World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
74
Citations
46196
World Ranking
1928
National Ranking
885

Mark Johnston publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Johnston sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 132 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Mark Johnston D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Johnston sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Mark Johnston is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, with a notable focus on molecular biology and plant science. They have contributed to related subfields such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, pharmacology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of interests, including cellular transport mechanisms, peer review practices, and clinical physiotherapy management. Notable papers include:

  • Deciphering anomalous heterogeneous intracellular transport with neural networks, 2020, eLife
  • Opening up Peer Review, 2020, Genetics
  • Physiotherapy management of first nations children with bronchiectasis from remote top end communities of the northern territory: a retrospective chart audit, 2023, Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • Opening up Peer Review, 2020, Genetics
  • Faculty Opinions recommendation of Pathogen Genetic Control of Transcriptome Variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana - Botrytis cinerea Pathosystem, 2020, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature

Mark Johnston has published extensively in the venue Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, with 25 publications, alongside contributions to Genetics, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), eLife, and Frontiers in Pediatrics.

The main scientific themes covered in their work include genetic and biomedical research, fungal biology and its applications, and plant-fungal interactions. Specific research topics frequently addressed in their publications are:

  • Fungal Biology and Applications
  • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Plant and fungal interactions
  • Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
  • Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

They have collaborated with several researchers on multiple occasions. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Daniel Han
  • Viki Allan
  • Sergei Fedotov
  • Tracey A DePellegrin
  • A. Yu. Zubarev

Mark Johnston's recognition includes fellowships in significant scientific organizations, such as the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, awarded in 2012; the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2006; and the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1998.

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Peter Uetz;Loic Giot;Gerard Cagney;Traci A. Mansfield

  • Life with 6000 Genes

    André Goffeau;B G Barrell;H Bussey;R W Davis

  • Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

    Guri Giaever;Angela M. Chu;Li Ni;Carla Connelly

  • Functional Characterization of the S. cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis

    Elizabeth A. Winzeler;Daniel D. Shoemaker;Anna Astromoff;Hong Liang

  • Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    M Johnston;R W Davis

  • Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting.

    Paul Cliften;Priya Sudarsanam;Ashwin Desikan;Lucinda Fulton

  • A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    M Johnston

  • The Paf1 complex is required for histone H3 methylation by COMPASS and Dot1p: linking transcriptional elongation to histone methylation.

    Nevan J. Krogan;Jim Dover;Adam Wood;Jessica Schneider

  • Function and Regulation of Yeast Hexose Transporters

    Sabire Özcan;Mark Johnston

  • Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast

    Diego Libkind;Chris Todd Hittinger;Elisabete Valério;Carla Gonçalves

  • COMPASS: A complex of proteins associated with a trithorax-related SET domain protein

    Trissa Miller;Nevan J. Krogan;Jim Dover;H. Erdjument-Bromage

  • Identification of the DNA binding site for NGFI-B by genetic selection in yeast.

    Thomas E. Wilson;Timothy J. Fahrner;Mark Johnston;Jeffrey Milbrandt

  • Methylation of Histone H3 by COMPASS Requires Ubiquitination of Histone H2B by Rad6

    Jim Dover;Jessica Schneider;Mary Anne Tawiah-Boateng;Adam Wood

  • Bre1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase required for recruitment and substrate selection of Rad6 at a promoter.

    Adam Wood;Nevan J Krogan;Jim Dover;Jessica Schneider

  • Green Fluorescent Protein as a Marker for Gene Expression and Subcellular Localization in Budding Yeast

    R. K. Niedenthal;L. Riles;M. Johnston;J. H. Hegemann

  • Two glucose transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are glucose sensors that generate a signal for induction of gene expression

    Sabire Ozcan;Jim Dover;Anne G. Rosenwald;Stefan Wolfl

  • Regulated nuclear translocation of the Mig1 glucose repressor.

    M J De Vit;J A Waddle;M Johnston

  • COMPASS, a histone H3 (Lysine 4) methyltransferase required for telomeric silencing of gene expression.

    Nevan J. Krogan;Jim Dover;Shahram Khorrami;Jack F. Greenblatt

  • Three different regulatory mechanisms enable yeast hexose transporter (HXT) genes to be induced by different levels of glucose.

    S Ozcan;M Johnston

  • Feasting, fasting and fermenting: glucose sensing in yeast and other cells

    Mark Johnston

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali Shilatifard
Ali Shilatifard Northwestern University
Chris Todd Hittinger
Chris Todd Hittinger University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stanley Fields
Stanley Fields University of Washington
Nevan J. Krogan
Nevan J. Krogan University of California, San Francisco
Jack Greenblatt
Jack Greenblatt University of Toronto
Antonis Rokas
Antonis Rokas Vanderbilt University
Ronald W. Davis
Ronald W. Davis Stanford University
Ronald M. Gilgenbach
Ronald M. Gilgenbach University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael Snyder
Michael Snyder Stanford University
Lucinda Fulton
Lucinda Fulton Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Genetics, there are several related online degree and career pathways to consider. Many students explore healthcare and science fields that link closely with genetics, such as nursing and healthcare administration. Choosing the right path depends on your career goals, timeline, and budget.

For those aiming for a quick entry into healthcare, a 10 month lpn program can provide a fast-track to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse. Aspiring nurses also have options like attending a nursing school without teas test, making the application process less daunting.

For research or administrative roles, advanced degrees can be highly valuable. Consider a masters in healthcare administration for leadership opportunities in hospitals or health organizations. If you’re interested in reaching the highest levels of research and teaching, explore phd in nursing online programs as an option.

Each of these online programs offers unique career opportunities and can complement or enhance your work in genetics and related sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Johnston

Trending Scientists