World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5880 5465 3191 2896 175 11015

Robert D. Latzman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert D. Latzman between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert D. Latzman published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 21 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 8 publications
2005 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert D. Latzman: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 2
2009 4
2010 5
2011 7
2012 5
2013 10
2014 12
2015 20
2016 11
2017 12
2018 6
2019 14
2020 24
2021 27
2022 12
2023 9
2024 13
2025 8
Total 203
Download as CSV

Robert D. Latzman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Latzman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert D. Latzman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Latzman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert D. Latzman is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with notable contributions spanning clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, philosophy, and social psychology.

Their work encompasses a range of main topics including mental health research, personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health and psychiatry, functional brain connectivity studies, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry and sexual offending, personality traits, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Recent notable publications by Robert D. Latzman include:

  • Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020) in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence (2021) in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Validity and Utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing Superspectrum (2021) in World Psychiatry
  • Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A New Interface for Advancing Psychiatric Nosology and Neuroscience (2021) in Clinical Psychology Review
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in Psychiatric Practice and Research (2022) in Psychological Medicine

Robert D. Latzman frequently publishes in several specific venues, including:

  • Journal of Personality Disorders
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • Clinical Psychological Science

Collaborations feature prominently in their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Christopher J. Patrick
  • Colin G. DeYoung
  • Isabella M. Palumbo
  • Robert F. Krueger
  • Roman Kotov

The breadth of Robert D. Latzman's research intersects multiple fields and subfields, reflecting a comprehensive engagement with topics related to mental health, psychopathology, brain connectivity, and personality assessment.

Best Publications

  • Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Craig A. Harper;Liam P. Satchell;Dean Fido;Robert D. Latzman

  • Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology.

    Joanna M. Berg;Robert D. Latzman;Nancy G. Bliwise;Scott O. Lilienfeld

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies☆

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Lorie A. Ritschel;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • The contribution of executive functioning to academic achievement among male adolescents.

    Robert D Latzman;Natasha Elkovitch;John Young;Lee Anna Clark

  • Why Ineffective Psychotherapies Appear to Work: A Taxonomy of Causes of Spurious Therapeutic Effectiveness

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Lorie A. Ritschel;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A new interface for advancing psychiatric nosology and neuroscience

    Giorgia Michelini;Isabella M. Palumbo;Colin G. DeYoung;Robert D. Latzman

  • Psychopathy Deconstructed and Reconstructed: Identifying and Assembling the Personality Building Blocks of Cleckley's Chimera.

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Ashley L. Watts;Sarah Francis Smith;Joanna M. Berg

  • Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Robert D. Latzman;Ashley L. Watts;Sarah F. Smith

  • Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation

    Matthew T. Tull;Kim L. Gratz;Robert D. Latzman;Nathan A. Kimbrel

  • The Factor Structure and Age-Related Factorial Invariance of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS)

    Robert D. Latzman;Kristian E. Markon

  • Is boldness relevant to psychopathic personality? Meta-analytic relations with non-Psychopathy Checklist-based measures of psychopathy.

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Sarah Francis Smith;Katheryn C. Sauvigné;Christopher J. Patrick

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.

    Ashley L. Greene;Nicholas R. Eaton;Kaiqiao Li;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research

    Unknown

  • Understanding child sexual behavior problems: a developmental psychopathology framework

    Natasha Elkovitch;Robert D. Latzman;David J. Hansen;Mary Fran Flood

  • Examining mindfulness and psychological inflexibility within the framework of Big Five personality

    Robert D. Latzman;Akihiko Masuda

  • Fifty Psychological and Psychiatric Terms to Avoid: A List of Inaccurate, Misleading, Misused, Ambiguous, and Logically Confused Words and Phrases

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Katherine C. Sauvigné;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • Mindfulness Moderates the Relationship Between Disordered Eating Cognitions and Disordered Eating Behaviors in a Non-Clinical College Sample

    Akihiko Masuda;Matthew Price;Robert D. Latzman

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
William D. Hopkins
William D. Hopkins University of Wisconsin–Madison
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Steven J. Schapiro
Steven J. Schapiro The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Lee Anna Clark
Lee Anna Clark University of Notre Dame
Ashley L. Watts
Ashley L. Watts Vanderbilt University
Colin G. DeYoung
Colin G. DeYoung University of Minnesota
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in pursuing psychology in the USA, a range of related online degrees and career pathways are available. Moving beyond traditional psychology programs, many prospective students opt for specialized degrees in counseling, which offer versatile options and strong job outlooks.

When considering your academic journey, location matters. If you’re exploring options in Pennsylvania, consult the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania to identify top schools and programs. Alternatively, those based in Philadelphia can discover local opportunities by reviewing the best value counseling degrees in Philadelphia, ensuring both quality education and cost-effectiveness.

Seattle is also an excellent hub for aspiring counselors. For options in the Pacific Northwest, applicants should look at the best value counseling degrees in Seattle. Students in the southern United States can review the best value counseling programs in Texas for additional cost-effective, high-quality programs.

Earning a counseling or psychology degree online can open doors to careers in mental health, social services, research, and education. Be sure to compare program rankings, tuition costs, and licensing outcomes to maximize the return on your educational investment.

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. Latzman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles