World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1613 1445 960 840 283 38612

Kim L. Gratz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kim L. Gratz between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kim L. Gratz published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2015. 12 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2015. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
2001 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kim L. Gratz: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 1
2006 8
2007 4
2008 9
2009 8
2010 14
2011 16
2012 23
2013 18
2014 24
2015 25
2016 14
2017 17
2018 16
2019 13
2020 20
2021 17
2022 24
2023 5
2024 8
2025 4
Total 295
Download as CSV

Kim L. Gratz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim L. Gratz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 283 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 283
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kim L. Gratz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim L. Gratz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kim L. Gratz is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a significant focus on clinical psychology. They have contributed extensively to studies in psychiatry and mental health, as well as social, applied, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, with a strong emphasis on suicide and self-harm studies. Other key areas include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, personality disorders and psychopathology, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, COVID-19 and mental health, mental health research topics, and mental health treatment and access.

Among their most cited recent papers are:

  • "Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Life," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness explain the associations of COVID-19 social and economic consequences to suicide risk," 2020, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • "The prospective influence of COVID-19 affective risk assessments and intolerance of uncertainty on later dimensions of health anxiety," 2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • "Emotion dysregulation across levels of substance use," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Pseudoscientific Beliefs, Trust, Political Party Affiliation, and Risk Perceptions," 2021, Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Kim L. Gratz has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting a network of recurring partnerships. These include:

  • Matthew T. Tull
  • Julia R. Richmond
  • Keith A. Edmonds
  • Jason P. Rose
  • Adam J. Mann

The scientist regularly publishes in specific academic venues. The most frequent platforms for their work are:

  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Best Publications

  • Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

    Kim L. Gratz;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model.

    Alexander L. Chapman;Kim L. Gratz;Milton Z. Brown;Milton Z. Brown

  • Measurement of Deliberate Self-Harm: Preliminary Data on the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory

    Kim L. Gratz

  • Risk factors for deliberate self-harm among college students.

    Kim L. Gratz;Sheree Dukes Conrad;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16

    Johan Bjureberg;Brjánn Ljótsson;Matthew T. Tull;Erik Hedman

  • Preliminary data on an acceptance-based emotion regulation group intervention for deliberate self-harm among women with borderline personality disorder

    Kim L. Gratz;John G. Gunderson

  • Risk Factors for and Functions of Deliberate Self‐Harm: An Empirical and Conceptual Review

    Kim L Gratz

  • An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder.

    Kim L. Gratz;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Matthew T. Tull;C. W. Lejuez

  • Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale

    Unknown

  • Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.

    Anna Neumann;Pol A. C. van Lier;Kim L. Gratz;Hans M. Koot

  • Risk factors for deliberate self-harm among female college students: the role and interaction of childhood maltreatment, emotional inexpressivity, and affect intensity/reactivity.

    Kim L. Gratz

  • The relationship between emotion dysregulation and deliberate self-harm among female undergraduate students at an urban commuter university.

    Kim L. Gratz;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Emotion regulation as a mechanism of change in acceptance- and mindfulness-based treatments.

    Kim L. Gratz;Matthew T. Tull

  • The role of experiential avoidance in posttraumatic stress symptoms and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization.

    Matthew T. Tull;Kim L. Gratz;Kristalyn Salters;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Targeting emotion dysregulation in the treatment of self-injury.

    Kim L. Gratz

  • Impulsive behaviors as an emotion regulation strategy: examining associations between PTSD, emotion dysregulation, and impulsive behaviors among substance dependent inpatients.

    Nicole H. Weiss;Matthew T. Tull;Andres G. Viana;Michael D. Anestis

  • Borderline personality disorder and emotional responding: a review of the research literature.

    M. Zachary Rosenthal;Kim L. Gratz;David S. Kosson;Jennifer S. Cheavens

  • The role of emotional responding and childhood maltreatment in the development and maintenance of deliberate self-harm among male undergraduates.

    Kim L. Gratz;Alexander L. Chapman

  • A laboratory-based study of the relationship between childhood abuse and experiential avoidance among inner-city substance users: the role of emotional nonacceptance

    Kim L Gratz;Marina Bornovalova;Ayesha Delany-Brumsey;Bettina Nick

  • The Relationship Between Emotion Dysregulation and Deliberate Self-Harm Among Inpatients with Substance Use Disorders

    Kim L. Gratz;Matthew T. Tull

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew T. Tull
Matthew T. Tull University of Toledo
Nicole H. Weiss
Nicole H. Weiss University of Rhode Island
Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon
Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon University of Massachusetts Amherst
Carl W. Lejuez
Carl W. Lejuez Stony Brook University
Michael D. Anestis
Michael D. Anestis Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Terri L. Messman-Moore
Terri L. Messman-Moore Miami University
David DiLillo
David DiLillo University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Jason M. Lavender
Jason M. Lavender Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Nathan A. Kimbrel
Nathan A. Kimbrel Duke University
Alexander L. Chapman
Alexander L. Chapman Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, both online and on campus. Many students explore online degrees as a flexible way to complete their education while balancing other commitments. Popular career options include counseling, mental health services, school psychology, and clinical therapy.

If you're considering a future as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), each state and city has unique licensing requirements. For a localized overview, see the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Durham, or read about the specific process for becoming a licensed therapist in El Paso. Requirements often include accredited coursework, supervised clinical hours, examinations, and background checks.

Navigating these pathways can vary by location. Understanding the steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Fort Wayne or how to become a licensed therapist in Fort Worth helps new graduates plan next steps. With the right preparation and guidance, a background in Psychology can lead to a meaningful and rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Kim L. Gratz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles