World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3495 3221 1970 1774 285 16567

James M. Kauffman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James M. Kauffman between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James M. Kauffman published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 7 of the 318 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2018. 1970: 4 publications 1971: 3 publications 1972: 7 publications 1973: 9 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 8 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1970 2025

318 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James M. Kauffman: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 4
1971 3
1972 7
1973 9
1974 4
1975 8
1976 8
1977 8
1978 4
1979 3
1980 2
1981 5
1982 7
1983 4
1984 3
1985 5
1986 4
1987 5
1988 4
1989 5
1990 3
1991 8
1992 6
1993 5
1994 4
1995 6
1996 9
1997 4
1998 7
1999 8
2000 7
2001 1
2002 4
2003 7
2004 6
2005 4
2006 2
2007 6
2008 5
2009 10
2010 1
2011 4
2012 4
2013 6
2014 7
2015 6
2016 6
2017 2
2018 16
2019 10
2020 8
2021 6
2022 16
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
Total 318
Download as CSV

James M. Kauffman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Kauffman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 285 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 285
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James M. Kauffman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Kauffman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James M. Kauffman is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of social sciences and psychology. Their scholarly contributions focus largely on education and clinical psychology, with significant intersections in safety research, developmental and educational psychology, and information systems.

The researcher has explored multiple topics within these fields, including:

  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Kauffman's recent publications illustrate a consistent focus on special education and disability policy. Notable papers include:

  • "Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality" (2020), published in Education Sciences
  • "Special Education Policy Prospects: Lessons From Social Policies Past" (2020), published in Exceptionality
  • "Hard LRE Choices in the Era of Inclusion: Rights and Their Implications" (2022), published in Journal of Disability Policy Studies

In addition to these works, the researcher has connections to scholarly discourse within Exceptionality through coauthored works with other authors in the field. Other recent influential publications in related areas include "Exceptional Learners" (2020) and "The Telos of Special Education: A Tripartite Approach" (2024).

Kauffman has collaborated regularly with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Garry Hornby
  • Dimitris Anastasiou
  • Marion Felder
  • João Lopes
  • Mack D. Burke

The venues in which Kauffman has most frequently published comprise:

  • Exceptionality
  • Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
  • Education Sciences
  • Support for Learning
  • Journal of Disability Policy Studies

The research output across these journals highlights a consistent engagement with issues related to special education, disability policy, and inclusive teaching practices. The blend of psychological and social science perspectives in Kauffman's work reflects a multidisciplinary approach toward understanding educational inequality, supports for families, and collaborative inclusion strategies within educational settings.

Best Publications

  • Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman;Paige C. Pullen

  • Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth

    James M. Kauffman

  • Exceptional Learners Introduction to Special Education

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman

  • Introduction to Learning Disabilities

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman;Lloyd, John, Ph. D.

  • What Is Special About Special Education for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders

    Timothy J. Landrum;Melody Tankersley;James M. Kauffman

  • A Social Constructionist Approach to Disability: Implications for Special Education

    Dimitris Anastasiou;James M. Kauffman

  • Special Education: What It Is and Why We Need It

    James M. Kauffman;Daniel P. Hallahan;Paige C. Pullen;Jeanmarie Badar

  • Special Education Implications of Point and Cumulative Prevalence for Children with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders.

    Steven R. Forness;Stephanny F. N. Freeman;Tanya Paparella;James M. Kauffman

  • Exceptional Children: Introduction to Special Education

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman

  • The illusion of full inclusion : a comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon

    James M. Kauffman;Daniel P. Hallahan

  • How We Might Achieve the Radical Reform of Special Education

    James M. Kauffman

  • How We Prevent the Prevention of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

    James M. Kauffman

  • Inclusion of All Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders? Let's Think Again.

    James M. Kauffman

  • Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: A developmental lag

    Sara G Tarver;Daniel P Hallahan;James M Kauffman;Donald W Ball

  • Bridging the Special Education Divide

    Jack E. Andrews;Douglas W. Carnine;Martha J. Coutinho;Eugene B. Edgar

  • RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION: SEPARATING THE RHETORIC OF SELF-CONGRATULATION FROM THE REALITY OF SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY IDENTIFICATION

    Kenneth A. Kavale;James M. Kauffman;Randy J. Bachmeier;Gretchen B. LeFever

  • Arguable Assumptions Underlying the Regular Education Initiative

    James M. Kauffman;Michael M. Gerber;Melvyn I. Semmel

  • Why do teachers refer pupils for special education? An analysis of referral records

    John Wills Lloyd;James M. Kauffman;Timothy J. Landrum;Donald L. Roe

  • Labels, Categories, Behaviors: Ed, Ld, and Emr Reconsidered

    Daniel P. Hallahan;James M. Kauffman

  • Bringing Research to Bear on Practice: Effecting Evidence-Based Instruction for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders

    Brian G. Cook;Timothy J. Landrum;Melody Tankersley;James M. Kauffman

  • The Regular Education Initiative: Patent Medicine for Behavioral Disorders

    Sheldon Braaten;James M. Kauffman;Barbara Braaten;Lewis Polsgrove

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel P. Hallahan
Daniel P. Hallahan University of Virginia
John Wills Lloyd
John Wills Lloyd University of Virginia
C. Michael Nelson
C. Michael Nelson University of Kentucky
Steven R. Forness
Steven R. Forness University of California, Los Angeles
Michael H. Epstein
Michael H. Epstein University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Hill M. Walker
Hill M. Walker University of Oregon
Kenneth A. Kavale
Kenneth A. Kavale Regent University
Michael H. Epstein
Michael H. Epstein University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Michael M. Gerber
Michael M. Gerber University of California, Santa Barbara
Richard L. Simpson
Richard L. Simpson University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens diverse career pathways in mental health, counseling, and therapy across the USA. If you’re interested in becoming a licensed therapist, educational requirements and licensing processes can vary by city and state. Completing a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology or counseling is a common starting point.

For instance, those seeking to fulfill licensed therapist requirements in Chandler need to complete specific graduate programs and accumulate supervised clinical hours. Similarly, meeting Charlotte licensed therapist education requirements involves passing state-approved exams and specialized training.

In Chesapeake, aspiring professionals should review Chesapeake licensed therapist education requirements to understand local variations in licensure. Meanwhile, those interested in urban therapy settings can find detailed information on Chicago licensed therapist requirements.

Online psychology programs can provide the flexibility needed to meet these varying requirements, preparing you to pursue a meaningful career while meeting local regulations.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Kauffman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles