World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
8443
World Ranking
7552
National Ranking
19

Antonija Mitrovic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonija Mitrovic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 217 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antonija Mitrovic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonija Mitrovic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Antonija Mitrovic is affiliated with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with particular attention to applications within this domain. The main areas of study include Computer Science Applications, Education, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The topics of research explored by Antonija Mitrovic cover Online Learning and Analytics, Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, Educational Games and Gamification, Online and Blended Learning, Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, and Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements.

Antonija Mitrovic has contributed to various recent academic papers. Selected works include:

  • Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021, Aerospace)
  • Assessment of the Effect of Cleanliness on the Visual Inspection of Aircraft Engine Blades: An Eye Tracking Study (2021, Sensors)
  • Investigating the effect of nudges for improving comment quality in active video watching (2021, Computers & Education)
  • Investigating the causal relationships between badges and learning outcomes in SQL-Tutor (2022, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning)
  • Choice Architecture for Nudges to Support Constructive Learning in Active Video Watching (2021, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education)

Their frequent coauthors include Matthias Galster, Sanna Malinen, Jay Holland, Pasan Peiris, and Raul Vincent Lumapas.

Antonija Mitrovic has published extensively in venues such as the International Conference on Computers in Education, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Aerospace, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, and Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks.

In recognition of professional contributions, Antonija Mitrovic was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2014.

Best Publications

  • An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web

    Antonija Mitrovic

  • Evaluation of a Constraint-Based Tutor for a Database Language

    Antonija Mitrovic;Stellan Ohlsson

  • Optimising ITS Behaviour with Bayesian Networks and Decision Theory

    Michael Mayo;Antonija Mitrovic

  • Intelligent Augmented Reality Training for Motherboard Assembly

    Giles Westerfield;Antonija Mitrovic;Mark Billinghurst

  • User Modeling 2005

    Liliana Ardissono;Paul Brna;Antonija Mitrovic

  • A comparative analysis of cognitive tutoring and constraint-based modeling

    Antonija Mitrovic;Kenneth R. Koedinger;Brent Martin

  • Proceedings of The 17th International Conference on Computers in Education

    Siu Cheung Kong;Hiroaki Ogata;Hans Christian Arnseth;Carol K. K. Chan

  • Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-Assessment

    Antonija Mitrovic;Brent Martin

  • Constraint-Based Tutors: A Success Story

    Antonija Mitrovic;Michael Mayo;Pramuditha Suraweera;Brent Martin

  • KERMIT: A Constraint-Based Tutor for Database Modeling

    Pramuditha Suraweera;Antonija Mitrovic

  • An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling

    Pramuditha Suraweera;Antonija Mitrovic

  • Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams

    Nilufar Baghaei;Antonija Mitrovic;Warwick Irwin

  • Intelligent Tutors for All: The Constraint-Based Approach

    A. Mitrovic;B. Martin;P. Suraweera

  • Using Evaluation to Shape ITS Design: Results and Experiences with SQL-Tutor

    Antonija Mitrovic;Brent Martin;Michael Mayo

  • Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning

    Antonija Mitrovic;Brent Martin

  • Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achieved and where we are going

    Antonija Mitrovic

  • Experiences in Implementing Constraint-Based Modeling in SQL-Tutor

    Antonija Mitrovic

  • Learning SQL with a computerized tutor

    Antonija Mitrovic

  • The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system

    Antonija Mitrovic;Stellan Ohlsson;Devon K. Barrow

  • Evaluating and improving adaptive educational systems with learning curves

    Brent Martin;Antonija Mitrovic;Kenneth R. Koedinger;Santosh Mathan

  • DB-Suite: Experiences with Three Intelligent, Web-Based Database Tutors.

    Antonija Mitrovic;Pramuditha Suraweera;Brent Martin;Amali Weerasinghe

Frequent Co-Authors

Stellan Ohlsson
Stellan Ohlsson University of Illinois at Chicago
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth R. Koedinger
Kenneth R. Koedinger Carnegie Mellon University
Bruce M. McLaren
Bruce M. McLaren Carnegie Mellon University
Ryan S. Baker
Ryan S. Baker University of Pennsylvania
Gautam Biswas
Gautam Biswas Vanderbilt University
Vincent Aleven
Vincent Aleven Carnegie Mellon University
Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Neil T. Heffernan
Neil T. Heffernan Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Lucy Johnston
Lucy Johnston University of Canterbury

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science opens up a variety of online degree and career pathways, allowing students to customize their education journey based on time, budget, and career goals.

For those looking for a fast entry into the workforce, 6 month associate degree online programs provide a quick route to a foundational qualification. These programs can be a stepping stone to further studies or entry-level tech jobs.

If affordability is a primary concern, there are many affordable online bachelor degree programs available, making a Computer Science degree more accessible than ever.

Prospective students interested in the business side of technology can consider the online business degree cost to compare options that combine business fundamentals with tech skills.

Additionally, those with an engineering focus should research online engineering degree cost to find programs that fit both educational and financial needs.

With these diverse online pathways, students can tailor their education to align with evolving tech industry demands and their own career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Antonija Mitrovic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles