World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
94
Citations
48575
World Ranking
920
National Ranking
457

Molecular Biology

D-Index
94
Citations
48575
World Ranking
643
National Ranking
351

Edward M. Marcotte publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Marcotte sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 306 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Edward M. Marcotte D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Marcotte sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Edward M. Marcotte is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broader field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Spectroscopy, Genetics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, comprising Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases, Protist diversity and phylogeny, Microtubule and mitosis dynamics, Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology, and RNA Research and Splicing.

Among notable recent publications are:

  • The emerging landscape of single-molecule protein sequencing technologies, 2021, Nature Methods
  • A Pan-plant Protein Complex Map Reveals Deep Conservation and Novel Assemblies, 2020, Cell
  • Understudied proteins: opportunities and challenges for functional proteomics, 2022, Nature Methods
  • hu.MAP 2.0: integration of over 15,000 proteomic experiments builds a global compendium of human multiprotein assemblies, 2021, Molecular Systems Biology
  • HumanNet v3: an improved database of human gene networks for disease research, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative network include Ophelia Papoulas, Caitlyn L McCafferty, David W. Taylor, Claire D. McWhite, and Kevin Drew.

The scientist has published extensively in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature Communications, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Nature Methods.

Recognition of their work includes receiving the National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award in 2012 and being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses

    Christine Vogel;Edward M Marcotte

  • Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis protein phylogenetic profiles

    Matteo Pellegrini;Edward M. Marcotte;Michael J. Thompson;David Eisenberg

  • Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences

    Edward M Marcotte;Matteo Pellegrini;Ho Leung Ng;Danny W. Rice

  • The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa

    James E. Galagan;Sarah E. Calvo;Katherine A. Borkovich;Eric U. Selker

  • DIP: The Databases of Interacting Protein: 2001 update

    Ioannis Xenarios;Esteban Fernandez;Lukasz Salwinski;Xiaoqun Joyce Duan

  • Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels

    Raquel de Sousa Abreu;Luiz O. Penalva;Edward M. Marcotte;Christine Vogel

  • Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation

    Peng Lu;Christine Vogel;Rong Wang;Xin Yao

  • DIP: the Database of Interacting Proteins

    Ioannis Xenarios;Danny W. Rice;Lukasz Salwínski;Marisa K. Baron

  • A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function

    Edward M. Marcotte;Matteo Pellegrini;Michael J. Thompson;Todd O. Yeates

  • Protein function in the post-genomic era

    David Eisenberg;Edward M. Marcotte;Ioannis Xenarios;Todd O. Yeates

  • A census of human soluble protein complexes.

    Pierre C. Havugimana;G. Traver Hart;Tamás Nepusz;Haixuan Yang

  • Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis

    Adam M. Session;Adam M. Session;Yoshinobu Uno;Taejoon Kwon;Taejoon Kwon;Jarrod A. Chapman

  • A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes.

    Insuk Lee;Shailesh V. Date;Shailesh V. Date;Alex T. Adai;Alex T. Adai;Edward M. Marcotte

  • Engineering Escherichia coli to see light

    Anselm Levskaya;Aaron A. Chevalier;Jeffrey J. Tabor;Zachary Booth Simpson

  • Prioritizing candidate disease genes by network-based boosting of genome-wide association data

    Insuk Lee;U. Martin Blom;Peggy I. Wang;Jung Eun Shim

  • Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line

    Christine Vogel;Raquel de Sousa Abreu;Daijin Ko;Shu-Yun Le

  • Characterising and Predicting Haploinsufficiency in the Human Genome

    Ni Huang;Insuk Lee;Insuk Lee;Edward M. Marcotte;Matthew E. Hurles

  • A synthetic genetic edge detection program.

    Jeffrey J. Tabor;Howard M. Salis;Zachary Booth Simpson;Aaron A. Chevalier

  • Panorama of ancient metazoan macromolecular complexes

    Cuihong Wan;Cuihong Wan;Blake Borgeson;Sadhna Phanse;Fan Tu

  • How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks?

    G Traver Hart;Arun K Ramani;Arun K Ramani;Edward M Marcotte

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew D. Ellington
Andrew D. Ellington The University of Texas at Austin
John B. Wallingford
John B. Wallingford The University of Texas at Austin
Eric V. Anslyn
Eric V. Anslyn The University of Texas at Austin
David Eisenberg
David Eisenberg Harvard University
Pamela C. Ronald
Pamela C. Ronald University of California, Davis
George Georgiou
George Georgiou The University of Texas at Austin
Marvin Whiteley
Marvin Whiteley Georgia Institute of Technology
Claus O. Wilke
Claus O. Wilke The University of Texas at Austin
Todd O. Yeates
Todd O. Yeates University of California, Los Angeles
Matteo Pellegrini
Matteo Pellegrini University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Molecular Biology can broaden your career opportunities, especially in healthcare and research. For students interested in transitioning to the clinical side, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online offer a streamlined path to advanced nursing roles—even if your background isn't in nursing.

For current nurses seeking career advancement or specialization, consider online bridge programs. Many professionals compare the best value nursing education online wgu and other reputable institutions for affordability and flexibility. Those who already hold a BSN may be interested in the cheapest bsn to msn online bridge programs to efficiently move forward.

Quality matters just as much as cost. When comparing your options, look at the non profit online universities known for rigorous accreditation and excellent support services. Whether aiming for research, leadership, or clinical practice, choosing the right online pathway can set the foundation for a rewarding scientific or healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Edward M. Marcotte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles