World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
6854
World Ranking
7661
National Ranking
459

Susan Bull publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Bull sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Susan Bull D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Bull sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan Bull is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on applications of Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research addresses a range of topics, including:

  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Open Education and E-Learning

Susan Bull has published in several academic venues, notably:

  • IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Their recent publications include:

  • "There are Open Learner Models About!", 2020, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • "Jim Greer's 25-Year Influence on a Research Programme on Open Learner Models", 2021, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

These works engage with topics closely related to the development and analysis of Open Learner Models and adaptive learning technologies, often situated within educational contexts that emphasize learner interaction and personalized feedback.

Best Publications

  • Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI:() Open Learner Modelling Framework

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • Bringing Chatbots into education: Towards Natural Language Negotiation of Open Learner Models

    Alice Kerlyl;Phil Hall;Susan Bull

  • Evaluation of a Mobile Learning Organiser for University Students

    Daniel Corlett;Michael Sharples;Susan Bull;Tony Chan

  • CALMsystem: A Conversational Agent for Learner Modelling

    Alice Kerly;Richard Ellis;Susan Bull

  • Bringing chatbots into education: Towards natural language negotiation of open learner models

    Alice Kerly;Phil Hall;Susan Bull

  • Open Learner Models

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • SMILI☺: a Framework for Interfaces to Learning Data in Open Learner Models, Learning Analytics and Related Fields

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • Context and Learner Modelling for the Mobile Foreign Language Learner

    Yanchun Cui;Susan Bull

  • Extending the scope of the student model

    Susan Bull;Paul Brna;Helen Pain

  • Conversational Agents in E-Learning

    Alice Kerry;Richard Ellis;Susan Bull

  • Open Learner Models as Drivers for Metacognitive Processes

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • Lessons Learned in Deploying a Multi-Agent Learning Support System: The I-Help Experience

    Jim Greer;Gordon McCalla;Julita Vassileva;Ralph Deters

  • Helping Learners to Understand Themselves with a Learner Model Open to Students, Peers and Instructors

    Susan Bull;Theson Nghiem

  • Student preferences for editing, persuading, and negotiating the open learner model

    Andrew Mabbott;Susan Bull

  • Active Learner Modelling

    Gordon I. McCalla;Julita Vassileva;Jim E. Greer;Susan Bull

  • Designing learner-controlled educational interactions based on learning/cognitive style and learner behaviour

    Kyparisia A. Papanikolaou;Andrew Mabbott;Susan Bull;Maria Grigoriadou

  • Towards visual analytics for teachers' dynamic diagnostic pedagogical decision-making

    Ravi Vatrapu;Chris Teplovs;Nobuko Fujita;Susan Bull

  • Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.

    S Bull;P Y Cheah;S Denny;I Jao

  • Alternative Views on Knowledge: Presentation of Open Learner Models

    Andrew Mabbott;Susan Bull

  • User Modelling in I-Help: What, Why, When and How

    Susan Bull;Jim E. Greer;Gordon I. McCalla;Lori Kettel

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy Kay
Judy Kay University of Sydney
Mike Sharples
Mike Sharples The Open University
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Julita Vassileva
Julita Vassileva University of Saskatchewan
Gautam Biswas
Gautam Biswas Vanderbilt University
Antonija Mitrovic
Antonija Mitrovic University of Canterbury
Chee-Kit Looi
Chee-Kit Looi Nanyang Technological University
Christian D. Schunn
Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh
Michael J. Lancaster
Michael J. Lancaster University of Birmingham
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a range of flexible online degrees and career opportunities. For those aiming to fast-track their education, consider the shortest online masters degree programs, which can help you enter the workforce sooner without sacrificing educational quality.

If you're evaluating the ROI of graduate education, researching the best masters degree to get ensures your skills remain in high demand by employers.

For those just starting or seeking a cost-effective introduction, an online associate's degree in Computer Science can build foundational skills and set the stage for further studies or immediate job opportunities.

Affordability is a key factor, and with the cheapest online colleges, you can earn a respected degree without breaking the bank.

Whether you’re looking to accelerate your education, find high-value degrees, or minimize costs, a wealth of routes into Computer Science careers are available online to fit a variety of needs and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Bull

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles