. Harvey;William Ickes;Robert F. Kidd

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Ann Buysse
Ann Buysse Ghent University
Sara D. Hodges
Sara D. Hodges University of Oregon
John H. Harvey
John H. Harvey University of Iowa
Judith A. Hall
Judith A. Hall Northeastern University
Jessi L. Smith
Jessi L. Smith University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Marianne Schmid Mast
Marianne Schmid Mast University of Lausanne
Ira H. Bernstein
Ira H. Bernstein The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Mark Snyder
Mark Snyder University of Minnesota
Steven W. Duck
Steven W. Duck University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees in the USA opens up a range of rewarding career opportunities. Many accredited programs are available nationwide, allowing students to specialize in fields such as mental health, school counseling, or marriage and family therapy. These paths offer flexibility for working professionals or those seeking to balance education with other commitments.

When considering where to study, it’s important to explore programs recognized for their educational excellence and licensure pathways. For instance, the top counseling degree programs in Maryland are well known for their robust training and support services. Likewise, many students are drawn to Michigan counseling degree programs for their diverse course offerings.

If you are looking outside the coasts, exploring the best counseling degree programs in the Midwest can provide access to respected faculty and practical internship opportunities. Minnesota is another standout state, with top-tier options such as the best counseling program rankings in Minnesota. Each of these programs prepares graduates for licensure and a meaningful career supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing William Ickes

Trending Scientists