World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
64
Citations
36296
World Ranking
2732
National Ranking
1199

Claus O. Wilke publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus O. Wilke sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Claus O. Wilke D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus O. Wilke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For discovering that biophysical constraints are a primary driver of protein sequence evolution

Overview

Claus O. Wilke is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research output spans primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on Molecular Biology as a subfield. Other notable subfields in their work include Ecology, Genetics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects within biology and computational methods, including:

  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Genomics and phylogenetic studies
  • Machine learning in bioinformatics
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Protein structure and dynamics
  • Chemical synthesis and analysis
  • Bacterial genetics and biotechnology

Wilke has contributed numerous papers to various publication venues, including significant contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 25 publications, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 5, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences with 4, The Journal of Open Source Software with 4, and Scientific Reports with 3.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Wilke feature topics relevant to protein function prediction, gene humanization, and CRISPR systems:

  • "BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains" (2021), published in PeerJ
  • "colorspace: A Toolbox for Manipulating and Assessing Colors and Palettes" (2020), published in Journal of Statistical Software
  • "Metagenomic discovery of CRISPR-associated transposons" (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Humanization of yeast genes with multiple human orthologs reveals functional divergence between paralogs" (2020), published in PLoS Biology
  • "Using machine learning to predict the effects and consequences of mutations in proteins" (2023), published in Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Wilke regularly collaborates with a core group of frequent coauthors, including Adam J. Hockenberry, Bryan W. Davies, Alexis M. Hill, Andrew D. Ellington, and Aaron L. Feller, reflecting ongoing partnerships across their research projects.

In 2019, Claus O. Wilke was recognized as a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) with a citation acknowledging the discovery that biophysical constraints are a primary driver of protein sequence evolution.

Best Publications

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Hadley Wickham;Mara Averick;Jennifer Bryan;Winston Chang

  • Mistranslation-Induced Protein Misfolding as a Dominant Constraint on Coding-Sequence Evolution

    D. Allan Drummond;Claus O. Wilke

  • Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly

    D. Allan Drummond;Jesse D. Bloom;Christoph Adami;Christoph Adami;Claus O. Wilke;Claus O. Wilke

  • Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest

    Claus O. Wilke;Jia Lan Wang;Charles Ofria;Richard E. Lenski

  • The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis

    D. Allan Drummond;Claus O. Wilke

  • A Single Determinant Dominates the Rate of Yeast Protein Evolution

    D. Allan Drummond;Alpan Raval;Alpan Raval;Claus O. Wilke

  • Systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity

    Aashiq H. Kachroo;Jon M. Laurent;Christopher M. Yellman;Austin G. Meyer

  • Maximum allowed solvent accessibilites of residues in proteins.

    Matthew Z. Tien;Austin G. Meyer;Austin G. Meyer;Dariya K. Sydykova;Stephanie J. Spielman

  • Residual Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viremia in Some Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy Is Dominated by a Small Number of Invariant Clones Rarely Found in Circulating CD4+ T Cells

    Justin R. Bailey;Ahmad R. Sedaghat;Tara Kieffer;Timothy Brennan

  • Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality

    Jesse D. Bloom;Jonathan J. Silberg;Claus O. Wilke;D. Allan Drummond

  • A Universal Trend of Reduced mRNA Stability near the Translation-Initiation Site in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes

    Wanjun Gu;Tong Zhou;Claus O. Wilke

  • Theory of Lethal Mutagenesis for Viruses

    J. J. Bull;R. Sanjuán;C. O. Wilke

  • Quasispecies theory in the context of population genetics

    Claus O Wilke;Claus O Wilke

  • Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites

    Julian Echave;Stephanie J. Spielman;Claus O. Wilke

  • Translationally Optimal Codons Associate with Structurally Sensitive Sites in Proteins

    Tong Zhou;Mason Weems;Claus O. Wilke

  • The traveling wave approach to asexual evolution: Muller’s ratchet and speed of adaptation

    Igor M. Rouzine;Éric Brunet;Claus O. Wilke

  • Structural Determinants of the Rate of Protein Evolution in Yeast

    Jesse D. Bloom;D. Allan Drummond;Frances H. Arnold;Claus O. Wilke

  • BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains.

    Adam J Hockenberry;Claus O Wilke

  • Thermodynamics of Neutral Protein Evolution

    Jesse D. Bloom;Alpan Raval;Claus O. Wilke

  • The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations.

    Claus O. Wilke

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Martinetz
Thomas Martinetz University of Lübeck
Robert F. Siliciano
Robert F. Siliciano Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Edward M. Marcotte
Edward M. Marcotte The University of Texas at Austin
Jeffrey E. Barrick
Jeffrey E. Barrick The University of Texas at Austin
Frances H. Arnold
Frances H. Arnold California Institute of Technology
Jesse D. Bloom
Jesse D. Bloom Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Charles Ofria
Charles Ofria Michigan State University
James J. Bull
James J. Bull University of Idaho
Richard E. Lenski
Richard E. Lenski Michigan State University
Janet D. Siliciano
Janet D. Siliciano Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens the door to a wide array of healthcare and science careers. For those looking to enter the medical field quickly, fast medical assistant programs offer accelerated pathways to hands-on roles in healthcare settings and can be completed in as little as six weeks.

Nursing professionals might consider advancing their education with the convenience of rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, which streamline the process while fitting around busy schedules. For those aspiring to achieve top clinical leadership, there are shortest dnp program online options that make earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice faster than ever.

If you’re already a master’s-prepared nurse, msn to dnp programs offer approachable and flexible routes to further expertise. These streamlined degree programs foster career advancement and personal growth, making them excellent complements to a foundational background in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Claus O. Wilke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles