World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
8635
World Ranking
18909
National Ranking
191

Tamir Tuller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamir Tuller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 286 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Tamir Tuller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamir Tuller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tamir Tuller is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and has made extensive contributions to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology. Their research spans various subfields including Genetics, Ecology, Plant Science, and Infectious Diseases.

The primary topics explored in their work include:

  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics

Tuller has published widely with frequent appearances in leading scientific journals. The venues where they have contributed most prolifically include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Genome biology

Among recent publications are:

  • Codon-based indices for modeling gene expression and transcript evolution, 2021, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Widespread non-modular overlapping codes in the coding regions*, 2020, Physical Biology
  • High-resolution modeling of the selection on local mRNA folding strength in coding sequences across the tree of life, 2020, Genome biology
  • MPEPE, a predictive approach to improve protein expression in E. coli based on deep learning, 2022, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Quantifying the distribution of protein oligomerization degree reflects cellular information capacity, 2020, Scientific Reports

Tamirs's research collaborations have involved several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Shaked Bergman
  • Matan Arbel
  • Itamar Menuhin-Gruman
  • Doron Naki
  • Zohar Zafrir

Best Publications

  • An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation.

    Tamir Tuller;Asaf Carmi;Kalin Vestsigian;Sivan Navon

  • The effect of tRNA levels on decoding times of mRNA codons

    Alexandra Dana;Tamir Tuller

  • The average common substring approach to phylogenomic reconstruction.

    Igor Ulitsky;David Burstein;Tamir Tuller;Benny Chor

  • Composite effects of gene determinants on the translation speed and density of ribosomes

    Tamir Tuller;Isana Veksler-Lublinsky;Nir Gazit;Martin Kupiec

  • Genome-scale analysis of translation elongation with a ribosome flow model.

    Shlomi Reuveni;Isaac Meilijson;Martin Kupiec;Eytan Ruppin

  • Multiple roles of the coding sequence 5′ end in gene expression regulation

    Tamir Tuller;Hadas Zur

  • Determinants of protein abundance and translation efficiency in S. cerevisiae.

    Tamir Tuller;Martin Kupiec;Eytan Ruppin

  • Maximum likelihood of phylogenetic networks

    Guohua Jin;Luay Nakhleh;Sagi Snir;Tamir Tuller

  • Determinants of translation elongation speed and ribosomal profiling biases in mouse embryonic stem cells.

    Alexandra Dana;Tamir Tuller

  • A model for competition for ribosomes in the cell.

    Alon Raveh;Michael Margaliot;Eduardo D. Sontag;Tamir Tuller

  • Association between translation efficiency and horizontal gene transfer within microbial communities

    Tamir Tuller;Yana Girshovich;Yael Sella;Avi Kreimer

  • Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees: hardness and approximation

    Benny Chor;Tamir Tuller

  • Modelling the Efficiency of Codon–tRNA Interactions Based on Codon Usage Bias

    Renana Sabi;Tamir Tuller

  • Predictive biophysical modeling and understanding of the dynamics of mRNA translation and its evolution

    Hadas Zur;Tamir Tuller

  • New universal rules of eukaryotic translation initiation fidelity.

    Hadas Zur;Tamir Tuller

  • Strong association between mRNA folding strength and protein abundance in S. cerevisiae

    Hadas Zur;Tamir Tuller

  • Common and specific signatures of gene expression and protein–protein interactions in autoimmune diseases

    T Tuller;S Atar;E Ruppin;M Gurevich

  • Entrainment to periodic initiation and transition rates in a computational model for gene translation.

    Michael Margaliot;Eduardo D. Sontag;Tamir Tuller

  • Inferring Phylogenetic Networks by the Maximum Parsimony Criterion: A Case Study

    Guohua Jin;Luay Nakhleh;Sagi Snir;Tamir Tuller

  • Translation efficiency in humans: tissue specificity, global optimization and differences between developmental stages

    Yedael Y. Waldman;Tamir Tuller;Tomer Shlomi;Roded Sharan

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Margaliot
Michael Margaliot Tel Aviv University
Martin Kupiec
Martin Kupiec Tel Aviv University
Eytan Ruppin
Eytan Ruppin National Institutes of Health
Benny Chor
Benny Chor Tel Aviv University
Eduardo D. Sontag
Eduardo D. Sontag Northeastern University
Luay Nakhleh
Luay Nakhleh Rice University
Uri Gophna
Uri Gophna Tel Aviv University
Daniel A. Chamovitz
Daniel A. Chamovitz Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Yitzhak Pilpel
Yitzhak Pilpel Weizmann Institute of Science
Ehud Shapiro
Ehud Shapiro Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse career options, many of which benefit from advanced education. For those interested in leadership roles in healthcare, online mha programs cahme accredited provide the flexibility to balance studies with professional responsibilities, while ensuring a high standard of quality.

If your passion lies in advanced nursing practice, you might consider a dnp program without clinical hours, designed for experienced nurses seeking doctoral-level expertise without the need for additional clinical practice.

Career growth in healthcare administration is also possible via an online phd in healthcare management. This pathway allows biochemistry and biology graduates to contribute to organizational innovation and policy making in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in pharmaceuticals, pursuing a degree at the best online pharmacy school can support a transition into clinical pharmacy, drug development, or pharmaceutical research.

These online degree options provide flexibility and specialization, making them accessible stepping stones toward rewarding science-based careers.

Best Scientists Citing Tamir Tuller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles