World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
19240
World Ranking
17725
National Ranking
8848

Ceib Phillips publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ceib Phillips sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ceib Phillips D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ceib Phillips sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ceib Phillips is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Surgery, Oral Surgery, Genetics, Orthodontics, and General Health Professions.

Their work encompasses several specialized topics including:

  • Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

Ceib Phillips has published extensively, with a notable presence in venues such as UNC Libraries and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Other publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), the European Journal of Orthodontics, and FACE.

Some recent publications include:

  • Orthognathic speech pathology: impacts of Class III malocclusion on speech, 2021, European Journal of Orthodontics
  • Modified Carnoy's Compared to Carnoy's Solution Is Equally Effective in Preventing Recurrence of Odontogenic Keratocysts, 2021, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Impacts of Skeletal Anterior Open Bite Malocclusion on Speech, 2022, FACE
  • Fresh view of the hot brown dwarf HD 984 B through high-resolution spectroscopy, 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Retrospective Study of Prenatal and Postnatal Gaps in Oral Health Care Utilization: Medicaid Policy Implications, 2022, Maternal and Child Health Journal

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Timothy A. Turvey
  • George H. Blakey
  • Raymond P. White
  • Carroll Ann Trotman
  • Raymond E. White

Best Publications

  • The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension.

    William R Proffit;Timothy A Turvey;Ceib Phillips

  • Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability.

    W R Proffit;T A Turvey;C Phillips

  • Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients.

    Lucia H.S. Cevidanes;L. J. Bailey;G. R. Tucker;M. A. Styner

  • Bacterial reduction with nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation

    B. Clark Dalton;Dag Ørstavik;Ceib Phillips;Mary Pettiette

  • Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial.

    J.F.Camilla Tulloch;Ceib Phillips;William R. Proffit

  • The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.

    J.F. Camilla Tulloch;Ceib Phillips;Gary Koch;William R. Proffit

  • Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment.

    J.F.Camilla Tulloch;William R Proffit;Ceib Phillips

  • Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice

    James Kaley;Ceib Phillips

  • Facial pattern differences in long-faced children and adults.

    Henry W. Fields;William R. Proffit;W.L. Nixon;Ceib Phillips

  • Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography

    Ana Emilia F. de Oliveira;Lucia Helena S. Cevidanes;Ceib Phillips;Alexandre Motta

  • Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery

    Lucia H.S. Cevidanes;L’Tanya J. Bailey;Scott F. Tucker;Martin A. Styner

  • Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts

    Marco Antonio Almeida;Ceib Phillips;Katherine Kula;Camilla Tulloch

  • The psychosocial impact of developmental dental defects in people with hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta

    Kristina D. Coffield;Ceib Phillips;Melissa Brady;Michael W. Roberts

  • Long-term stability of surgical open-bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy.

    William R. Proffit;L'Tanya J. Bailey;Ceib Phillips;Timothy A. Turvey

  • Quantification of condylar resorption in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.

    L.H.S. Cevidanes;A.-K. Hajati;B. Paniagua;P.F. Lim

  • Experimental manipulation of head posture

    Peter S. Vig;Kevin J. Showfety;Ceib Phillips

  • Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion

    J. F. Tulloch;William R Proffit;Ceib L Phillips

  • Risk factors for developing tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation associated with nightguard vital bleaching.

    Ralph H. Leonard;Van B. Haywood;Ceib Phillips

  • A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in adults

    William R. Proffit;Celb Phillips;Neofitis Douvartzidis

  • Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery.

    Ceib Phillips;Raymond P White;Daniel A Shugars;Xiaolei Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Proffit
William R. Proffit University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Steven Offenbacher
Steven Offenbacher University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael S. Roberts
Michael S. Roberts University of Queensland
Martin Styner
Martin Styner University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Martin Trope
Martin Trope University of Pennsylvania
Gary D. Slade
Gary D. Slade University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Philip C. Trackman
Philip C. Trackman Boston University
Kenneth M. Hargreaves
Kenneth M. Hargreaves The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Thomas C. Hart
Thomas C. Hart National Institutes of Health
Edward J. Swift
Edward J. Swift University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The healthcare industry offers a diverse range of career paths beyond becoming a physician. For those seeking flexibility, several online degree options can help you advance or change your medical career while accommodating your schedule. Advanced nursing professionals can consider msn to dnp programs online to gain leadership skills and expand clinical expertise without attending traditional, on-campus classes.

Pharmacists are increasingly pursuing a pharmacy degree online to meet job requirements and enter a high-demand sector. Additionally, managing patient health records and information is critical in modern medicine. Those interested in this field can boost their qualifications with rhia certification programs online.

For an administrative route, affordable medical billing and coding programs provide a pathway to enter medical billing, coding, and health data management. These online degree and certification options can open doors to rewarding roles in healthcare, even for those who wish to avoid the lengthy demands of traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Ceib Phillips

Trending Scientists