World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles A. Sanislow

Charles A. Sanislow

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 79 1491 1333 893 778 142 29996

Charles A. Sanislow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles A. Sanislow between 1961 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles A. Sanislow published across 65 years, from 1961 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2004. 1 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2004. 1961: 2 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 2 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1961 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles A. Sanislow: publications per year, 1961 to 2025
Year Publications
1961 2
1962 0
1963 2
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 4
2002 7
2003 12
2004 14
2005 10
2006 6
2007 9
2008 5
2009 13
2010 7
2011 8
2012 7
2013 3
2014 4
2015 4
2016 2
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 4
2021 1
2022 2
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 150
Download as CSV

Charles A. Sanislow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles A. Sanislow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 142
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles A. Sanislow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles A. Sanislow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 79
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charles A. Sanislow is affiliated with Wesleyan University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with significant contributions in clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, philosophy, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

Sanislow has published in multiple peer-reviewed venues, including:

  • BMC Medicine
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • World Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Charles A. Sanislow include:

  • "Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC" (2022, BMC Medicine)
  • "Association of Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria With Suicide Attempts" (2020, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • "RDoC at 10: changing the discourse for psychopathology" (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • "Development and environment in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria" (2022, Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science)
  • "Brief report on the relationship between temporal discount rate and error related negativity for immediate versus future choice options" (2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology)

Their frequent collaborators include Sarah E. Morris, Bruce N. Cuthbert, Anna Darre Hector, Jenni Pacheco, and Uma Vaidyanathan.

Best Publications

  • Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders

    Thomas R Insel;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Marjorie A. Garvey;Robert K. Heinssen

  • The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.

    Mary C. Zanarini;Andrew E. Skodol;Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan

  • Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders

    Donna S. Bender;Regina T. Dolan;Andrew E. Skodol;Charles A. Sanislow

  • Ten-Year Course of Borderline Personality Disorder: Psychopathology and Function From the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    John G Gunderson;Robert L. Stout;Thomas H. McGlashan;M. Tracie Shea;M. Tracie Shea

  • Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria.

    Charles A. Sanislow;Daniel S. Pine;Kevin J. Quinn;Michael J. Kozak

  • Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;Thomas H. McGlashan;Ingrid R. Dyck

  • Amygdala hyperreactivity in borderline personality disorder: implications for emotional dysregulation.

    Nelson H Donegan;Charles A Sanislow;Hilary P Blumberg;Robert K Fulbright

  • The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study (CLPS): Overview and implications

    Andrew E. Skodol;John G. Gunderson;M. Tracie Shea;Thomas H. McGlashan

  • Childhood maltreatment associated with adult personality disorders: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study

    Cynthia L. Battle;M. Tracie Shea;Dawn M. Johnson;Shirley Yen

  • Two-Year Prevalence and Stability of Individual DSM-IV Criteria for Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders: Toward a Hybrid Model of Axis II Disorders

    Thomas H. McGlashan;Carlos M. Grilo;Charles A. Sanislow;Elizabeth Ralevski

  • Characteristics of effective therapists: further analyses of data from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

    Sidney J. Blatt;Charles A. Sanislow;David C. Zuroff;Paul A. Pilkonis

  • Personality Assessment in DSM--5: Empirical support for rating Severity, Style, and Traits

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Johanna C. Malone;Emily B. Ansell;Charles A. Sanislow

  • Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder over two years

    Andrew E. Skodol;Maria E. Pagano;Donna S. Bender;M. Tracie Shea

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study.

    Charles A. Sanislow;Carlos M. Grilo;Leslie C. Morey;Donna S. Bender

  • Gender differences in borderline personality disorder: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study.

    Dawn M Johnson;M.Tracie Shea;Shirley Yen;Cynthia L Battle

  • Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria Associated With Prospectively Observed Suicidal Behavior

    Shirley Yen;M. Tracie Shea;Charles A. Sanislow;Carlos M. Grilo

  • Traumatic exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in borderline, schizotypal, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study.

    Shirley Yen;M Tracie Shea;Cynthia L Battle;Dawn M Johnson

  • Two-Year Stability and Change of Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders

    Carlos M. Grilo;Charles A. Sanislow;John G. Gunderson;Maria E. Pagano

  • RELATION OF THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE AND PERFECTIONISM TO OUTCOME IN BRIEF OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION

    David C. Zuroff;Sidney J. Blatt;Stuart M. Sotsky;Janice L. Krupnick

  • Axis I and axis II disorders as predictors of prospective suicide attempts: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study.

    Shirley Yen;M. Tracie Shea;Maria Pagano;Charles A. Sanislow

  • Dimensional Representations of DSM-IV Personality Disorders: Relationships to Functional Impairment

    Andrew E. Skodol;John M. Oldham;Donna S. Bender;Ingrid R. Dyck

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos M. Grilo
Carlos M. Grilo Yale University
Thomas H. McGlashan
Thomas H. McGlashan Yale University
John G. Gunderson
John G. Gunderson Harvard University
M. Tracie Shea
M. Tracie Shea Brown University
Mary C. Zanarini
Mary C. Zanarini Harvard University
Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Shirley Yen
Shirley Yen Harvard Medical School
Andrew E. Skodol
Andrew E. Skodol University of Arizona
John C. Markowitz
John C. Markowitz Columbia University
Donna S. Bender
Donna S. Bender Tulane University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology offers many pathways, especially as online degrees become increasingly popular. Pursuing an online psychology degree can prepare you for roles in counseling, therapy, research, or clinical practice. However, it’s important to understand that becoming a licensed therapist typically requires more than just academic coursework.

Each location in the United States has its own requirements for licensure. For example, those interested in practicing in Arizona should review the licensed therapist requirements in Scottsdale. If you’re considering a career in the Pacific Northwest, you’ll want to check the licensed therapist requirements in Seattle and the licensed therapist requirements in Spokane. Those aiming to practice in the Midwest should be aware of the steps required for becoming a licensed therapist in St. Louis.

No matter where you plan to work, most states require advanced degrees, supervised clinical hours, and successful completion of a state-approved exam. Research your state’s licensing process early to ensure a smooth career transition after finishing your studies.

Best Scientists Citing Charles A. Sanislow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles