World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 69 790 690 148 132 325 41432

Michael Parker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Parker between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Parker published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 86 publications in 2023. 59 of the 536 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 86. Peak 86 publications in 2023. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 86 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 25 publications
1977 2025

536 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Parker: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 2
2000 6
2001 9
2002 9
2003 6
2004 15
2005 14
2006 11
2007 18
2008 11
2009 13
2010 17
2011 16
2012 19
2013 17
2014 26
2015 37
2016 19
2017 21
2018 21
2019 20
2020 23
2021 10
2022 19
2023 86
2024 34
2025 25
Total 536
Download as CSV

Michael Parker publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Parker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 324–333 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 325 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81 325
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Parker D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Parker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40 69
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Parker is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. The scientist's work contributes significantly to various subfields, including Molecular Biology, Immunology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, and Ecology.

Their most recent published papers include:

  • Inhibition of ATP-citrate lyase improves NASH, liver fibrosis, and dyslipidemia (2022, Cell Metabolism)
  • Drug repurposing: Misconceptions, challenges, and opportunities for academic researchers (2021, Science Translational Medicine)
  • Long-chain fatty acyl-CoA esters regulate metabolism via allosteric control of AMPK β1 isoforms (2020, Nature Metabolism)
  • An ALYREF-MYCN coactivator complex drives neuroblastoma tumorigenesis through effects on USP3 and MYCN stability (2021, Nature Communications)
  • C-reactive protein, immunothrombosis and venous thromboembolism (2022, Frontiers in Immunology)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Craig J. Morton
  • Tracy L. Nero
  • Michelle P. Christie
  • Angel F. López
  • Karen S. Cheung Tung Shing

The scientist publishes regularly in several academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances
  • Nature Communications
  • eLife
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry

Their research topics cover areas including:

  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

Best Publications

  • A global reference for human genetic variation.

    Adam Auton;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David M. Altshuler;Richard M. Durbin

  • Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Govind Persad;Ross Upshur;Beatriz Thome

  • International network of cancer genome projects

    Thomas J. Hudson;Thomas J. Hudson;Warwick Anderson;Axel Aretz;Anna D. Barker

  • A global reference for human genetic variation

    Adam Auton;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David M. Altshuler;Richard M. Durbin

  • Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data

    Caroline F Wright;Tomas W Fitzgerald;Wendy D Jones;Stephen Clayton

  • Rowe and Kahn's Model of Successful Aging Revisited: Positive Spirituality--The Forgotten Factor.

    Martha R. Crowther;Michael W. Parker;W. A. Achenbaum;Walter L. Larimore

  • Mutations in LRP5 or FZD4 underlie the common familial exudative vitreoretinopathy locus on chromosome 11q.

    Carmel Toomes;Helen M. Bottomley;Richard M. Jackson;Katherine V. Towns

  • Making new genetic diagnoses with old data: iterative reanalysis and reporting from genome-wide data in 1,133 families with developmental disorders

    Caroline F Wright;Caroline F Wright;Jeremy F McRae;Stephen Clayton;Giuseppe Gallone

  • Mutations in DDX3X are a common cause of unexplained intellectual disability with gender-specific effects on wnt signaling

    Lot Snijders Blok;Erik Madsen;Jane Juusola;Christian Gilissen

  • Histone Lysine Methylases and Demethylases in the Landscape of Human Developmental Disorders

    Víctor Faundes;Víctor Faundes;William G. Newman;Laura Bernardini;Natalie Canham

  • Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers' Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research.

    Michael Parker;Patricia Kingori

  • Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.

    Anna Middleton;Katherine I Morley;Katherine I Morley;Eugene Bragin;Helen V Firth

  • Deciding for imperilled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy?

    Hazel E McHaffie;Ian A Laing;Michael Parker;John McMillan

  • How genetically heterogeneous is Kabuki syndrome?: MLL2 testing in 116 patients, review and analyses of mutation and phenotypic spectrum

    Siddharth Banka;Ratna Veeramachaneni;William Reardon;Emma Howard

  • Religiosity and mental health in southern, community-dwelling older adults.

    Michael Parker;L. Lee Roff;D. L. Klemmack;H. G. Koenig

  • A qualitative study of health system barriers to accessibility and utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana after user-fee abolition

    John Kuumuori Ganle;Michael Parker;Raymond Fitzpatrick;Easmon Otupiri

  • Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries.

    Jantina de Vries;Jantina de Vries;Susan J Bull;Susan J Bull;Ogobara Doumbo;Muntaser Ibrahim

  • Should clinicians incorporate positive spirituality into their practices? What does the evidence say?

    Walter L. Larimore;Michael Parker;Martha Crowther

  • Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

    Michael P. Mackley;Benjamin Fletcher;Michael Parker;Hugh Watkins

  • Genetic information: a joint account?

    Michael Parker;Anneke M Lucassen

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Bull
Susan Bull University of Oxford
Matthew E. Hurles
Matthew E. Hurles Wellcome Sanger Institute
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski University of Oxford
Caroline F. Wright
Caroline F. Wright Wellcome Sanger Institute
Helen V. Firth
Helen V. Firth University of Cambridge
Sassy Molyneux
Sassy Molyneux University of Oxford
David R. FitzPatrick
David R. FitzPatrick University of Edinburgh
Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig Duke University
Jill Clayton-Smith
Jill Clayton-Smith University of Manchester
Richard M. Allman
Richard M. Allman George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Opportunities abound for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, especially through online degree programs that offer flexibility and accessibility. When researching a program, the psychology degree cost is an important consideration, with affordable online options making this pathway more attainable for many.

If your goal is a career in social work, seeking out the online master's in social work programs that are both reputable and easier to access can help you get started quickly and efficiently. Similarly, those interested in clinical psychology may consider doctoral programs such as the psyd program, which are available online and may offer specialized training for licensure.

For students eager to complete their education in a shorter span, accelerated online mft programs allow you to enter the workforce faster as a marriage and family therapist. Each of these online pathways can lead to diverse roles in counseling, therapy, research, education, and beyond—opening multiple career doors within the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles