World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
21478
World Ranking
1627
National Ranking
30

David P. Wolfer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Wolfer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 222 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David P. Wolfer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Wolfer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Wolfer is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to subfields including Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's main research topics focus on Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, memory and neural mechanisms, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, animal behavior and welfare studies, and adipose tissue and metabolism.

David P. Wolfer has published multiple recent papers, including:

  • Premature aging in mice with error-prone protein synthesis, 2022, Science Advances
  • Loss of all three APP family members during development impairs synaptic function and plasticity, disrupts learning, and causes an autism-like phenotype, 2021, The EMBO Journal
  • Role of Environment and Experimenter in Reproducibility of Behavioral Studies With Laboratory Mice, 2022, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Error-prone protein synthesis recapitulates early symptoms of Alzheimer disease in aging mice, 2022, Cell Reports
  • The rearing environment persistently modulates mouse phenotypes from the molecular to the behavioural level, 2022, PLoS Biology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Irmgard Amrein (15 collaborations)
  • Martina Nigri (8 collaborations)
  • Erik C. Böttger (6 collaborations)
  • Rashid Akbergenov (5 collaborations)
  • Kader Thiam (5 collaborations)

David P. Wolfer commonly publishes in the following venues:

  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (5 papers)
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature (4 papers)
  • Frontiers in Neuroanatomy (3 papers)
  • Cell Reports (2 papers)
  • PNAS Nexus (2 papers)

Best Publications

  • Arc/Arg3.1 Is Essential for the Consolidation of Synaptic Plasticity and Memories

    Niels Plath;Ora Ohana;Ora Ohana;Björn Dammermann;Mick L. Errington

  • Essential Role for TrkB Receptors in Hippocampus-Mediated Learning

    Liliana Minichiello;Martin Korte;David Wolfer;Ralf Kühn

  • GlyR alpha3: an essential target for spinal PGE2-mediated inflammatory pain sensitization.

    Robert J. Harvey;Ulrike B. Depner;Heinz Wässle;Seifollah Ahmadi

  • Mice with Combined Gene Knock-Outs Reveal Essential and Partially Redundant Functions of Amyloid Precursor Protein Family Members

    Sabine Heber;Jochen Herms;Vladan Gajic;Johannes Hainfellner

  • The AP-1 Transcription Factor c-Jun Is Required for Efficient Axonal Regeneration

    Gennadij Raivich;Marion Bohatschek;Clive Da Costa;Osuke Iwata

  • Knockout of ERK1 MAP kinase enhances synaptic plasticity in the striatum and facilitates striatal-mediated learning and memory

    Cristina Mazzucchelli;Chiara Vantaggiato;Alessandro Ciamei;Stefania Fasano

  • A role for the Ras signalling pathway in synaptic transmission and long-term memory

    Riccardo Brambilla;Nerina Gnesutta;Liliana Minichiello;Gail White

  • The Secreted -Amyloid Precursor Protein Ectodomain APPs Is Sufficient to Rescue the Anatomical, Behavioral, and Electrophysiological Abnormalities of APP-Deficient Mice

    Sabine Ring;Sascha W. Weyer;Susanne B. Kilian;Elaine Waldron

  • Mice lacking the gene encoding tissue-type plasminogen activator show a selective interference with late-phase long-term potentiation in both Schaffer collateral and mossy fiber pathways

    Yan-You Huang;Mary Elizabeth Bach;Hans-Peter Lipp;Min Zhuo

  • Cerebellar ataxia and Purkinje cell dysfunction caused by Ca2+-activated K+ channel deficiency

    M. Sausbier;H. Hu;C. Arntz;S. Feil

  • Mutant mice and neuroscience: Recommendations concerning genetic background

    Alcino J. Silva;Elizabeth M. Simpson;Joseph S. Takahashi;Hans Peter Lipp

  • BEHAVIORAL AND ANATOMICAL DEFICITS IN MICE HOMOZYGOUS FOR A MODIFIED BETA -AMYLOID PRECURSOR PROTEIN GENE

    Ulrike Müller;Nadine Cristina;Zhi-Wei Li;David P. Wolfer

  • Kinase-Independent Requirement of EphB2 Receptors in Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity

    Ilona C. Grunwald;Martin Korte;David Wolfer;George A. Wilkinson

  • Knockout mice: simple solutions to the problems of genetic background and flanking genes

    David P Wolfer;Wim E Crusio;Hans Peter Lipp

  • Loss of the limbic mineralocorticoid receptor impairs behavioral plasticity

    Stefan Berger;David P. Wolfer;Oliver Selbach;Heike Alter

  • Does cAMP response element-binding protein have a pivotal role in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and hippocampus-dependent memory?

    Detlef Balschun;David P. Wolfer;Peter Gass;Theo Mantamadiotis

  • Lack of parvalbumin in mice leads to behavioral deficits relevant to all human autism core symptoms and related neural morphofunctional abnormalities.

    M. Wöhr;D. Orduz;Patrick Gregory;H Moreno

  • Genetically modified mice and cognition.

    Hans-Peter Lipp;David P Wolfer

  • Deficits in Memory Tasks of Mice with CREB Mutations Depend on Gene Dosage

    Peter Gass;David P. Wolfer;Detlef Balschun;Dorothea Rudolph

  • Laboratory animal welfare: cage enrichment and mouse behaviour

    David P. Wolfer;Oxana Litvin;Samuel Morf;Roger M. Nitsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Peter Lipp
Hans-Peter Lipp University of Zurich
Ulrike Müller
Ulrike Müller Heidelberg University
Giacomo Dell'Omo
Giacomo Dell'Omo Ornis Italica
Martin Korte
Martin Korte Technische Universität Braunschweig
Igor Branchi
Igor Branchi Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Roger M. Nitsch
Roger M. Nitsch University of Zurich
Peter Sonderegger
Peter Sonderegger University of Zurich
Günther Schütz
Günther Schütz German Cancer Research Center
Adriano Aguzzi
Adriano Aguzzi University of Zurich
Francesca Cirulli
Francesca Cirulli Istituto Superiore di Sanità

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David P. Wolfer

Trending Scientists