World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
16567
World Ranking
3495
National Ranking
1970

James M. Kauffman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Kauffman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 285 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James M. Kauffman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Kauffman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Kauffman is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of social sciences and psychology. Their scholarly contributions focus largely on education and clinical psychology, with significant intersections in safety research, developmental and educational psychology, and information systems.

The researcher has explored multiple topics within these fields, including:

  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Kauffman's recent publications illustrate a consistent focus on special education and disability policy. Notable papers include:

  • "Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality" (2020), published in Education Sciences
  • "Special Education Policy Prospects: Lessons From Social Policies Past" (2020), published in Exceptionality
  • "Hard LRE Choices in the Era of Inclusion: Rights and Their Implications" (2022), published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies

In addition to these works, the researcher has connections to scholarly discourse within Exceptionality through coauthored works with other authors in the field. Other recent influential publications in related areas include "Exceptional Learners" (2020) and "The Telos of Special Education: A Tripartite Approach" (2024).

Kauffman has collaborated regularly with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Garry Hornby
  • Dimitris Anastasiou
  • Marion Felder
  • João Lopes
  • Mack D. Burke

The venues in which Kauffman has most frequently published comprise:

  • Exceptionality
  • Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
  • Education Sciences
  • Support for Learning
  • Journal of Disability Policy Studies

The research output across these journals highlights a consistent engagement with issues related to special education, disability policy, and inclusive teaching practices. The blend of psychological and social science perspectives in Kauffman's work reflects a multidisciplinary approach toward understanding educational inequality, supports for families, and collaborative inclusion strategies within educational settings.

Best Publications

  • Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman;Paige C. Pullen

  • Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth

    James M. Kauffman

  • Exceptional Learners Introduction to Special Education

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman

  • Introduction to Learning Disabilities

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman;Lloyd, John, Ph. D.

  • What Is Special About Special Education for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders

    Timothy J. Landrum;Melody Tankersley;James M. Kauffman

  • A Social Constructionist Approach to Disability: Implications for Special Education

    Dimitris Anastasiou;James M. Kauffman

  • Special Education: What It Is and Why We Need It

    James M. Kauffman;Daniel P. Hallahan;Paige C. Pullen;Jeanmarie Badar

  • Special Education Implications of Point and Cumulative Prevalence for Children with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders.

    Steven R. Forness;Stephanny F. N. Freeman;Tanya Paparella;James M. Kauffman

  • Exceptional Children: Introduction to Special Education

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman

  • The illusion of full inclusion : a comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon

    James M. Kauffman;Daniel P. Hallahan

  • How We Might Achieve the Radical Reform of Special Education

    James M. Kauffman

  • How We Prevent the Prevention of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

    James M. Kauffman

  • Inclusion of All Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders? Let's Think Again.

    James M. Kauffman

  • Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: A developmental lag

    Sara G Tarver;Daniel P Hallahan;James M Kauffman;Donald W Ball

  • Bridging the Special Education Divide

    Jack E. Andrews;Douglas W. Carnine;Martha J. Coutinho;Eugene B. Edgar

  • RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION: SEPARATING THE RHETORIC OF SELF-CONGRATULATION FROM THE REALITY OF SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY IDENTIFICATION

    Kenneth A. Kavale;James M. Kauffman;Randy J. Bachmeier;Gretchen B. LeFever

  • Arguable Assumptions Underlying the Regular Education Initiative

    James M. Kauffman;Michael M. Gerber;Melvyn I. Semmel

  • Why do teachers refer pupils for special education? An analysis of referral records

    John Wills Lloyd;James M. Kauffman;Timothy J. Landrum;Donald L. Roe

  • Labels, Categories, Behaviors: Ed, Ld, and Emr Reconsidered

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman

  • Bringing Research to Bear on Practice: Effecting Evidence-Based Instruction for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders

    Brian G. Cook;Timothy J. Landrum;Melody Tankersley;James M. Kauffman

  • The Regular Education Initiative: Patent Medicine for Behavioral Disorders

    Sheldon Braaten;James M. Kauffman;Barbara Braaten;Lewis Polsgrove

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel P. Hallahan
Daniel P. Hallahan University of Virginia
John Wills Lloyd
John Wills Lloyd University of Virginia
C. Michael Nelson
C. Michael Nelson University of Kentucky
Steven R. Forness
Steven R. Forness University of California, Los Angeles
Michael H. Epstein
Michael H. Epstein University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Hill M. Walker
Hill M. Walker University of Oregon
Kenneth A. Kavale
Kenneth A. Kavale Regent University
Michael H. Epstein
Michael H. Epstein University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Michael M. Gerber
Michael M. Gerber University of California, Santa Barbara
Richard L. Simpson
Richard L. Simpson University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens diverse career pathways in mental health, counseling, and therapy across the USA. If you’re interested in becoming a licensed therapist, educational requirements and licensing processes can vary by city and state. Completing a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology or counseling is a common starting point.

For instance, those seeking to fulfill licensed therapist requirements in Chandler need to complete specific graduate programs and accumulate supervised clinical hours. Similarly, meeting Charlotte licensed therapist education requirements involves passing state-approved exams and specialized training.

In Chesapeake, aspiring professionals should review Chesapeake licensed therapist education requirements to understand local variations in licensure. Meanwhile, those interested in urban therapy settings can find detailed information on Chicago licensed therapist requirements.

Online psychology programs can provide the flexibility needed to meet these varying requirements, preparing you to pursue a meaningful career while meeting local regulations.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Kauffman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles