World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
19725
World Ranking
1965
National Ranking
1149

Matthew T. Tull publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew T. Tull sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 252 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew T. Tull D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew T. Tull sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew T. Tull is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a strong focus on clinical psychology. Their research encompasses a wide range of topics within psychology, including clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work includes a significant focus on areas such as suicide and self-harm studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, personality disorders and psychopathology, COVID-19 and mental health, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, posttraumatic stress disorder research, and broader mental health research topics.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Life (2020, Psychiatry Research)
  • The prospective influence of COVID-19 affective risk assessments and intolerance of uncertainty on later dimensions of health anxiety (2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Matthew T. Tull include:

  • Kim L. Gratz
  • Julia R. Richmond
  • Kayla M. Scamaldo
  • Keith A. Edmonds
  • Jason P. Rose

The primary outlets for the scientist's work have been scholarly journals such as Psychiatry Research, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, and Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science.

The research has investigated various psychological phenomena, including the psychological impact of COVID-19 restrictions, the role of social and economic consequences in suicide risk, and dimensions of health anxiety related to pandemic conditions.

This body of work contributes data and insights pertinent to contemporary mental health concerns, particularly during times of societal disruption. The research outputs have also engaged with issues surrounding emotion dysregulation and adherence to social distancing guidelines, considering influences such as pseudoscientific beliefs and political affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16

    Johan Bjureberg;Brjánn Ljótsson;Matthew T. Tull;Erik Hedman

  • Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Life.

    Matthew T. Tull;Keith A. Edmonds;Kayla M. Scamaldo;Julia R. Richmond

  • A preliminary investigation of the relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and posttraumatic stress symptoms.

    Matthew T. Tull;Heidi M. Barrett;Elaine S. McMillan;Lizabeth Roemer

  • An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder.

    Kim L. Gratz;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Matthew T. Tull;C. W. Lejuez

  • Evidence of Broad Deficits in Emotion Regulation Associated with Chronic Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Kristalyn Salters-Pedneault;Kristalyn Salters-Pedneault;Lizabeth Roemer;Lizabeth Roemer;Matthew T. Tull;Matthew T. Tull;Latanya Rucker

  • Emotion regulation as a mechanism of change in acceptance- and mindfulness-based treatments.

    Kim L. Gratz;Matthew T. Tull

  • Anxiety, anxiety disorders, tobacco use, and nicotine: a critical review of interrelationships.

    Sandra Baker Morissette;Matthew T. Tull;Suzy Bird Gulliver;Barbara Wolfsdorf Kamholz

  • The role of experiential avoidance in posttraumatic stress symptoms and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization.

    Matthew T. Tull;Kim L. Gratz;Kristalyn Salters;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Editorial overview: New directions in the science of emotion regulation

    Matthew T Tull;Amelia Aldao

  • Clarifying the role of emotion dysregulation in the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior in an undergraduate sample.

    Michael D. Anestis;Michael D. Anestis;Courtney L. Bagge;Matthew T. Tull;Thomas E. Joiner

  • Impulsive behaviors as an emotion regulation strategy: examining associations between PTSD, emotion dysregulation, and impulsive behaviors among substance dependent inpatients.

    Nicole H. Weiss;Matthew T. Tull;Andres G. Viana;Michael D. Anestis

  • Emotion regulation difficulties associated with the experience of uncued panic attacks: evidence of experiential avoidance, emotional nonacceptance, and decreased emotional clarity.

    Matthew T. Tull;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Randomized controlled trial of behavioral activation smoking cessation treatment for smokers with elevated depressive symptoms.

    Laura MacPherson;Matthew T. Tull;Alexis K. Matusiewicz;Samantha Rodman

  • Examining Emotion Regulation as an Outcome, Mechanism, or Target of Psychological Treatments.

    Kim L Gratz;Nicole H Weiss;Matthew T Tull

  • PTSD symptom clusters in relationship to alcohol misuse among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking post-deployment VA health care

    Matthew Jakupcak;Matthew T. Tull;Michael J. McDermott;Debra Kaysen

  • The Relationship Between Emotion Dysregulation and Deliberate Self-Harm Among Inpatients with Substance Use Disorders

    Kim L. Gratz;Matthew T. Tull

  • The role of avoidance of emotional material in the anxiety disorders

    Kristalyn Salters-Pedneault;Matthew T. Tull;Lizabeth Roemer

  • The relative and unique contributions of emotion dysregulation and impulsivity to posttraumatic stress disorder among substance dependent inpatients

    Nicole H. Weiss;Matthew T. Tull;Michael D. Anestis;Kim L. Gratz

  • Masculinity, Shame, and Fear of Emotions as Predictors of Men's Expressions of Anger and Hostility.

    Matthew Jakupcak;Matthew T. Tull;Lizabeth Roemer

  • Explicating the role of emotion dysregulation in risky behaviors: a review and synthesis of the literature with directions for future research and clinical practice☆

    Nicole H Weiss;Tami P Sullivan;Matthew T Tull

Frequent Co-Authors

Kim L. Gratz
Kim L. Gratz University of Toledo
Nicole H. Weiss
Nicole H. Weiss University of Rhode Island
Carl W. Lejuez
Carl W. Lejuez Stony Brook University
Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon
Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon University of Massachusetts Amherst
Michael D. Anestis
Michael D. Anestis Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jason M. Lavender
Jason M. Lavender Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Lizabeth Roemer
Lizabeth Roemer University of Massachusetts Boston
Joseph R. Bardeen
Joseph R. Bardeen Northern Illinois University
Matthew Jakupcak
Matthew Jakupcak University of Washington
Robert D. Latzman
Robert D. Latzman Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying psychology in the USA, there are many online degrees and career routes to explore. Pursuing an online psychology degree opens the door to a range of specializations—such as counseling, clinical psychology, school psychology, and mental health services. These programs are ideal for those seeking flexible learning while preparing for licensure or certification.

For students interested in becoming counselors, state-specific pathways exist to help accelerate your career. For example, New Jersey residents can learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in New Jersey. Similarly, there are options for the fastest way to become a counselor in New Mexico, or you can explore New York accelerated counseling programs. If you reside in the Southeast, check the fastest way to become a counselor in North Carolina.

Online psychology programs and accelerated state pathways help you gain qualifications rapidly, letting you start your professional journey sooner. Make sure to verify licensure requirements in your state as you plan your academic path.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew T. Tull

Trending Scientists