World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11015
World Ranking
5880
National Ranking
3191

Robert D. Latzman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Latzman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert D. Latzman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Latzman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert D. Latzman is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with notable contributions spanning clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, philosophy, and social psychology.

Their work encompasses a range of main topics including mental health research, personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health and psychiatry, functional brain connectivity studies, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry and sexual offending, personality traits, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Recent notable publications by Robert D. Latzman include:

  • Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020) in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence (2021) in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Validity and Utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing Superspectrum (2021) in World Psychiatry
  • Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A New Interface for Advancing Psychiatric Nosology and Neuroscience (2021) in Clinical Psychology Review
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in Psychiatric Practice and Research (2022) in Psychological Medicine

Robert D. Latzman frequently publishes in several specific venues, including:

  • Journal of Personality Disorders
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • Clinical Psychological Science

Collaborations feature prominently in their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Christopher J. Patrick
  • Colin G. DeYoung
  • Isabella M. Palumbo
  • Robert F. Krueger
  • Roman Kotov

The breadth of Robert D. Latzman's research intersects multiple fields and subfields, reflecting a comprehensive engagement with topics related to mental health, psychopathology, brain connectivity, and personality assessment.

Best Publications

  • Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Craig A. Harper;Liam P. Satchell;Dean Fido;Robert D. Latzman

  • Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology.

    Joanna M. Berg;Robert D. Latzman;Nancy G. Bliwise;Scott O. Lilienfeld

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;David C. Cicero

  • Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies☆

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Lorie A. Ritschel;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • The contribution of executive functioning to academic achievement among male adolescents.

    Robert D Latzman;Natasha Elkovitch;John Young;Lee Anna Clark

  • Why Ineffective Psychotherapies Appear to Work: A Taxonomy of Causes of Spurious Therapeutic Effectiveness

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Lorie A. Ritschel;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A new interface for advancing psychiatric nosology and neuroscience

    Giorgia Michelini;Isabella M. Palumbo;Colin G. DeYoung;Robert D. Latzman

  • Psychopathy Deconstructed and Reconstructed: Identifying and Assembling the Personality Building Blocks of Cleckley's Chimera.

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Ashley L. Watts;Sarah Francis Smith;Joanna M. Berg

  • Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Robert D. Latzman;Ashley L. Watts;Sarah F. Smith

  • Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation

    Matthew T. Tull;Kim L. Gratz;Robert D. Latzman;Nathan A. Kimbrel

  • The Factor Structure and Age-Related Factorial Invariance of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS)

    Robert D. Latzman;Kristian E. Markon

  • Is boldness relevant to psychopathic personality? Meta-analytic relations with non-Psychopathy Checklist-based measures of psychopathy.

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Sarah Francis Smith;Katheryn C. Sauvigné;Christopher J. Patrick

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.

    Ashley L. Greene;Nicholas R. Eaton;Kaiqiao Li;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research

    Unknown

  • Understanding child sexual behavior problems: a developmental psychopathology framework

    Natasha Elkovitch;Robert D. Latzman;David J. Hansen;Mary Fran Flood

  • Examining mindfulness and psychological inflexibility within the framework of Big Five personality

    Robert D. Latzman;Akihiko Masuda

  • Fifty Psychological and Psychiatric Terms to Avoid: A List of Inaccurate, Misleading, Misused, Ambiguous, and Logically Confused Words and Phrases

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Katherine C. Sauvigné;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • Mindfulness Moderates the Relationship Between Disordered Eating Cognitions and Disordered Eating Behaviors in a Non-Clinical College Sample

    Akihiko Masuda;Matthew Price;Robert D. Latzman

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
William D. Hopkins
William D. Hopkins University of Wisconsin–Madison
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Steven J. Schapiro
Steven J. Schapiro The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Lee Anna Clark
Lee Anna Clark University of Notre Dame
Ashley L. Watts
Ashley L. Watts Vanderbilt University
Colin G. DeYoung
Colin G. DeYoung University of Minnesota
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing psychology in the USA, a range of related online degrees and career pathways are available. Moving beyond traditional psychology programs, many prospective students opt for specialized degrees in counseling, which offer versatile options and strong job outlooks.

When considering your academic journey, location matters. If you’re exploring options in Pennsylvania, consult the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania to identify top schools and programs. Alternatively, those based in Philadelphia can discover local opportunities by reviewing the best value counseling degrees in Philadelphia, ensuring both quality education and cost-effectiveness.

Seattle is also an excellent hub for aspiring counselors. For options in the Pacific Northwest, applicants should look at the best value counseling degrees in Seattle. Students in the southern United States can review the best value counseling programs in Texas for additional cost-effective, high-quality programs.

Earning a counseling or psychology degree online can open doors to careers in mental health, social services, research, and education. Be sure to compare program rankings, tuition costs, and licensing outcomes to maximize the return on your educational investment.

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. Latzman

Trending Scientists