World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
124
Citations
104091
World Ranking
208
National Ranking
131

James W. Pennebaker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Pennebaker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 353 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

James W. Pennebaker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Pennebaker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - APA Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

James W. Pennebaker is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans across multiple disciplines with a focus on psychology, social sciences, and computer science. Pennebaker's work frequently intersects with artificial intelligence, social psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the understanding of mental health through writing and digital mental health interventions. Other prominent research topics include misinformation and its impacts, sentiment analysis and opinion mining, mental health research topics broadly, topic modeling, and social and intergroup psychology.

Key recent papers by Pennebaker include:

  • Using large language models in psychology (2023), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis (2020), published in Science Advances
  • Understanding Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Social Media (2021), published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • The Psychology of Word Use in Depression Forums in English and in Spanish: Testing Two Text Analytic Approaches (2021), published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Values in Words: Using Language to Evaluate and Understand Personal Values (2021), published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ryan L. Boyd
  • Rada Mihalcea
  • Laura Biester
  • Ashwini Ashokkumar
  • Sarah Seraj

The scientist's work has been published regularly in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Science Advances

Awards received by Pennebaker include:

  • APA Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2016
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 2003

Best Publications

  • The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods

    Yla R. Tausczik;James W. Pennebaker

  • The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015

    James W. Pennebaker;Ryan L. Boyd;Kayla Jordan;Kate Blackburn

  • Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity.

    David Watson;James W. Pennebaker

  • Writing About Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process

    James W. Pennebaker

  • Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves.

    James W. Pennebaker;Matthias R. Mehl;Kate G. Niederhoffer

  • Confronting a Traumatic Event. Toward an Understanding of Inhibition and Disease

    James W. Pennebaker;Sandra Klihr Beall

  • Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.

    James W. Pennebaker;Laura A. King

  • Disclosure of Traumas and Immune Function: Health Implications for Psychotherapy.

    James W. Pennebaker;Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser;Ronald Glaser

  • Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative

    James W. Pennebaker;Janel D. Seagal

  • The psychology of physical symptoms

    James W. Pennebaker

  • Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles

    Matthew L. Newman;James W. Pennebaker;Diane S. Berry;Jane M. Richards

  • Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications

    James W. Pennebaker

  • Opening up : the healing power of expressing emotions

    James W. Pennebaker

  • Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?

    Jennifer K. Bosson;William B. Swann Jr.;James W. Pennebaker

  • Cognitive, Emotional, and Language Processes in Disclosure

    James W. Pennebaker;Martha E. Francis

  • Confession, Inhibition, and Disease

    James W. Pennebaker

  • Accelerating the coping process.

    James W. Pennebaker;Michelle Colder;Lisa K. Sharp

  • Linguistic Predictors of Adaptive Bereavement

    James W. Pennebaker;Tracy J. Mayne;Martha E. Francis

  • The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007

    James W Pennebaker;Cindy K Chung;Molly Ireland;Amy Gonzales

  • Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups.

    Kathryn P. Davison;James W. Pennebaker;Sally S. Dickerson

  • Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): Pronounced “Luke,” . . . and Other Useful Facts

    Cindy K. Chung;James W. Pennebaker

  • Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007)

    JW Pennebaker;Roger Booth;ME Francis

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias R. Mehl
Matthias R. Mehl University of Arizona
Keith J. Petrie
Keith J. Petrie University of Auckland
Richard B. Slatcher
Richard B. Slatcher University of Georgia
Bernard Rimé
Bernard Rimé Université Catholique de Louvain
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Samuel D. Gosling
Samuel D. Gosling The University of Texas at Austin
M. Brent Donnellan
M. Brent Donnellan Michigan State University
Daniel M. Wegner
Daniel M. Wegner Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and open doors to a wide range of career pathways in the U.S. The counseling psychology career outlook remains positive, with steady demand in schools, hospitals, and private practice settings. Understanding the distinctions between roles is important as well—for instance, therapist vs psychologist salary varies significantly, often depending on education level, specialization, and work setting.

The fastest growth is currently seen in some specialized fields. If you’re considering which path to follow, learn about what type of psychologist is most in demand to align your studies with market needs. For those interested in the intersection of psychology and law, the demand for forensic psychologists is on the rise in both clinical and criminal justice settings.

Whether you aim to become a licensed psychologist, counselor, therapist, or specialize in forensic work, online psychology programs provide the foundational knowledge and training needed for a rewarding, in-demand career.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Pennebaker

Trending Scientists