World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
82
Citations
45016
World Ranking
1447
National Ranking
49

Frederick P. Roth publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick P. Roth sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 193 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Frederick P. Roth D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick P. Roth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick P. Roth is affiliated with the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a total of 172 publications. Within this broad area, their work is concentrated on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Infectious Diseases, Cancer Research, and Cell Biology.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology

Frederick P. Roth has published extensively, with some recent papers illustrating the variety and scope of their work. Notable papers include:

  • A reference map of the human binary protein interactome (2020, Nature)
  • Systems analysis of RhoGEF and RhoGAP regulatory proteins reveals spatially organized RAC1 signalling from integrin adhesions (2020, Nature Cell Biology)
  • Improved pathogenicity prediction for rare human missense variants (2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • A SARS-CoV-2 - host proximity interactome (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • An Atlas of Variant Effects to understand the genome at nucleotide resolution (2023, Genome biology)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Genome biology, Preprints.org, The American Journal of Human Genetics, and Bioinformatics.

Frederick P. Roth has collaborated often with a group of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Jochen Weile
  • Atina G. Coté
  • Roujia Li
  • Dae-Kyum Kim
  • Nishka Kishore

Best Publications

  • Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network

    Jean François Rual;Kavitha Venkatesan;Tong Hao;Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa

  • The genetic landscape of a cell.

    Michael Costanzo;Anastasia Baryshnikova;Jeremy Bellay;Yungil Kim

  • Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network

    Amy Hin Yan Tong;Guillaume Lesage;Gary D. Bader;Huiming Ding

  • A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans

    Siming Li;Christopher M. Armstrong;Nicolas Bertin;Hui Ge

  • Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network

    Jing-Dong J. Han;Nicolas Bertin;Tong Hao;Debra S. Goldberg

  • High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network

    Haiyuan Yu;Pascal Braun;Muhammed A Yildirim;Irma Lemmens

  • High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities

    Traver Hart;Megha Chandrashekhar;Michael Aregger;Zachary Steinhart

  • A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network

    Thomas Rolland;Murat Taşan;Benoit Charloteaux;Samuel J. Pevzner

  • Finding DNA regulatory motifs within unaligned noncoding sequences clustered by whole-genome mRNA quantitation

    Frederick P. Roth;Jason D. Hughes;Preston W. Estep;George M. Church

  • An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping

    Kavitha Venkatesan;Kavitha Venkatesan;Jean François Rual;Alexei Vazquez;Alexei Vazquez;Ulrich Stelzl

  • A reference map of the human binary protein interactome

    Katja Luck;Dae Kyum Kim;Luke Lambourne;Kerstin Spirohn

  • Evidence for Network Evolution in an Arabidopsis Interactome Map

    Matija Dreze;Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis;Benoit Charloteaux

  • Independently evolved virulence effectors converge onto hubs in a plant immune system network

    M. Shahid Mukhtar;Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis;Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis;Matija Dreze;Matija Dreze;Petra Epple

  • A Highly Conserved Program of Neuronal Microexons Is Misregulated in Autistic Brains

    Manuel Irimia;Manuel Irimia;Robert J. Weatheritt;Jonathan D. Ellis;Neelroop N. Parikshak

  • Characterizing gene sets with FuncAssociate.

    Gabriel F. Berriz;Oliver D. King;Barbara Bryant;Chris Sander

  • Widespread Macromolecular Interaction Perturbations in Human Genetic Disorders

    Nidhi Sahni;Song Yi;Mikko Taipale;Juan I. Fuxman Bass

  • Widespread Expansion of Protein Interaction Capabilities by Alternative Splicing

    Xinping Yang;Xinping Yang;Jasmin Coulombe-Huntington;Shuli Kang;Gloria M. Sheynkman

  • Defining genetic interaction

    Ramamurthy Mani;Robert P. St.Onge;John L. Hartman;Guri Giaever

  • Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world

    Debra S. Goldberg;Frederick P. Roth

  • An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions

    Pascal Braun;Murat Tasan;Matija Dreze;Matija Dreze;Miriam Barrios-Rodiles

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Vidal
Marc Vidal Harvard University
David E. Hill
David E. Hill Harvard University
Albert-László Barabási
Albert-László Barabási Northeastern University
Yves Jacob
Yves Jacob Institut Pasteur
Anne-Claude Gingras
Anne-Claude Gingras Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Jan Tavernier
Jan Tavernier Ghent University
Patrick Aloy
Patrick Aloy Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Oliver D. King
Oliver D. King University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Charles Boone
Charles Boone University of Toronto
Brenda J. Andrews
Brenda J. Andrews University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Genetics, many online programs in healthcare and science offer flexible routes to rewarding careers. Nursing is a popular choice, and some of the best rn to bsn no clinical hours programs allow registered nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing fully online—eliminating the need for traditional clinical placements.

Advanced study is also possible with options like the fastest dnp program. These programs let you earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in a streamlined format, ideal for those looking to quickly advance their expertise in clinical leadership or research. If you’re seeking a more affordable doctoral option, consider the cheapest dnp programs online to keep educational costs in check while boosting your credentials.

For those eager to start their journey in healthcare, medical assistant training can be completed in as little as six weeks. This offers a fast track into clinical work while building a foundation for later genetics or advanced health studies.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick P. Roth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles