World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10741
World Ranking
5088
National Ranking
198

Cristina Conati publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cristina Conati sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Cristina Conati D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cristina Conati sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Cristina Conati is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and specializes in Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The body of their research encompasses a diverse range of topics, notably Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, Online Learning and Analytics, Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Retinal Imaging and Analysis, and Data Visualization and Analytics.

Among Cristina Conati's recent publications are:

  • "Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education" (2022) published in Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
  • "Knowing me, knowing you": personalized explanations for a music recommender system (2022) published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Comparing and Combining Interaction Data and Eye-tracking Data for the Real-time Prediction of User Cognitive Abilities in Visualization Tasks (2020) published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Leveraging Multi-task Machine Learning Analysis of Speech and Eye-Movement Data (2021) published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Classification of Alzheimer's Disease with Deep Learning on Eye-tracking Data (2023) published in INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Sébastien Lallé
  • Matteo Rizzo
  • Elisabeth André
  • Thalia S. Field
  • Giuseppe Carenini

The most frequent venues for publication are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia

Cristina Conati has been recognized as an ACM Distinguished Member as of 2020.

Best Publications

  • Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling

    Cristina Conati;Abigail Gertner;Kurt Vanlehn

  • Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games

    Cristina Conati

  • On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks

    Cristina Conati;Abigail S. Gertner;Kurt VanLehn;Marek J. Druzdzel

  • Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect

    Cristina Conati;Heather Maclaren

  • Toward Computer-Based Support of Meta-Cognitive Skills: a Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation

    Cristina Conati;Kurt Vanlehn

  • Procedural help in Andes: generating hints using a Bayesian network student model

    Abigail S. Gertner;Cristina Conati;Kurt VanLehn

  • Building and evaluating an intelligent pedagogical agent to improve the effectiveness of an educational game

    Cristina Conati;Xiaohong Zhao

  • Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Classification to Build User Models for Exploratory Learning Environments

    Saleema Amershi;Cristina Conati

  • Modeling Students' Emotions from Cognitive Appraisal in Educational Games

    Cristina Conati;Xiaoming Zhou

  • Eye-tracking for user modeling in exploratory learning environments: An empirical evaluation

    Cristina Conati;Christina Merten

  • User-adaptive information visualization: using eye gaze data to infer visualization tasks and user cognitive abilities

    Ben Steichen;Giuseppe Carenini;Cristina Conati

  • Individual user characteristics and information visualization: connecting the dots through eye tracking

    Dereck Toker;Cristina Conati;Ben Steichen;Giuseppe Carenini

  • Predicting Affect from Gaze Data during Interaction with an Intelligent Tutoring System

    Natasha Jaques;Cristina Conati;Jason M. Harley;Roger Azevedo

  • Probabilistic Student Modelling to Improve Exploratory Behaviour

    Andrea Bunt;Cristina Conati

  • Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Classification to Build User Models for Exploratory

    Saleema Amershi;Cristina Conati

  • Supporting interface customization using a mixed-initiative approach

    Andrea Bunt;Cristina Conati;Joanna McGrenere

  • To explain or not to explain: the effects of personal characteristics when explaining music recommendations

    Martijn Millecamp;Nyi Nyi Htun;Cristina Conati;Katrien Verbert

  • Towards adaptive information visualization: on the influence of user characteristics

    Dereck Toker;Cristina Conati;Giuseppe Carenini;Mona Haraty

  • Exploring the role of individual differences in information visualization

    Cristina Conati;Heather Maclaren

  • User Modeling 2007

    Cristina Conati;Kathleen McCoy;Georgios Paliouras

  • Toward personalized XAI: A case study in intelligent tutoring systems

    Cristina Conati;Oswald Barral;Vanessa Putnam;Lea Rieger

  • User modeling 2007 : 11th International Conference, UM 2007 Corfu, Greece, June 25-29, 2007 : proceedings

    Cristina Conati;Kathleen McCoy;Georgios Paliouras

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Carenini
Giuseppe Carenini University of British Columbia
Kurt VanLehn
Kurt VanLehn Arizona State University
Roger Azevedo
Roger Azevedo University of Central Florida
Joanna McGrenere
Joanna McGrenere University of British Columbia
Ido Roll
Ido Roll Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Antonija Mitrovic
Antonija Mitrovic University of Canterbury
Toon Calders
Toon Calders University of Antwerp
Ryan S. Baker
Ryan S. Baker University of Pennsylvania
Mykola Pechenizkiy
Mykola Pechenizkiy Eindhoven University of Technology
David Poole
David Poole University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. Choosing the right path often involves weighing factors such as program cost, accreditation, flexibility, and career goals.

For example, if you are interested in law enforcement or cybersecurity fields, consider the cost of criminal justice degree programs to find options that fit your budget. Those with an interest in finance or data reporting can explore accredited online accounting degree programs, which emphasize both affordability and industry recognition.

The tech landscape is rapidly evolving, making advanced data skills highly valuable. An online data science masters can complement a computer science background and help unlock roles in analytics, AI, and big data. Similarly, for those looking to move quickly into management roles in technical fields, the fastest online construction management degree programs offer accelerated pathways into project management and leadership within the construction, engineering, and tech industries.

Best Scientists Citing Cristina Conati

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles